Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "autobuilt".
Did you mean:
autobuild
2004 Dec 14
4
Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
...Before public release, a QA procedure should make sure that there are no
obvious problems (like the comps issue of 3.3).
* Idea: automatic patch building.
It should be possible to build most patches without intervention. I
don't know what the current systems in place are but if there were
autobuilt unsigned patches available it would allow
- testing of patches before they are 'officially' released
- checking the progress if a patch
Using an automatic system to apply CentOS specific modifications means
that in some cases, the CentOS specific changes can also be autoapplied
and the p...
2006 Aug 30
3
pkg-xen team dead?
Hi folks
With the lack of responses to my restructuring the last weeks, it looks
like pkg-xen is dead.
Now, what to do? My favorite is to merge it into the kernel repository
where I have my infrastructure (archive and autobuilders for snapshots
for example) to properly work on it.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
-------------- next part
2002 Nov 01
2
installing R on debian linux
I have a shiny new debian linux box and am just about to install R. I'm
also a shiny new linux user,
so please excuse these naive questions.
I've read the 'R Installation and Admin guide (2002-10-01)' and also
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/ReadMe, and I know how to do
apt-get install r-base
which gives me
r-base-core r-base-html r-base-latex r-base-core
2012 Apr 26
2
LDA crashes on delivery (using sieve)
Hello,
The current version of LDA can crash (seg fault 11) under certain
circumstances.
I don't know why it happens only with some accounts, but here is a
backtrace. The user has a sieve filter in place :
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x0000000800443434 in smtp_client_open () from
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-lda.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x00000008009943ab in
2004 Dec 14
0
[CentOS-devel] Re: Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4 (fwd)
...edure should make sure that there are no
> obvious problems (like the comps issue of 3.3).
agreed
> * Idea: automatic patch building.
> It should be possible to build most patches without intervention. I
> don't know what the current systems in place are but if there were
> autobuilt unsigned patches available it would allow
> - testing of patches before they are 'officially' released
> - checking the progress if a patch
agreed - there is no automatic system at present.
Thanks for your input - great
Regards
Lance
--
uklinux.net -
The ISP of choice for the di...