search for: assumt

Dear All, I've a question about scaling the input variables for an analysis with svm (package e1071). Most of my variables are factors with 4 to 6 levels but there are also some numeric variables. I'm not familiar with the math behind svms, so my assumtions maybe completely wrong ... or obvious. Will the svm automatically expand the factors into a binary matrix? If I add numeric variables outside the range of 0 to 1 do I have to scale them to have 0 to 1 range? thanks a lot for help, +kind regards, Arne

Hello list we encounter a weird SSL issue with one of our dovecot (2.2.24 on Centos6) which we can only explain if our assumtion is correct Symptoms are that imaps connections (on port 993) suddenly get veeeery slow. Up to 180s for one connection with openssl s_client The thing we do not understand is that in the same time imap connections with starttls are just 1s. We can see that entropy on the affected system is not so...

Squid, a proxy, is by its nature, storing large amounts of relatively small files in it's cache. As config optins it's offering: # 'Level-1' is the number of first-level subdirectories which # will be created under the 'Directory'. The default is 16. # # 'Level-2' is the number of second-level subdirectories which # will be created under

Hi quite strange assumtion, but I have the feeling, that samba makes my NT-CLient crash (blue screen). I haven't found anything in the archives about such troubles. It dosn't matter whether sp3 is installed on the NT machine, nor does a specific samba version makes this behavior vanish, it's just that my samba...

...hain but 'cross-execute' appears to be ignored. At least that's what it looks like to me. The 'config' step fails complaining it can't find the python libraries but I suspect the process is failing to run the created arm code. Of course I could be way off of base with my assumtions. Maybe I'd be better off not using waf? Either way, any hints on cross-compiling samba4 greatly appreciated. Cheers, Mike. -- Any question is easy if you know the answer!

Hi Guys, Could anyone recommend some good reference papers for the TypeBasedAliasAnalysis pass? I am a beginner in the field and would like to read on some fundamentals on the subject before trying to make some sense out of the comments in the TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...iPXE gets it? I haven't thought of this possibility. > > Or am I misunderstanding you? > <<< > > I'm saying that "probably" iPXE is trigerring a new PXE sequence with a different arch but > the one that finally loads the new NBP is really the FW. My assumtion was that PXE booting works like this: 1 - ROM FW broadcasts a DCHP request 2 - ROM Receives a reply 'filename=ipxe.efi' 3 - ROM Loads 'ipxe.efi' through tftp 4 - ROM invokes the downloaded image 5 - iPXE starts and broadcasts a DHCP request 6 - iPXE receives the reply 'filen...

>> Do you (or the ogg vorbis community) understand how SBR works? There is >> info on http://www.codingtechnologies.de/technology/sbr.htm >> bnut I am guessing this infop is not enough to explain the technology. Robert Voigt: >I haven't heard about SBR before. After reading that webpage I can say the >following: [ . . . ] I don't think SBR will give an

Hello, I''m thinking about a setup that looks like this: - 2 headnodes with FC connectivity (OpenSolaris) - 2 backend FC srtorages (Disk Shelves with RAID Controllers presenting a huge 15 TB RAID5) - 2 datacenters (distance 1 km with dark fibre) - one headnode and one storage in each data center (Sorry for this ascii art :) ( Data Center 1) <--1km--> (Data

in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket -> keep token for sending with rate second bucket -> keep ctoken for sending with ceil rate Is it true?? may be i''m misunderstand about token/bucket thoery _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hello list we encounter a weird SSL issue with one of our dovecot (2.2.24 on Centos6) which we can only explain if our assumtion is correct :-) Symptoms are that imaps connections (on port 993) suddenly get veeeery slow. Up to 180s for one connection with openssl s_client The thing we do not understand is that in the same time imap connections with starttls are just 1s. We can see that entropy on the affected system is no...

On March 23, 2019 12:39:13 PM GMT+01:00, Tobi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >Hello list > >we encounter a weird SSL issue with one of our dovecot (2.2.24 on >Centos6) which we can only explain if our assumtion is correct >Symptoms are that imaps connections (on port 993) suddenly get veeeery >slow. Up to 180s for one connection with openssl s_client The thing we >do not understand is that in the same time imap connections with >starttls are just 1s. >We can see that entropy on the affec...

Hi, Great job on isolinux. I am using it for a little side project of my own, and want to make my own splash screen. I have GIMP for windows, is there anything else I need? I assumt a lss file is a type of gif or png or something. Thank you, Josh Byington

Hi, Just to be sure: Is there a dialplan function in Asterisk that parses custom "name-addr"-style SIP headers for me? If I wanted to do it right the syntax name-addr *(SEMI generic-param) is quite complex to parse in the dialplan using nothing but CUT(). It's so easy to make false assumtions about angle brackets (< >), whitespace (LWS), quotes (") around the display-name, character escaping etc. All of the applications of CUT() I have seen are way too simplistic. Example of how it could work: Set(addr=${SIP_PARSE_HEADER(${SIP_HEADER(P-Asserted-Identity)},addr-spec)});...

Anyone familiar with RHEV (Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization)? Any ideas on how to emulate this on CentOS? Thanks, Gene Poole -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110907/da5eea64/attachment.html>

...based on 3.3.0 and we're planning to upgrade to 3.4 version. We've tried upgrading fist the clients and we've tried with 3.4.0, 3.4.1 and 3.4.2qa2 but all of them caused the same error: Failed to get stripe-size So it seems as if 3.4 clients are not compatible to 3.3 volumes. Is this assumtion right? Is there any procedure to upgrade the gluster from 3.3 to 3.4 without stopping the service? Where are the compatibility limitations between these 2 versions? Any hint or link to documentation would be highly appreciated. Thank you in advance, Samuel. -------------- next part ----------...

Dear list, I've tried to search the archives but found nothing, although I may use the wrong wording in my searches. I've also double-checked the upData function in Hmisc, but it does something else. I'm wondering if one can update a dataframe by "forcing into" it a shorter dataframe containing the corrections, like the "update" provided in SAS data steps.

...ly when mixing values created using the global context and other stuff created using the context object on the stack of threads? I guess that I am trying to say that it seems to me that the 2.5 API is more prone to synchronization issues than the interim 2.6 version of the API. The reason for this assumtion is that it seemed clear which context object governed the lifetime of all llvm related objects. So why not support the newer interim 2.6 API as well? Anybody willing to spell out what the rules will be for using LLVM for multi-threaded JITting? Thanks. Kind regards, Maurice > -Chris &gt...

...0,0/pci8086,3410 at 9/pci1000,3140 at 0/sd at 7,0:a brw-r----- 1 root sys 230, 640 Feb 7 13:28 /devices/pci at 0,0/pci8086,3410 at 9/pci1000,3140 at 0/sd at 7,0:a Strange ?? - a "ls" created device links. Is this normal ? When I run "format" now, I can see all 24 disks. My assumtion is that only the device files are missing, however the device (in kernel) is there and used. How can ZFS use a device that does not exist on the system ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...d Is it important to specify sc (Service curve) in all leaf class ?? and in all leaf class must specify link-sharing (ls) too?? because i think after read HFSC theory about by default All leaf class(Service class) will use Link-sharing critirion for allocation bandwidth from Service curve (My assumtion think this calculation bandwidth is "m1" or "umax" -&gt;total bandwidth that can send at ceil rate??) and when total  delay are exceed to "demax" or "d" -&gt; it mean it''s time for HFSC to manage QoS to guarantee bandwidth and delay i...