Findlay, Dave
2006-Nov-13 18:49 UTC
[Speex-dev] RE 2. Quick survey for Speex 1.2 (Jean-Marc Valin)
I wish Speex could come with instructions on how to build libspeex_armce.lib.
________________________________
From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org on behalf of speex-dev-request@xiph.org
Sent: Mon 11/13/2006 3:01 PM
To: speex-dev@xiph.org
Subject: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 15
Send Speex-dev mailing list submissions to
speex-dev@xiph.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
speex-dev-request@xiph.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
speex-dev-owner@xiph.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Speex-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Speex AEC AND preprocessor (Aymeric Moizard)
2. Quick survey for Speex 1.2 (Jean-Marc Valin)
3. RE: Quick survey for Speex 1.2 (Aron Rosenberg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:33:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Aymeric Moizard <jack@atosc.org>
Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex AEC AND preprocessor
To: speex-dev@xiph.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0611131917550.29158@sip2>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
I'm working on the echo canceller with the SVN, with Windows Mobile 5
PocketPC.
Obviously, I can't make it run correctly.
My question: If I use the SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_ECHO_STATE, I have
changes in the sound: noise seems to be removed.
I want to know if I have to use the preprocessor AND that option
to make the echo canceller to work or if it's optionnal?
Is there any other usefull option to the preprocessor that can
be needed or helpfull?
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:32:28 +1100
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
Subject: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2
To: speex-dev <speex-dev@xiph.org>
Message-ID: <45583BAC.7060502@usherbrooke.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi everyone,
As you may have guess, Speex 1.2 is slowly approaching, though there's
still a lot left to do so I can't say how long it'll take. I thought
this was the right time to ask if there's anything missing or that can
be improved to make 1.2 better. At this point, it can't be anything
major, but there are still some changes that are possible, e.g:
- Improving some component that doesn't behave very well.
- Improving a confusing API.
- Improving robustness of a component to a specific condition
- Adding a minor feature
...
So what's your favourite "I wish Speex could..." or "Speex
sucks
because..."? I won't promise I'll take everything into account, but
I'll
do my best -- if not for 1.2, then maybe for 1.4. Oh, and no I will not
make Speex compatible with G.729 :-)
Jean-Marc
P.S. I finally got around to posting my trivial Speex client that shows
how to use Speex with the echo canceller, preprocessor and jitter
buffer. It's in svn at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/speexclient/
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:31:20 -0800
From: "Aron Rosenberg" <arosenberg@sightspeed.com>
Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2
To: <speex-dev@xiph.org>
Message-ID:
<C214D66711999F4796CA19A15E7323533846E6@mail.sightspeed.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
It would be nice to merge the Run-Time SSE/Altivec patch that we have
been maintaining.
Aron Rosenberg
SightSpeed Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On
Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:32 AM
To: speex-dev
Subject: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2
Hi everyone,
As you may have guess, Speex 1.2 is slowly approaching, though there's
still a lot left to do so I can't say how long it'll take. I thought
this was the right time to ask if there's anything missing or that can
be improved to make 1.2 better. At this point, it can't be anything
major, but there are still some changes that are possible, e.g:
- Improving some component that doesn't behave very well.
- Improving a confusing API.
- Improving robustness of a component to a specific condition
- Adding a minor feature
...
So what's your favourite "I wish Speex could..." or "Speex
sucks
because..."? I won't promise I'll take everything into account, but
I'll
do my best -- if not for 1.2, then maybe for 1.4. Oh, and no I will not
make Speex compatible with G.729 :-)
Jean-Marc
P.S. I finally got around to posting my trivial Speex client that shows
how to use Speex with the echo canceller, preprocessor and jitter
buffer. It's in svn at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/speexclient/
_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
End of Speex-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 15
*****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 8565 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20061113/ecfbd439/attachment-0001.bin
Jean-Marc Valin
2006-Nov-13 19:01 UTC
[Speex-dev] RE 2. Quick survey for Speex 1.2 (Jean-Marc Valin)
Findlay, Dave wrote:> I wish Speex could come with instructions on how to build libspeex_armce.lib.I guess this one comes down to whether someone's interested in managing a build for that platform. I don't have access to an ARM, so there's nothing I can do here. I just do Linux and illi does Win32 when he has time. If someone steps in with binaries for platform XYZ, I can include them in the release. Jean-Marc