search for: asmo

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "asmo".

Did you mean: asm
2007 Sep 21
2
Poweraware 5115, ttyS0, Ubuntu 6.06.1
...0.0.0.0/0 ACL localhost 127.0.0.1/32 ACCEPT localhost REJECT all c. upsd.users [monuser] password = usermon allowfrom = localhost upsmon master d. upsmon.conf [clip] MONITOR powerware at localhost 1 monuser usermon master SHUTDOWNCMD "/sbin/shutdown -h +0" [more clip] Best regards Asmo Koskinen.
2007 Sep 21
2
Poweraware 5115, ttyS0, Ubuntu 6.06.1
...0.0.0.0/0 ACL localhost 127.0.0.1/32 ACCEPT localhost REJECT all c. upsd.users [monuser] password = usermon allowfrom = localhost upsmon master d. upsmon.conf [clip] MONITOR powerware at localhost 1 monuser usermon master SHUTDOWNCMD "/sbin/shutdown -h +0" [more clip] Best regards Asmo Koskinen.
2007 Dec 13
4
Lustre drawback
Hello everybody, at the following pages: http://www.rit.edu/~rc/docs/Survey_of_Clustered_Parallel_File_Systems_004_LANL.ppt http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/dc/tools/threading/238284.htm?page=2 I read: "[...] Currently, one additional drawback to Lustre is that a Lustre client cannot be on a server that is providing OSTs. This solution is being worked on and may be available soon. [...]" Is that currently true? I mean, the client ca...
2008 May 27
3
MKL Patch
And here's a patch for Intel Math Kernel Library. This allows commercial users of Speex to use a high-speed FFT library that isn't GPL'd. (You do need to pay for it though). This is 3 times faster than the default FFT in speex, and also faster than FFTW3 since MKL has native support for the complex packing Speex uses. Since Intel hasn't supplied any pkg-config files, and which
2008 May 27
5
MKL Patch
...ter than FFTW3 since MKL has native support for the >> complex packing Speex uses. >> > > That's definitely cool, but from what I can see on this FAQ I do need to pay > if I'm willing to use it for commercial purposes: > http://www.intel.com/cd/software/products/asmo-na/eng/266854.htm > > Btw, have you benchmarked speex with this and without this optimization > as a hole and how much percents do you achieve? I assume FFT is a big > portion of Speex's CPU load, but it would be great to see numbers. :) > > Yes, MKL is commercial software...
2008 Jul 18
0
Starcraft + wine 1.1.1 @ FreeBSD 7.0
...r it doesn't hang. I installed Stronghold Crousader on FreeBSD using wine and it seems to work fine. I installed some linux games (unreal tournament 2004, unreal tournament, tuxracer) and I suppose that DRI works rather fine. My VGA is Radeon 9600 mobile. The driver is radeon. > > [asmo at t42:~]% dmesg | grep drm > drm0: <ATI Radeon RV350 Mobility 9600 M10 NP> on vgapci0 > info: [drm] AGP at 0xd0000000 256MB > info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.25.0 20060524 > info: [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map > info: [drm] Loading R300 Microcode > in...
2009 Apr 03
3
Wine IA64 (Itanium) build
I always assumed Wine wasnt available on ia64 (note not x64), it certainly hasnt been in the last few Ubuntu ia64 releases when I checked. However Ive read a couple of posts and articles (some dating years back- http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-ivit.html) of people running it so I tried to compile. I can get it to ./configure, but make immediately dumps me to:
2008 Oct 28
0
No vmx flag for Intel T9400
...t_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm localhost ~ # Intel confirms that Core 2 Duo T9400 supports Intel® Virtualization Technology (table: "Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor Features"): http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/reseller/asmo-na/eng/products/mobile/processors/core2duo_m/feature/index.htm Is there any thing I might do wrong compiling Xen kernels? I wanted to start Windows HVM and I think without vmx it won''t start or would it? Why under Xen kernel only the second core has "up" flag? I have other mac...
2008 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] Unwinds Gone Wild
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > > Can anyone tell me if invoke/unwind is stable in 2.3? I'm seeing some > > really weird stuff -- unwinds are ending up in seemingly arbitrary > places... > > definitely not inside the caller's unwind block My target is x86. > > codegen doesn't know how to