Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "attrassign".
Did you mean:
arrassign
2000 Apr 25
0
Wrong SEs in predict.lm(..., type="terms")
...21 0.4952442
[8] 0.7428664 0.9904885
Here is what one should get:
> abs((df$x-mean(df$x)))*summary(df.lm)$coef[2,2]
[1] 0.5769836 0.4327377 0.2884918 0.1442459 0.0000000 0.1442459 0.2884918
[8] 0.4327377 0.5769836
Here is the corrected code:
if (type=="terms"){
asgn <- attrassign(object)
beta<-coef(object)
hasintercept<-attr(tt,"intercept")>0
if (hasintercept)
asgn$"(Intercept)"<-NULL
nterms<-length(asgn)
predictor<-matrix(ncol=nterms,nrow=NROW(X))
dimnames(predictor)<-list(rownames(X),name...
2000 Apr 26
0
Wrong SEs in predict.lm(..., type="terms") (PR#528)
...428664 0.9904885
Here is what one should get:
> abs((df$x-mean(df$x)))*summary(df.lm)$coef[2,2]
[1] 0.5769836 0.4327377 0.2884918 0.1442459 0.0000000 0.1442459 0.2884918
[8] 0.4327377 0.5769836
Here is the relevant section of corrected code:
if (type=="terms"){
asgn <- attrassign(object)
beta<-coef(object)
hasintercept<-attr(tt,"intercept")>0
if (hasintercept)
asgn$"(Intercept)"<-NULL
nterms<-length(asgn)
predictor<-matrix(ncol=nterms,nrow=NROW(X))
dimnames(predictor)<-list(rownames(X),name...
1998 Apr 17
2
R-beta: lmsreg
Does R have a function like the S(plus) function, lmsreg, Least Median
of Squares Regression? I am using R-0.61.
Thank you,
Mike Fleming
mfleming at nass.usda.gov
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or
1998 Apr 17
2
R-beta: lmsreg
Does R have a function like the S(plus) function, lmsreg, Least Median
of Squares Regression? I am using R-0.61.
Thank you,
Mike Fleming
mfleming at nass.usda.gov
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or
1999 Aug 30
3
model.matrix()
Hi,
In R I get the following:
> x <- 1:9
> f <- as.factor(1:9)
> i <- model.matrix(~x+f)
>
> attr(i, "assign")
[1] 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
whereas in S I get the following:
> attr(i, "assign")
$"(Intercept)":
[1] 1
$x:
[1] 2
$f:
[1] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Has anybody written a model.matrix function to get the same
result as S?