Displaying 20 results from an estimated 207 matches for "backtrack".
Did you mean:
backtrace
2011 Oct 13
6
wine application uses all of my memory
Hi...I'm using BackTrack linux for a class I'm taking and using a program in wine that is just using all of my memory. Any ideas on how I can limit this program from using all of my memory. I'm on a mac running vmware fusion 4.0 and have backtrack 5r1 as a vm
2010 Jun 04
1
Problem Installing Latest WINE in Backtrack 4
Hi all!
A quick question: I just moved from Windows over to Linux, using Backtrack 4, which is based off of Ubuntu if I am not mistaken. One of the programs that I really need to get running, www.magicworkstation.com , really needs one of the later (unstable) releases of WINE to work. Well, so I go to follow the instructions to get the updated version, using the Ubuntu instructio...
2007 Oct 04
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...ll-opt:
....
Given clause: 29875[3:Res:23.2,29765.0] || member(U,singleton
(universal_class))* -> .
SPASS V 2.1
SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
Problem: /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/tc-test/llvm/projects/llvm-
test/MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/problem.dfg
SPASS derived 39592 clauses, backtracked 10752 clauses and kept 23124
clauses.
SPASS allocated 3905 KBytes.
SPASS spent No Timing on this machine. on the problem.
No Timing on this machine. for the input.
No Timing on this machine. for the FLOTTER CNF
translation.
No Timi...
2010 Sep 09
3
1.9.2 why does relative_require need an additional backtrack in path
Why does Ruby-1.9.2-p0 require an additional ../ for relative paths
when compared to the same code for ruby1.8?
if RUBY_VERSION < ''1.9''
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + library
else
require_relative File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/..'' + library
end
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core"
2009 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] Regular Expression lib support
Hello LLVM Devs,
I thought I'd weigh in on some of these non-backtracking linear time RegEx algorithms. If they're anything like the PackRat parsing algorithms they take at least 4x the amount of memory in terms of storage as the string length itself by not backtracking. That should be fine for small RegExes but it wouldn't do so well for more elaborate and...
2007 Oct 03
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
On Oct 2, 2007, at 2:27 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I changed the code that checks whether a tail call is really
> eligible for optimization so that it performs the check/fix in
> SelectionDAGISel.cpp:BuildSelectionDAG() as suggest by Evan. Also
> eliminated an error that caused the remaining failing test cases in
> the test-suite.
>
> The
2012 Jun 27
0
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural slicing using LLVM
...wo static backwards slicing passes for LLVM.
The first is a partial implementation I wrote for a course project. The
code is in the giri project:
svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/giri/trunk giri
The Giri code runs with an older version of LLVM and probably needs some
TLC. It also only backtracks until it hits a load; additional code must
be written to backtrack further to find potentially reaching stores.
The second option is to use some code written by Jiri Slaby at
https://github.com/jirislaby/LLVMSlicer. I believe his implementation
is a complete static backwards slicer, but I hav...
2003 Aug 08
2
Re2: Problem -ATA-711-723-Oh323-Asterisk(BACKTRACK INFO]
Hello Michael,
Here is the BackTrace of the program which i forgot
to attach
BACKTRACE OF Asterisk -vvc
#0 0x42074d60 in _int_realloc () from
/lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x420738c4 in realloc () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0x47c7da89 in PAbstractArray::SetSize(int) () from
/home/sip/pwlib/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.5
#3 0x47c7cf4d in PContainer::SetMinSize(int) () from
2012 Jun 26
2
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural slicing using LLVM
Hello,
I am curious to know if LLVM offers any passes to do interprocedural slicing, I need to eliminate most of the computations(possibly all, if they don't influence the control flow), but the control flow of the program should be maintained at all cost. I did see an optimization pass to print the CFG of a function without its body to a dot file, but I am interested in generating the
2007 Nov 28
6
Broken edge
...an error in rspec_on_rails:
ArgumentError in ''UserController without logged in user should show
the index page''
wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)
..../vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/rails/example/behaviour/
controller_example_group.rb:188:in `render''
I tried backtracking to an earlier version of rails with no luck.
Can anyone provide some version numbers (for rspec, rspec on rails,
and rails itself) that I can downgrade back to so my specs work again?
Thanks a lot!
Daniel
2007 Oct 04
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...clause: 29875[3:Res:23.2,29765.0] || member(U,singleton
> (universal_class))* -> .
> SPASS V 2.1
> SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
> Problem: /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/tc-test/llvm/projects/llvm-
> test/MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/problem.dfg
> SPASS derived 39592 clauses, backtracked 10752 clauses and kept 23124
> clauses.
> SPASS allocated 3905 KBytes.
> SPASS spent No Timing on this machine. on the problem.
> No Timing on this machine. for the input.
> No Timing on this machine. for the FLOTTER CNF
> translation.
&...
2006 Dec 23
1
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in the linear scan register allocator
..., causing the RA to
>run out of registers. We want to coallesce physregs when possible,
>but we cannot pin them in the spiller:
>we have to be able to >uncoallesce them.
First of all, I totally agree with "we have to be able to uncoallesce
them". Linear Scan already does a backtracking in some situations. I'm
wondering, if it is very difficult to implement the logic, where when
it detects that it runs for ever (i.e. nothing can be spilled for some
reason) it basically backtracks completely, does coallescing again but
ignoring some selected virtual/physical registers (or...
2008 Jun 02
2
get method under 1.1.4 in Stories is undefined
HI,
After I upgraded to RSpec 1.1.4 (from git), my stories all failed. I
was using Webrat and the first thing I noticed was the ''visits'' method
was gone. I then backtracked to just using ''get'' and got the same
undefined method exception. I confirmed it was still working in 1.1.3
Eventually, I got it to work doing this:
in my first Given:
@app = ActionController::Integration::Session.new
in some When
@app.get page
or using Webrat:...
2008 Feb 10
0
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
...ppen is that, in order to reload spilled variables,
> you will need registers available.
As far as I understand, it is guaranteed by the algorithm, no special
reservation in advance is neccessary.
> So, either you spare two registers,
> what would be very restrictive in x86, or you do backtracking, as the
> current implementation of LLVM's linear scan does. Backtracking may
> slowdown the implementation quite a bit.
Agree. But it is not neccessary. The way how move instructions are
inserted is very similar to Wimmer's linear scan algorithm. There is no
need for any res...
2006 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries
...trol over what code some potential user might want to model
check.
I was wondering whether there might be anything in the JIT support that
could be reused for this purpose?
I can't really move to using the JIT entirely because I want to replace
the memory model with something that supports backtracking -- this is
doable (fairly) straightforwardly with the interpreter, but it would
require some very complicated transformations to the code in order to do
this within the JIT environment, and it would be quite tricky to avoid
subtly breaking the semantics. That kind of approach is possible,
p...
2007 Mar 13
3
re: decoder issue in sb_celp
A little more info on this:
I backtracked deeper into this and it looks like excBuf
is corrupted, which is corrupted by low_innov_alias
being invalid. However it is not entirely clear where
that gets initialized (in sb_celp it is set to out+st->frame_size)
Tom
2010 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] r98938 broke argument passing on MSP430?
Hello,
Yesterday I noticed that MSP430 argument passing is broken in trunk;
see http://llvm.org/PR6573 for details and testcases. The problem is
that calls aren't being preceded by instructions that put the
arguments into registers. I backtracked my working copy and then
stepped forward until it broke between r98937 and r98938. Refining
further, I found that rolling back the single-statement change to
utils/TableGen/DAGISelMatcherGen.cpp -- something about variadic
instructions that was probably OK for x86, but MSP430 doesn't have
va...
2010 Apr 11
2
[LLVMdev] call for suggestions
Hi, Dear LLVMers
I just touch llvm source code for several days, and I didn't know the
interfaces of the analysises and transformations of LLVM. For exampe, how
to backtrace CFG, and whether exits a backtracking interator to do such
work?
For a novice, I also seek for suggestions about how to become familiar with
LLVM interfaces as soon as possible. Now I have a plan to write a pass based
on LLVM, and my first challenge is how to make the best use of LLVM's
analysis and transformations. Is it the b...
2006 Apr 17
2
Encrypting Ogg
...e to use all the
normal seeking operations, etc, on the "encrypted" file as the cleartext
stream.
But my brain gets a bit stuck on implementation... I'm not quite sure
how to "interpose" my library/application that way.
I'm using Python for development (I can always backtrack to C++/etc);
my application should take an encrypted OGG stream and a key, and you
should be able to seek through the file as if it wasn't encrypted.
Any pointers? Similar projects? Any help would be appreciated.
--
+----+ Shawn Boles +------+/
/( )/| "Chief En...
2009 Aug 24
8
[LLVMdev] Regular Expression lib support
...ime in size of string.
Nice, we need something for windows.
> The Google impl was, at least if i remember right, made up of 3
> engines: 1 that was a special case matcher that handled plain old
> anchored strings super fast, 1 that dealt with regular expressions
> that did not require backtracking, and 1 that dealt with regular
> expressions that did.
FWIW, I plan to have different syntax in filecheck for fixed string
matching vs regex matching. This should eliminate most of the common
reasons for needing "leaning toothpicks".
> If you are curious, see http://swtch....