search for: autonegotiates

I have just noticed this message in my kernel logs, reporting the possibility of an error with my memory. This would go a long way towards explaining the problems i''ve been having. This particular error is occuring when i''m not running xen so is obviously not something brought on by xen itself. The strange thing is that the NMI error is always followed by the TLAN: eth0: Adaptor

Howdy: This is (at least slightly) off-topic, but I've seen more knowledgeable folks than I mention autonegotiation in this venue and, since I didn't get any response on the vortex-bugs mailing list, I thought I'd ask here (also, the interface in question supports samba so...). And there should be some good news for some folks too. If this is old news, sorry (I've been too busy

> -----Original Message----- > From: Travis Johnson [mailto:tlj@ida.net] > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:05 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7940/7960 ethernet ports > [...] > We are having a problem with Cisco 7940 and 7960 phones when > the PC is plugged into the 2nd ethernet port on the phone. It > will drop the

...eSpeed[1] TSOcap [1] Both machines are wired in the same way: eth0 is connected do 100mbit switch, eth1 to a gigabit switch. But: # mii-tool eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok eth1: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok If I force eth1 to 1000 with ethtool, I get no link and then it autonegotiates itself back to 100. I can't even get them to talk at gigabit speed if I connect both machines together with crossover cable! Am I doing something wrong or is this a hardware problem? -- Jure Pe?ar http://jure.pecar.org/

Hi, I've had extremely bad smbclient put performance when connecting from my Linux box to a Windows 95 box. I only get about 10KBytes/s! All other forms of data transfer work fine, and I get from 600-700KBytes/s. This is on a local 10BT LAN. I've seen a few other reports of this, but no solutions as of yet. smbclient does puts just fine to another Linux/Samba Server. I'm using

[Sorry if this is off-topic for this list, please advise me if there''s a better place to ask this] I have an embeded motherboard with 4 natsemi (DP8315) ethernet chips. I''m running a 2.6.9 kernel (I''ve tried 2.6.11 too) and a very minimal Slackware distribution. Now about the problem: The network interfaces seem to NOT transmit anything when the interface is

On 10/10/2016 5:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro > X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. > The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable > to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). > > These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather

We've just moved one a new server from our sever room, where I built it, to the datacenter. We want to force autoneg off, and tell it gigabit and full duplex. Using ethtool, I get no errors setting the speed or duplex. HOWEVER, autoneg on works... and autoneg off utterly refuses to work, and gives: ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off Cannot set new settings: Invalid argument not setting autoneg

I can not disable the auto-negotiation (eth1) on my centos 6.2 via ethtool or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 the eth1 is a private network on a cheap gigabit-switch (under controll from a serverhoster). sometime the ethernet-card lost the "speed" and "duplex" information and change it to "unknown". i can only fix this with a network-restart (or

Dear colleagues, experimenting with new amd64-based router we found strange re(4) behaviour when working in autoselect media mode: whenever promisc mode turned on, renegotiating occurs, leading to 3 to 45 (depending on STP settings on the switch) network unavailability. Moreover, some other re(4) setting changes seem to disturb link state unneededly (such as ifconfig re0 -vlanhwtag) The most

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060904/6ca2ff93/signature-0001.pgp

On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these: $ rpm -ql net-tools

Hai Roy, I had a good look and most look ok, not much exiting going on but still a few points. >From teh logs. Feb 5 08:41:48 pi4b ifup[303]: ifup: couldn't open interfaces file "/etc/network/interfaces": No such file or directory So re-create the file with the folling content, : /etc/network/interfaces And add : # This file describes the network interfaces available on

Hi, Last week I discovered that my samba-server seems rather slow. When I searched around I discovered that I wasn't the only one experiencing this, but I didn't find a solution. I experimented a little, and I hope someone can suggest a solution. First my server : SuSE 8.1, with Samba 2.2.5 (comes with the distribution). From a WinME-client I uploaded a 160Mb file to the samba-server.

hello everyone, i am setting up my computer and want to establish internet connection over ADSL. For this i have to use pptp. The annoying thing is, that doing 'pptp 10.0.0.138' i get a connection only every second time. Perhaps it is a problem, that i cannot stop pptp but killing it, and therefore pppd has to clean up? i am using pppd 2.4.3 and pptp 1.5.0 Thanks in advance

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 Summary: system hangs, Availability problems, maybe conntrack bug, possible reason here. Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

Hi List, I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided to not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3 were bonded (mode 1 ) after reboot the bond did not work. It came up OK but no data was passing through it. all other interfaces on the machine were working. I decided to remove the bond, so after removing the bond i was left with eth0

Am 02.07.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > Have you yet: > setsebool -P use_samba_home_dirs 1 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > No, I didn't set it. Now I've set it and when logging into text console I no longer have the problem with the home

I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather than gigE. I've swapped ports and cables with a different server,

I'm trying to maximize throughput between my Samba server and my Win2k (SP3 and 4) clients. Samba's configured to allow up to 64k packets and the server is on a GigE network (3com card, acenic driver) with SCSI UW2 drives (software RAID1 and RAID5 volumes). All clients are 100MB/sec FDX on a switched LAN. I can get sustained 35MB/sec transfers (read and write) on the disk subsystem