search for: asite

...minlength = 5))) I want my data to be represented just in the same way. But when I try it like this: ayield = c(2,3,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,2,3,5,6,1,2,3,4,2,6,8) avariety = c(rep("A",5),rep("B",5),rep("C",5),rep("D",5)) ayear = (c(rep(1931,10),rep(1932,10))) asite = c(rep(c("iu","gt","jt","jhzt","tr"),4)) abarley = data.frame(cbind(ayield,avariety,ayear,asite)) barchart(ayield ~ avariety | asite, data = abarley,groups = ayear, layout = c(1,5) ) it looks totaly different and I get the error message: "x...

Hello Folks, I am looking for official centos 6 x86_64 AMI's for the Singapore region. I found an ebs backed Centos image from http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS (ami-3e22616c) in the market place <https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/ordering/ref=dtl_psb_continue?ie=UTF8&pr oductId=adc4348e-1dc3-41df-b833-e86ba57a33d6&region=ap-southeast-1> . However I am unable to find

Hi Asit, thanks for the reply. But I guess I was not clear in my question. Actually, i dont want to use __ATTRIBUTE__((ANNOTATE("MOVIATTR"))), since in documentation it is stated that "This intrinsic allows annotation of local variables with arbitrary strings. This can be useful for special purpose optimizations that want to look for these annotations. These have no other

Hi John, I have looked into the EmitAutoVarAlloca() in CGDecl.cpp. However, I could not figure out how to employ my custom attribute for code generation. For example, my custom attribute is visible in CGDecl.cpp but how can I generate based on my custom attribute if (D.hasAttr<myCustomAttri>()) { //What to do here? } What I wan in IR is something like below. Without Custom Attribute:

Dear all, I'm new to the LLVM world and I'm trying to run reproduce the hello world example described here http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.1/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. I started with a fresh new llvm-3.8.1 installation based on cmake (running on Linux x86) using the following command: cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/path/to/llvm -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86" ../ The build

Set guest selectors to be null if it''s not valid when switch to protected-mode in the guest firmware. Signed-off-by: Chengyuan Li <chengyuan.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com> Thanks, Chengyuan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi There. I am in the process of "upgrading" my Xen 2.0.7 server with a Xen 3.0.2, though I am doing so on a different machine. My firewall will be running as a DomU, asit also does on the existing server. The new server is Ubuntu 6.06 and the existing server is Debian Sarge. On the existing server, I have the WAN interface hidden from Dom0 with the two other physical interfaces

Hi, I installed the XRMS Open source CRM(xrms-2006-07-25-v1.99.2-.tar.gz) in the PC. Installed the CTI plugin inside as per the readme file inside /plugins/cti/README.txt(I am attaching that as well for the reference). I could not able to view the later development inside the application. Can anyone please share any idea how to approach for the configuration of *Asterisk CTI with XRMS in the

Hi All, I need your guidance about a custom attribute. I have defined one for variables. It is accepted in the source code (without any warnings from clang), for example in following snippet. #define NEWATTR __attribute__((moviAttr(1))) int main() { NEWATTR volatile unsigned int a = 5; volatile unsigned int *p; p = &a; return (a+*p); } and actually when I Dump the declaration, after

********************************************************************** CALL FOR PARTICIPATION ====================== The 8th IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing Karlsruhe, Germany June 14-18, 2011 http://icac2011.cis.fiu.edu

********************************************************************** CALL FOR PARTICIPATION ====================== The 8th IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing Karlsruhe, Germany June 14-18, 2011 http://icac2011.cis.fiu.edu

I have a Model event and the following two lines in routes.rb 1 - map.connect "events/:action", :controller => ''events'', :action => / [a-z_]+/i 2 - map.resources :events, :has_many => :comments, :has_one => :address #, :collection => {:mapit => :get} I have #1 so that I can call custom actions from a link_to_remote link from my index page t0 update a

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops