search for: autosenses

Hi All, I have a thin cliente here that i want to run asterisk: - National Semicondudor Geode GX1 266MHz Geode 266MHz single chip - NS Cx5530a Southbridge National Semiconductors SC2200 - NS PC97317 in chipset - 32MB Compact Flash - 64MB Ram - 10/100Mbps, Autosense 10/100Mbps, Autosense Realtek 8139C National DP83815 / DP83816 Some tip? I have a ide>flash

Begging indulgence of the list - asking here because due to the higher likelyhood of getting an answer... I have an application that often loses connection from one machine to another when one (or more) of the machines has particular brands of 1gig nics, but which runs rock solid when on 10meg nics and some 1 gig nics. The application senses (falsely) that the connection has been shut

This is troubling. Shouldn't your hubs/routers autosense the 10MBPS? ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: WipeOut <wipe_out@lycos.co.uk> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:53:13 +0100 >Steven J. Sobol wrote: > >>On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jon Pounder wrote: >> >> >>Nothing works. Call transfer

Hi there, I'm having an odd problem where this NIC (cheap-o, yes I know) doesn't seem to work on FreeBSD correctly. I have the same cards (even revision models) in two win boxen and they work fine. 10baseT works but not 100baseT. With a normal NIC config, without explicitly setting the media to 10baseT, it will autosense as 100BaseT @ full-duplex, showing active. However I can't

...viously I don’t want it to > generate code unsupported by the CPU either (i.e. I only want to > force the SSE level lower, not higher). Is this already supported, > or would anyone else be interested in that and/or be able to suggest > how best to add this feature? > The JIT autosenses the current CPU and forces the features it detects, you can hack this by (e.g.) changing X86Subtarget::AutoDetectSubtargetFeatures. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091028/546e6d33...

Oops, samba@lists.samba.org, not SALBA (: /dev/idal --- Chris de Vidal <cdevidal@yahoo.com> wrote: > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:19:56 -0800 (PST) > From: Chris de Vidal <cdevidal@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: oplock problems > To: Brian Johnson <bjohnson@jecinc.on.ca> > CC: salba@lists.samba.org > > --- Brian Johnson <bjohnson@jecinc.on.ca> wrote: >

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:45:51AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > I'm wondering if we're missing documentation here (and/or in the plugins > document) that if .can_write returns true, the plugin must supply a > .pwrite; likewise for .can_trim implying a .trim, and .can_flush > implying a .flush. It's a strange one. For example if a plugin returns .can_pwrite == 1 but

Hi all, Is there a convenient way to control the instruction set extensions used for JIT compilation? In particular I'm looking at selecting the SSE level, for debugging and performance comparison purposes. There appear to be command-line options for Clang but I haven't figured out yet how to control them directly for JIT compilation. And obviously I don't want it to generate

Hi, Last week I discovered that my samba-server seems rather slow. When I searched around I discovered that I wasn't the only one experiencing this, but I didn't find a solution. I experimented a little, and I hope someone can suggest a solution. First my server : SuSE 8.1, with Samba 2.2.5 (comes with the distribution). From a WinME-client I uploaded a 160Mb file to the samba-server.

This is a bit off topic, because I 'think' it isn't an Asterisk problem. However I'm not sure and anyhow I'm hoping someone may recognize the symptom. We moved offices a month ago. Our trusty SNOM190s (all between 3 and 5 years old) were packed up for the move, then unpacked a couple of weeks later. On unpacking them and connecting them to the new network, several of

At the risk of angering the crash Gods, my sustem has NOT crashed again since I downgraded the kernel from 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5 to 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5. Given that newfound stability, and my lack of time, I'm going to put on hold any further diagnostics, until the next kernel revision is released. I have submitted a report at bugzilla.redhat.com (bug 218128). (Ah, nuts; accidentally created a

I have two DELL servers with two Ethernet ports in it. Bith servers have CENTOS 4.5 installed. First Ethernet port connect to public Ethernet line and work correctly. Second Ethernet port I connect point-to-point as private Ethernet (cable direct connect without router or switch). Private Ethernet use IP asddress 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2. I check "ifconfig -a" and both eth0 and eth1 are

Hi, I've had extremely bad smbclient put performance when connecting from my Linux box to a Windows 95 box. I only get about 10KBytes/s! All other forms of data transfer work fine, and I get from 600-700KBytes/s. This is on a local 10BT LAN. I've seen a few other reports of this, but no solutions as of yet. smbclient does puts just fine to another Linux/Samba Server. I'm using

based on what your saying.. im not thinking this is samba related. I guess check your switches and find the "fault" autosense for your nics.. You can use thisone to disable autosence ethtool -s ethX autoneg off en set correct nic speed. ethtool -s ethX speed XXXX BUT ! check your switches first. greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: sambait3 at

Hi folks on debian stable I've a default samba file sharing config. Everything works perfectly (almost...) - samba version 3.6.6 >From linux and windows clients (wired and wifi too) when I (i.e. listen musics) often (one time every 4/5 minutes) networks suddenly collapse (for less one second) and immediately goes up. So I've an interrupt of broadcast (this happens also if I use rsync

Hi all Thanks to David Collier-Brown for the mail on Friday - we are looking into it right now. Our setup is: RedHat 6.1, Samba 2.0.5a, on a HP LH3 NetServer - 256 MB, 5x9GB RAID 5, also running Apache and the Intranet. Cisco Catalyst 2900 (24 port) switch, and a mix of HP and NetGear hubs. PCs are connected to the hubs and then upload to the switch, the servers are straight onto the switch.

Hi I have a quad processor Compaq Proliant 5500. The output from dmesg seems strange (I have also sent a copy to freebsd-smp to ask about smp issues) and there are also some performance issues which I suspect are smp related. Could anyone who fels so inclined please take a look at the output and let me have any comments. Thanks _______________________________ Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The

From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> Convert camel case struct fields in vstorage.h to lowercase Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------

From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> Convert camel case struct fields in vstorage.h to lowercase Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------

I put this to the smp list and to stable but have had no takers from wither. nThere are both smp and other system issues and I am just wondering if anyoe would be willing to take a look at this output from dmesg and let me have some advice Thanks david ----- Original Message ----- From: "vizion communication" <vizion@ixpres.com> To: <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org> Sent: