search for: await

...ephone-engineer.com/downloads/versatility/versatility-installation.pdf Putting the pri span in debug mode I can see the following log continuously scrolling and the PBX never synchronize with the openvox B400P card: PRI Span: 1 TEI=0 MDL-ERROR (G): T200 expired N200 times sending SABME in state 5(Awaiting establishment) PRI Span: 1 Changing from state 5(Awaiting establishment) to 4(TEI assigned) PRI Span: 1 TEI=0 DL event: Q931_DL_EVENT_DL_RELEASE_IND(3) PRI Span: 1 SAPI/TEI=0/0 Kick starting link PRI Span: 1 TEI=0 Sending SABME PRI Span: 1 Changing from state 4(TEI assigned) to 5(Awaiting establ...

Hi, I am currently running a 10 Node OCFS2 Cluster (version 1.3.9-0ubuntu1) on Ubuntu Server 8.04 x86_64. Linux n1 2.6.24-24-server #1 SMP Tue Jul 7 19:39:36 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux The Cluster is connected to a 1Tera iSCSI Device presented by an IBM 3300 Storage System, running over a 1Gig Network. Mounted on all nodes: /dev/sdc1 on /cfs1 type ocfs2

...0 T203: 10000 T303: 4000 T305: 30000 T308: 4000 T309: 6000 T313: 4000 T-HOLD: 4000 T-RETRIEVE: 4000 T-RESPONSE: 4000 Overlap Recv: No 3. localhost*CLI> *pri set debug on span 1* Enabled debugging on span 1 TEI=0 MDL-ERROR (G): T200 expired N200 times sending SABME in state 5(Awaiting establishment) Changing from state 5(Awaiting establishment) to 4(TEI assigned) TEI=0 DL event: Q931_DL_EVENT_DL_RELEASE_IND(3) TEI=0 Sending SABME Changing from state 4(TEI assigned) to 5(Awaiting establishment) TEI=0 Sending SABME TEI=0 Sending SABME TEI=0 Sending SABME TEI=0 MDL-ERROR (G): T2...

dimesio wrote: > > durammx wrote: > > Hi all! > > I trying to run this program (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=17469) but I'm a really noob on wine. :? > > Can a big master of wine test? > > > > Also posted a bug (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19678) on bugzilla. > > > > Hope I did it well. >

...k_pend=0 > T200_id=8192, N200=3, T203_id=0 > [ 00 01 7f ] > Unnumbered frame: > SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 > TEI: 000 EA: 1 > M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] > 0 bytes of data Changing from state 4(TEI assigned) to 5(Awaiting establishment) t200_expire TEI: 0 State 5(Awaiting establishment) V(A)=0, V(S)=0, V(R)=0 K=7, RC=0, l3_initiated=1, reject_except=0, ack_pend=0 T200_id=8192, N200=3, T203_id=0 TEI=0 Sending SABME > TEI: 0 State 5(Awaiting establishment) > V(A)=0, V(S)=0, V(R)=0 > K=7, RC...

What filter rule is violated? So frustrated, why can't I post question! ----- Original Message ---- From: "r-help-bounces at r-project.org" <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> To: yjmha69 at yahoo.com Sent: Fri, June 4, 2010 12:28:37 PM Subject: Your message to R-help awaits moderator approval Your mail to 'R-help' with the subject ? ? subsetting a dataframe Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: ? ? The message headers matched a filter rule Either the message will get posted to the list, or you wi...

...o and [Mar 18 17:04:05] VERBOSE[19844] chan_dahdi.c: TEI=0 MDL-ERROR (I): T200 expired N200 times sending RR/RNR in state 8(Timer recovery) [Mar 18 17:04:05] VERBOSE[19844] chan_dahdi.c: TEI=0 Sending SABME [Mar 18 17:04:05] VERBOSE[19844] chan_dahdi.c: Changing from state 8(Timer recovery) to 5(Awaiting establishment) [Mar 18 17:04:06] VERBOSE[19844] chan_dahdi.c: TEI=0 Sending SABME [Mar 18 17:04:07] VERBOSE[19844] chan_dahdi.c: TEI=0 Sending SABME [Mar 18 17:04:08] VERBOSE[19844] chan_dahdi.c: TEI=0 Sending SABME [Mar 18 17:04:09] VERBOSE[19844] chan_dahdi.c: TEI=0 MDL-ERROR (G): *T200 expire...

...ite (as I cannot find any instructions how to get to it). Thank you, Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of icecast-owner at xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2023 6:02 PM To: redwood.andrew at gmail.com Subject: Your message to Icecast awaits moderator approval Your mail to 'Icecast' with the subject How to fire up Icecast? Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message body is too big: 59787 bytes with a limit of 40 KB Either the message will get posted to...

...how to read Icecast threads. Any advice? Rgds, Andrew From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of D.T. Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 9:32 PM To: Icecast streaming server user discussions <icecast at xiph.org> Subject: Re: [Icecast] FW: Your message to Icecast awaits moderator approval You posted this message to the list, I'm not a mod and I can read it. For March, I do not see any other post made by you. It clearly says WHY your post was rejected: "Message body is too big: 59787 bytes with a limit of 40 KB" I suspect this was...

...neous and listeners start get errors (403, busy, please try again later), and after digging, delete logs and restart icecast we found this: [2020-11-15 22:09:38] INFO auth/queue_auth_client auth on (default mount) has 101 pending [2020-11-15 22:09:38] WARN auth/auth_add_listener too many clients awaiting authentication Before those errors our auth api was logging ~60 rps in ~150ms (during the error the api was not getting requests). Has anyone else has already faced this problem? Any tips? Best, Thiago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://...

...). > > Thank you, > Andrew > ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of > icecast-owner at xiph.org > Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2023 6:02 PM > To: redwood.andrew at gmail.com > Subject: Your message to Icecast awaits moderator approval > > Your mail to 'Icecast' with the subject > > ??? How to fire up Icecast? > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > ??? Message body is too big: 59787 bytes with a limi...

...vice? > ? > Rgds, > Andrew > ? > ? > From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of D.T. > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 9:32 PM > To: Icecast streaming server user discussions <icecast at xiph.org> > Subject: Re: [Icecast] FW: Your message to Icecast awaits moderator > approval > ? > You posted this message to the list, I'm not a mod and I can read it. > ? > For March, I do not see any other post made by you. > ? > It clearly says WHY your post was rejected: > ? > "Message body is too big: 59787 bytes with a limit...

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] Syslinux keyboard mappings > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you

...pics and follow the various contributions? Thanks, Andrew From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of D.T. Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2023 2:00 AM To: Icecast streaming server user discussions <icecast at xiph.org> Subject: Re: [Icecast] FW: Your message to Icecast awaits moderator approval On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 21:45 +1100, redwood.andrew at gmail.com <mailto:redwood.andrew at gmail.com> wrote: Yes, I did see that msg about taking up too many bytes ? but I never received the promised email from the mods, telling me it had been rejected! So I assume...

...19:13, Kelly Lesperance wrote: > Hdparm didn?t get far: > > [root at r1k1 ~] # hdparm -tT /dev/sda > > /dev/sda: > Timing cached reads: Alarm clock > [root at r1k1 ~] # Hi Kelly, Try running 'iostat -xdmc 1'. Look for a single drive that has substantially greater await than ~10msec. If all the drives except one are taking 6-8msec, but one is very much more, you've got a drive that drags down the whole array's performance. Ignore the very first output from the command - it's an average of the disk subsystem since boot. Post a representative output a...

...ollowing happens:* superman at travis-lin:~$ sh winetricks gecko --13:43:26-- http://source.winehq.org/winegecko.php?v=0.1.0 => `winegecko.php?v=0.1.0' Resolving source.winehq.org... 209.46.25.134 Connecting to source.winehq.org|209.46.25.134|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found Location: http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/wine_gecko-0.1.0.cab [following] --13:43:31-- http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/wine_gecko-0.1.0.cab => `wine_gecko-0.1.0.cab' Resolving optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net... 211....

...at r2k1 ~] # iostat -xdmc 1 10 Linux 3.10.0-327.13.1.el7.x86_64 (r2k1) 05/27/16 _x86_64_ (32 CPU) avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 8.87 0.02 1.28 0.21 0.00 89.62 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rMB/s wMB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util sdd 0.02 0.55 0.15 27.06 0.03 11.40 859.89 1.02 37.40 36.13 37.41 6.86 18.65 sdf 0.02 0.48 0.15 26.99 0.03 11.40 862.17 0.15 5.56 40.94 5.37 7.27 19.73 sdk 0.03...

...e programs successfully. But when using java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock and java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition, I catch a Throwable : java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: sun.misc.Unsafe.unpark(Ljava/lang/Object;)V after using the function : void java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition.await() My test program is as follows: *import* *java.lang*.*; *import* *java.util.Map*; *import* *java.io*.*; *import* java.util.concurrent.locks.*; *class* BoundedBuffer { Lock lock; Condition notFull; Condition notEmpty; *final* Object[] items = *new*...

On 3/27/23 03:25, rack00terry at icloud.com wrote: > Horses for courses perhaps. But I get way too much email, and > personally find book marking a current web conversation much easier. Not to sound rude, but sounds like a 'you' problem and not an 'Icecast mailing list' problem. > Moreover, I don?t want my email address shared with a massive (presumably) list, so I

Your mail to 'Nut-commits' with the subject CVS %1{sVv} Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following