search for: arosenberg

...the vs2003 ones, and someone with VS2005 can easily import and use them. The only time that I have found that VS2005 project files need to be maintained over vs2003 ones is if multiple configurations for different platforms need to be maintained (i.e. for wince). On 11/27/07, Aron Rosenberg <arosenberg@sightspeed.com> wrote: Attached is a patch which adds the directory, project and solution files needed for Visual Studio 2008. They are an import of the 2005 files, but fixed and tested. -Aron Aron Rosenberg SightSpeed Inc. _______________________________________________ Speex-dev ma...

Ok! If there are indeed cross-compiling targets defined, then vs2005 projects probably should be maintained. In any case, this is all up to Jean-Marc, since he's the one that actually has authority to change it :) Jean-Marc -- what's your opinion? On 11/28/07, Aron Rosenberg <arosenberg@sightspeed.com> wrote: > > I pulled the test directory from 2003, but everything else from 2005. The > 2005 files have more "cross-compiling" targets than the 2003 ones. I fixed > the various missing files in the new 2008 projects (misc.c and one other > other are gone...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex_vs2008.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 165590 bytes Desc: speex_vs2008.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20071127/08917736/speex_vs2008-0001.obj

...s the vs2003 ones, and someone with VS2005 can easily import and use them. The only time that I have found that VS2005 project files need to be maintained over vs2003 ones is if multiple configurations for different platforms need to be maintained (i.e. for wince). On 11/27/07, Aron Rosenberg <arosenberg@sightspeed.com> wrote: > > Attached is a patch which adds the directory, project and solution files > needed for Visual Studio 2008. They are an import of the 2005 files, but > fixed and tested. > > > > -Aron > > Aron Rosenberg > > SightSpeed Inc. > > &...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex_vs2008_part2.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 11265 bytes Desc: speex_vs2008_part2.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20071128/136ce70d/speex_vs2008_part2-0001.obj

...osting my trivial Speex client that shows how to use Speex with the echo canceller, preprocessor and jitter buffer. It's in svn at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/speexclient/ ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:31:20 -0800 From: "Aron Rosenberg" <arosenberg@sightspeed.com> Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2 To: <speex-dev@xiph.org> Message-ID: <C214D66711999F4796CA19A15E7323533846E6@mail.sightspeed.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" It would be nice to merge the Run-Time SSE/Altiv...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: kissfftr_exit2.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 429 bytes Desc: kissfftr_exit2.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20061109/183092f6/kissfftr_exit2.obj

It would be nice to merge the Run-Time SSE/Altivec patch that we have been maintaining. Aron Rosenberg SightSpeed Inc. -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:32 AM To: speex-dev Subject: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2 Hi everyone, As you may have guess, Speex 1.2 is

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex_addpreprocessreset.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1666 bytes Desc: speex_addpreprocessreset.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20071205/5072210d/speex_addpreprocessreset.obj