Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "asmsch".
Did you mean:
asmstr
2010 Jul 12
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Start of SIMD Reorg
...hile running: grep DW_TAG_structure_type 2010-06-28-DbgLocalVar.c.tmp.s | count 2
[x86_64-off-dbg]: Expected 2 lines, got 0.
I am getting some additional failures with my patch that look
like this:
[x86_64-com-dbg]: FAIL: /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.modified.commit/llvm/trunk/test/FrontendC/2010-05-18-asmsched.c
[x86_64-com-dbg]: Failed with exit(1) at line 1
[x86_64-com-dbg]: while running: /cray/css/compiler/cost/tools/llvm-tools/llvm/install.trunk.commit.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -w /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.modified.commit/llvm/trunk/test/FrontendC/2010-05-18-asmsched.c...
2010 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Start of SIMD Reorg
Hi David,
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> Now that Bruno is putting in some AVX stuff, it's a good motivator to
> move my x86 SIMD reorg work into trunk (and got management to agree to
> prioritize it - Thanks Bruno! :) ).
>
> Attached is the first patch of many to accomplish this. The overall
> goal is to have all x86 SIMD
2010 Jul 09
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Start of SIMD Reorg
Now that Bruno is putting in some AVX stuff, it's a good motivator to
move my x86 SIMD reorg work into trunk (and got management to agree to
prioritize it - Thanks Bruno! :) ).
Attached is the first patch of many to accomplish this. The overall
goal is to have all x86 SIMD instructions share a set of common patterns
so that we can have a more maintainable machine description (e.g. SS,
SD,