Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "b762".
Did you mean:
762
2020 Apr 23
2
Testing COI
...running Dovecot 2.3.10 and coi at the same version.
Am I missing something here?
Thanks in advance
Christian
--
R??ner-Network-Solutions
Karl-Br?ger-Str. 10, 36304 Alsfeld
Fax: +49 6631 78823409, Mobil: +49 171 9905345
USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, https://roessner.website
PGP fingerprint: 658D 1342 B762 F484 2DDF 1E88 38A5 4346 D727 94E5
2006 Feb 23
4
Keep getting message in logs that pbx.c cannot find extension context 'default'
...] chan_sip.c: SIP message could not be
handled, bad request: 70975D7A-CF70-4C05-8F21-56B06195995F@10.0.0.40
Feb 23 07:56:12 NOTICE[2470] pbx.c: Cannot find extension context 'default'
Feb 23 07:56:12 DEBUG[2470] chan_sip.c: SIP message could not be
handled, bad request: 8FF38834-6E36-4AC7-B762-27AFA6EA84E9@10.0.0.43
Feb 23 07:56:14 NOTICE[2470] pbx.c: Cannot find extension context 'default'
Feb 23 07:56:14 DEBUG[2470] chan_sip.c: SIP message could not be
handled, bad request: 953B85B6-43CA-47A3-9425-93E1D94C46B8@10.0.0.47
*********************
I do not have a default context us...
2010 Feb 01
3
merging data frames gives all NAs
...NA <NA> <NA> <NA>
552 1/1/09 23:03 2009-01-01 1 23 3 92 5 AA AAL
AAL22
AircraftType Tail Arrived STA Runway FromTo Delay
Operator
NA <NA> <NA> <NA> <NA> <NA> <NA> NA <NA>
552 B762 N329AA 23:03:35 23:10 31L LAX /JFK 0 AMERICAN
AIRLINES
dq gw
NA <NA> NA
But after the merge, I get all NAs. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Jim Rome
552 2009-01-01 92 1
2020 Apr 23
0
Re-to-archived-thread: Dict issue with PostgreSQL for last_login plugin (duplicate key)
....
Feel free to comment :-)
Christian
Thread online: https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2019-May/115921.html
--
R??ner-Network-Solutions
Karl-Br?ger-Str. 10, 36304 Alsfeld
Fax: +49 6631 78823409, Mobil: +49 171 9905345
USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, https://roessner.website
PGP fingerprint: 658D 1342 B762 F484 2DDF 1E88 38A5 4346 D727 94E5
2020 Apr 23
0
Testing COI
...631 78823409, Mobil: +49 171 9905345
</div>
<div>
USt-IdNr.: DE225643613,
<a href="https://roessner.website" rel="noopener" target="_blank">https://roessner.website</a>
</div>
<div>
PGP fingerprint: 658D 1342 B762 F484 2DDF 1E88 38A5 4346 D727 94E5
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
imap_coi_plugin can only be loaded for imap.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
protocol imap {
</div>
<div>...
2020 May 11
2
Directory hashing
...d high nibbles. How can I express this for sha256?
in MD5 this would be %1Mu
Many thanks in advance
Christian
--
R??ner-Network-Solutions
Karl-Br?ger-Str. 10, 36304 Alsfeld
Fax: +49 6631 78823409, Mobil: +49 171 9905345
USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, https://roessner.website
PGP fingerprint: 658D 1342 B762 F484 2DDF 1E88 38A5 4346 D727 94E5
2020 May 11
0
Directory hashing
...y much the same way, %1{sha256:..} and %4{sha256:...}.
Thanks. I will try that out.
Christian
>
> Aki
--
R??ner-Network-Solutions
Karl-Br?ger-Str. 10, 36304 Alsfeld
Fax: +49 6631 78823409, Mobil: +49 171 9905345
USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, https://roessner.website
PGP fingerprint: 658D 1342 B762 F484 2DDF 1E88 38A5 4346 D727 94E5
2020 May 11
2
Directory hashing
> On 11/05/2020 11:10 Simone Lazzaris <s.lazzaris at interactive.eu> wrote:
>
>
> In data luned? 11 maggio 2020 10:00:38 CEST, lists at mlserv.org ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I struggle with directory hashing. I want something like this:
> >
> > /srv/mail/c/cf37a8dff5e360927ba10ab2
> >
> > The final folder is simpel, as it is:
>
2018 Apr 18
0
Bitrot - Restoring bad file
On 04/17/2018 06:25 PM, Omar Kohl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding bitrot detection.
>
> Following the RedHat manual (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.3/html/administration_guide/bitrot-restore_corrupt_file) I am trying out bad-file-restoration after bitrot.
>
> "gluster volume bitrot VOLNAME status" gets me the
2010 Oct 22
2
cannot create volume
hi
all guys!
I'm using glusterfs 3.10 now .I got 10 node to run gluster.I found a problem here:
[root at gluster-bak-1 /root]
#gluster volume create db-backup stripe 4 transport tcp gluster-bak-3:/data3 gluster-bak-4:/data4 gluster-bak-5:/data5 gluster-bak-6:/data6
Creation of volume db-backup has been unsuccessful
the volume cannot be created!
and I found the log in
2018 Apr 17
2
Bitrot - Restoring bad file
Hi,
I have a question regarding bitrot detection.
Following the RedHat manual (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.3/html/administration_guide/bitrot-restore_corrupt_file) I am trying out bad-file-restoration after bitrot.
"gluster volume bitrot VOLNAME status" gets me the GFIDs that are corrupt and on which Host this happens.
As far as I can tell