search for: asit

...minlength = 5))) I want my data to be represented just in the same way. But when I try it like this: ayield = c(2,3,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,2,3,5,6,1,2,3,4,2,6,8) avariety = c(rep("A",5),rep("B",5),rep("C",5),rep("D",5)) ayear = (c(rep(1931,10),rep(1932,10))) asite = c(rep(c("iu","gt","jt","jhzt","tr"),4)) abarley = data.frame(cbind(ayield,avariety,ayear,asite)) barchart(ayield ~ avariety | asite, data = abarley,groups = ayear, layout = c(1,5) ) it looks totaly different and I get the error message: "x...

...m/marketplace/ordering/ref=dtl_psb_continue?ie=UTF8&pr oductId=adc4348e-1dc3-41df-b833-e86ba57a33d6&region=ap-southeast-1> . However I am unable to find corresponding instance backed images. Can you help point me in the right direction for this? Thanks in advance for your help! - Asit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20130605/db7d0bce/attachment-0006.html>

Hi Asit, thanks for the reply. But I guess I was not clear in my question. Actually, i dont want to use __ATTRIBUTE__((ANNOTATE("MOVIATTR"))), since in documentation it is stated that "This intrinsic allows annotation of local variables with arbitrary strings. This can be useful for spe...

...r way to what you want to do, then do something > similar to that. > > John > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of >> Naveed Ul Mustafa via llvm-dev >> Sent: 25 November 2016 14:04 >> To: Asit Dhal >> Cc: Philip Reames via llvm-dev >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Translation of custom attribute (defined for >> variables) from clang to llvm >> >> Hi Asit, >> >> thanks for the reply. >> >> But I guess I was not clear in my question. Actua...

Dear all, I'm new to the LLVM world and I'm trying to run reproduce the hello world example described here http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.1/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. I started with a fresh new llvm-3.8.1 installation based on cmake (running on Linux x86) using the following command: cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/path/to/llvm -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86" ../ The build

Set guest selectors to be null if it''s not valid when switch to protected-mode in the guest firmware. Signed-off-by: Chengyuan Li <chengyuan.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com> Thanks, Chengyuan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi There. I am in the process of "upgrading" my Xen 2.0.7 server with a Xen 3.0.2, though I am doing so on a different machine. My firewall will be running as a DomU, asit also does on the existing server. The new server is Ubuntu 6.06 and the existing server is Debian Sarge. On the existing server, I have the WAN interface hidden from Dom0 with the two other physical interfaces plus a dummy interface tied to "untethered" bridges (as I also have physica...

...r the configuration of *Asterisk CTI with XRMS in the Windows* environment. as in the readme file of that package it's "it was under active development.". As I am new to this It will be of great help for me to get atleast the steps or any kind of source for that. Thanks in advance. Asit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090806/a20f492d/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- CTI / Asterisk Out Dial XRMS Plugin v0.1 uses the Asterisk Open Source Soft PBX from...

Hi All, I need your guidance about a custom attribute. I have defined one for variables. It is accepted in the source code (without any warnings from clang), for example in following snippet. #define NEWATTR __attribute__((moviAttr(1))) int main() { NEWATTR volatile unsigned int a = 5; volatile unsigned int *p; p = &a; return (a+*p); } and actually when I Dump the declaration, after

..., USA) Xiaoyun Zhu (VMware, USA) ADDITIONAL REVIEWERS: Paul Alcock Azman Ali Radovan Bruncak Daniel Chen Yuan Chen Xabriel J. Collazo-Mojica Javier Delgado Ciprian Docan Daniel Gmach Ajay Gulati Gabriela Jacques da Silva Matthew Jakeman Hyunjoo Kim Solomon Lasluisa Andreas Louca Angelos Marnerides Asit K Mishra Philip P. Moltmann Nithin M. Nakka Antonio Pecchia Cuong Pham Andres Quiroz Junghwan Rhee Ivan Rodero Alberto Egon Schaeffer Filho Steven Simpson Paul Smith David Villegas Wade Vinson Zhikui Wang Joel Wolf Keun Soo Yim Fan Zhang ***********************************************************...

..., USA) Xiaoyun Zhu (VMware, USA) ADDITIONAL REVIEWERS: Paul Alcock Azman Ali Radovan Bruncak Daniel Chen Yuan Chen Xabriel J. Collazo-Mojica Javier Delgado Ciprian Docan Daniel Gmach Ajay Gulati Gabriela Jacques da Silva Matthew Jakeman Hyunjoo Kim Solomon Lasluisa Andreas Louca Angelos Marnerides Asit K Mishra Philip P. Moltmann Nithin M. Nakka Antonio Pecchia Cuong Pham Andres Quiroz Junghwan Rhee Ivan Rodero Alberto Egon Schaeffer Filho Steven Simpson Paul Smith David Villegas Wade Vinson Zhikui Wang Joel Wolf Keun Soo Yim Fan Zhang ***********************************************************...

...saved. If I uncomment the regular event route i.e. #1, then I still get the same error with the map link but now I can create and save new event records. Any ideas? the events controller ***************************************************** def mapit # render :text => "asit" respond_to do format.js { render :update do |page| page.replace_html "div_map", "<p>Map here</p>" end } end end def new @event = Event.new addr...

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops