search for: arm926

Hi, I am trying to natively compile LLVM on a ARM virtual machine ( which I am running through QEMU) but getting the error as mentioned in previous mail. VM is running ARM926 which according to ARM architecture, has vfp support. Do some changes need to me made in LLVM distribution to make it run on ARM platforms Thanks --Kapil On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Xerxes Rånby <xerxes at zafena.se> wrote: > Hi Kapil! > > LLVM both builds and runs fine on A...

Hi Kapil! LLVM both builds and runs fine on ARM Linux. I am running a public buildbot for the llvm project that are compiling and testing llvm on arm-linux daily and this machine are running Ubuntu Jaunty. http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux I have successfully compiled LLVM on ARM using GCC 4.3.3 on a Ubuntu Jaunty system and GCC 4.4 on a Ubuntu Karmic system. Do you use

Hi, I'm currently working on the TI DaVinci processor, which has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I have been using Speex 6kbps (narrowband, quality=2, complexity=1, perceptual_enh=0) on the DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the 4kbps mode (changing quality to...

...arc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: Andy Ngo <ndno72-speex@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 3:52:33 PM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] 4kbps sounds robotic on TMS320C64 > I'm currently working on the TI DaVinci processor, which has an > ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I have been using Speex > 6kbps (narrowband, quality=2, complexity=1, perceptual_enh=0) on the > DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such > a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the > 4kbps mode (...

Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight or comment you may give me or point...

...For the encoding I found that 20ms of sample voice takes 13ms to be encoded. The goal of my project is to built an VoIP application based on ARM966E but with the actually performance it's not possible :( My question is what is approximately the speex encoding time with narrowband mode on ARM9 (ARM926 or ARM966), and please did anyone had made a benchmarking about MPU speex consummation. Thank you for all. Best Regards Seif -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080117/843688a6/attachment.htm

Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight or comment you may give me or point...

...arc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: Andy Ngo <ndno72-speex@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 3:52:33 PM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] 4kbps sounds robotic on TMS320C64 > I'm currently working on the TI DaVinci processor, which has an > ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I have been using Speex > 6kbps (narrowband, quality=2, complexity=1, perceptual_enh=0) on the > DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such > a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the > 4kbps mode (...

Hi, I've been trying to get Speex to compile and run on the DSP of TI's new DaVinci System-On-Chip processor, which has both an ARM (ARM926) and a DSP (C64+, based on the C6400). I used the latest code (1.2beta) and followed the example in the speex- 1.2beta1/ti/speex_C64_test trunk to build the Speex library for the DSP. Basically I have a loopback application on the ARM that samples 8kHz 16-bit mono frames, gives them to the DSP to...

...conditionally linked instead of their C versions based on OC_ARM_ASM define. Undefining OC_ARM_ASM in these C functions and relinking the original set of assembler object files finally yielded a usable library. The resulting libtheora.so was noticeably faster than its C-only version on an ARM926 device, so this would be worthwhile to pursue. If interested I can post patches when I get back to my workstation. However I'd like to avoid any further confusion or unnecessary effort if there's active development in this branch. --Dave Milici

...half Of ndno72-speex@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:18 PM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci processor Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight or comment you may give me or point...

...cific switches. The main thing I see that *could* cause problem is the 16-bit chars in the bitpacker. Jean-Marc Andy Ngo a ?crit : > Hi, > > I've been trying to get Speex to compile and run on the DSP of TI's new DaVinci System-On-Chip processor, which has both an ARM > (ARM926) and a DSP (C64+, based on the C6400). I used the latest code (1.2beta) and followed the example in the speex- > 1.2beta1/ti/speex_C64_test trunk to build the Speex library for the DSP. Basically I have a loopback application on the ARM that > samples 8kHz 16-bit mono frames, gives them to...

...riday, December 01, 2006 5:18 PM To: > speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci > processor > > Hi, > > My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and > I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an > ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex > somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was > wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working > on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight > or comment you...

...Of ndno72-speex@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:18 PM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci processor Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight or comment you may give me or point...

...roken. Don't use it; compile qemu from source instead. (2) You have to configure libguestfs to pass extra qemu options. Currently you should use: PATH=/path/to/your/qemu/arm-softmmu:$PATH \ ./autogen.sh \ --with-qemu=qemu-system-arm \ --with-qemu-options="-M versatilepb -cpu arm926" (3) The versatilepb emulated system only supports memory < 512MB, and will only boot the standard kernel, so when running you need something like this: FEBOOTSTRAP_KERNEL=/boot/vmlinuz-3.3.4-4.fc17.armv7hl \ FEBOOTSTRAP_MODULES=/lib/modules/3.3.4-4.fc17.armv7hl \ LIBGUESTFS_MEMSIZE=256 \...

> > $ qemu-arm -cpu ? > > Available CPUs: > > arm926 arm946 arm1026 arm1136 arm1136-r2 arm1176 arm11mpcore > > cortex-m3 > > cortex-a8 > > cortex-a8-r2 cortex-a9 cortex-a15 ti925t pxa250 sa1100 sa1110 > pxa255 pxa260 > > pxa261 pxa262 pxa270 pxa270-a0 pxa270-a1 pxa270-b0 pxa270-b1 xa270- > c0 > > pxa27...

On 12/16/14 3:53 AM, Kristof Beyls wrote: > I've been wondering too about how to get better ARM v6m compile-and-execute > testing going. > > As you say Jon, the non-execution-based regression tests are surprisingly > good at catching issues; but they're no full substitute for executing the > code produced by the backend for a reasonably-sized test suite. > > If

...PM To: >> speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci >> processor >> >> Hi, >> >> My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and >> I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an >> ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex >> somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was >> wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working >> on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight >>...

...cific switches. The main thing I see that *could* cause problem is the 16-bit chars in the bitpacker. Jean-Marc Andy Ngo a ?crit : > Hi, > > I've been trying to get Speex to compile and run on the DSP of TI's new DaVinci System-On-Chip processor, which has both an ARM > (ARM926) and a DSP (C64+, based on the C6400). I used the latest code (1.2beta) and followed the example in the speex- > 1.2beta1/ti/speex_C64_test trunk to build the Speex library for the DSP. Basically I have a loopback application on the ARM that > samples 8kHz 16-bit mono frames, gives them to...

...Tungsten|E aka. Cheetah PDA (OMAP310) > collie Sharp SL-5500 (Collie) PDA (SA-1110) > connex Gumstix Connex (PXA255) > cubieboard cubietech cubieboard > highbank Calxeda Highbank (ECX-1000) > imx25-pdk ARM i.MX25 PDK board (ARM926) > integratorcp ARM Integrator/CP (ARM926EJ-S) > kzm ARM KZM Emulation Baseboard (ARM1136) > lm3s6965evb Stellaris LM3S6965EVB > lm3s811evb Stellaris LM3S811EVB > mainstone Mainstone II (PXA27x) > midway Calxeda...