search for: asics

Hi, I'm having lots of difficulties with BCM5719, which is the default network card of HP Proliant DL 360 G8 servers. I can get a few ping replies before I get a couple of these: bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting Then everything hangs. Can not log in using ssh.

Hi. I got this on today's RELENG_6 with Broadcom BCM5722 A0, ASIC rev. 0xa200. >From dmesg (bge related): bge0: <Broadcom BCM5722 A0, ASIC rev. 0xa200> mem 0xe8400000-0xe840ffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x4b657654 bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x4b657654 bge0: EEPROM read timed out bge0: failed to read EEPROM device_attach:

Asic-technologies.com We make ASIC Bitcoin Mining Gear using the ASIC chips Sourced from Taiwan. 3.1 -3.3 GHash/sec 4 Board (has 32 chips) - 15 BTC 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 12 Board (has 96 chips) - 30 BTC Each module board uses about 39 Watts of power. Mining board's supplied (No case) power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled (suggest that you insert board's into a

Asic-technologies.com We make ASIC Bitcoin Mining Gear using the ASIC chips Sourced from Taiwan. 3.1 -3.3 GHash/sec 4 Board (has 32 chips) - 15 BTC 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 12 Board (has 96 chips) - 30 BTC Each module board uses about 39 Watts of power. Mining board's supplied (No case) power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled (suggest that you insert board's into a

Hi, this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board, Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x5720000 bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0 bge0: CHIP ID 0x05720000; ASIC REV 0x5720; CHIP REV 0x57200; PCI-E miibus0: <MII bus> on bge0 ... I have connected the ethernet to port labeled 0, but it appears as bge2, how can this be corrected? thanks, danny

I'm experiencing similar problems with a 3C996-T under 4.8-REL. In particular, connecting a 4.8-REL machine to a 5.1-REL machine leads to some interesting situations: I can do simple pings across the link, but ssh fails, and heavy pings crash the 4.8 machine. Similarly changing the interface configuration with ifconfig tends to crash the 4.8 machine (mtu, link0, up/down, etc). The

Hello everyone -- I am stumped on this issue, mostly because I'm not quite sure if it's behaving correctly or not. I believe this used to work and right now I'm not quite sure why it's no longer doing so and how to fix it (if possible). I suspect it is because of my recent update of the OS and Samba version. When users are trying to follow a symlink that goes to a different

From: Harald Finn?s > You seem to know what you're talking about, Seems v. Knows is a whole new ballgame. But I have been deploying SCSI on Linux since 1993 (Advansys, now owned by LSI, was the first vendor to formally support Linux), SCSI RAID on Linux since 1997 (large ICP-Vortex), through 3Ware's original FPGA ASIC designs in the AccelATA and Escalade 5000 series in 1999+. For a

Hi all, Here are some thoughts on Vorbis framing, which may make it easier to stream Vorbis in real time. The suggested changes also move more audio data closer to the beginning of each page. A note in the Vorbis framing spec suggests a simple 'bandwidth limited' mode whereby important information is placed at the front of each page and the end of each page is discarded. When operating

Okay, this problem is solved. It turns out when I was doing the wide links and unix extensions option it really was working. It wasn't until I logged out and logged back in to the client to get a fresh smb connection that it worked. So I'm good. Thanks for the help everyone. I appreciate it. Kathy On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Kathy <banshee135 at gmail.com> wrote: >

We recently bought a 32-bit Xeon system with a 12-port 3Ware RAID card and a dozen 500GB drives. We wanted to create 4TB drive arrays; however, we soon discovered that there is about a 2.2TB drive array size limit on 32-bit hardware. Does that sound correct? Would replacing the 32-bit mobo/cpu with a 64-bit mobo/cpu allow us to use drive arrays larger than 2.2TB? Thanks.

Well this is new. I haven't a clue what Dell has done on this R620, but this popped up today after I did a boat load of BIOS updates and tried to install stable/9 from our yahoo tree. If anyone sees the obvious solution here, I'd love to figure it out. found-> vendor=0x14e4, dev=0x165f, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=2, slot=0, func=1 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1

Hi, A day or so after starting samba, some daemons (diferent forks) begin to hang. Then, the WinXP clients hang too completely. When I try to figure out what is happen, I see that smbd daemons hangs always in a fcntl64() call: # strace -p 6414 Process 6414 attached - interrupt to quit fcntl64(14, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=3684, len=1} <unfinished ...> Process 6414

...fence > - * > - * @rdev: radeon_device pointer > - * @ring: ring index the fence is associated with > + * radeon_fence_check_signaled - callback from fence_queue > * > - * Checks the current fence value and wakes the fence queue > - * if the sequence number has increased (all asics). > + * this function is called with fence_queue lock held, which is also > used > + * for the fence locking itself, so unlocked variants are used for > + * fence_signal, and remove_wait_queue. > */ > -void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > +static...

Am 19.05.2014 15:35, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 19-05-14 14:30, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> [SNIP] >>>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way >>>>

Hi Everyone, Has anyone had any experience of using the Promise FastTrak SX4000 or SuperTrak SX6000 IDE RAID Controllers under Centos (if it matters I'm using version 4). I've seen it listed on linuxcompatible.org as working but would prefer to find out any first-hand experince before I buy. I'm looking to build a new mini server based on Mini-ITX and have found a great 1U case

...fence > + * radeon_fence_check_signaled - callback from fence_queue > * > - * @rdev: radeon_device pointer > - * @ring: ring index the fence is associated with > - * > - * Checks the current fence value and wakes the fence queue > - * if the sequence number has increased (all asics). > + * this function is called with fence_queue lock held, which is also used > + * for the fence locking itself, so unlocked variants are used for > + * fence_signal, and remove_wait_queue. > */ > -void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > +static int r...

...radeon_fence_process - process a fence - * - * @rdev: radeon_device pointer - * @ring: ring index the fence is associated with + * radeon_fence_check_signaled - callback from fence_queue * - * Checks the current fence value and wakes the fence queue - * if the sequence number has increased (all asics). + * this function is called with fence_queue lock held, which is also used + * for the fence locking itself, so unlocked variants are used for + * fence_signal, and remove_wait_queue. */ -void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) +static int radeon_fence_check_signaled(wa...

After a variety of connectivity problems, my itsp (Unlimitel.ca) blamed the problem on the IAX protocol. They told me that as of Asterisk 1.4 the IAX protocol went downhill and many carriers (like VoicePulse) are discontinuing support for IAX. Is this correct? We are all heading for SIP? Thanks, MD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi folks, I'm getting these messages when compiling 2.2.4 on Solaris 7 with gcc version 2.95.3: % ./configure --with-utmp % make Compiling smbd/password.c smbd/password.c: In function `grab_server_mutex': smbd/password.c:1198: warning: passing arg 1 of `message_named_mutex' discards qualifiers from pointer target type Compiling lib/system.c lib/system.c: In function