search for: arch_vcpu

...nclude/asm-x86/domain.h index 9d39061..89b1adc 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h @@ -375,6 +375,12 @@ struct pv_vcpu spinlock_t shadow_ldt_lock; }; +struct pending_msix_unmask_info +{ + unsigned long ctrl_address; + bool_t valid; +}; + struct arch_vcpu { /* @@ -439,6 +445,8 @@ struct arch_vcpu /* A secondary copy of the vcpu time info. */ XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_time_info_t) time_info_guest; + + struct pending_msix_unmask_info pending_msix_unmask; } __cacheline_aligned; /* Shorthands to improve code legibility. */ diff --git...

...0_EL1); WRITE_SYSREG64(n->arch.ttbr1, TTBR1_EL1); if ( is_pv32_domain(n->domain) ) diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h index d5cae2e..2aa4443 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h @@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ struct arch_vcpu /* MMU */ register_t vbar; +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 uint32_t ttbcr; +#else + uint64_t ttbcr; +#endif uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; uint32_t dacr; /* 32-bit guests only */ -- 1.7.9.5

...86/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h index 9d39061..8292fdb 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h @@ -375,6 +375,11 @@ struct pv_vcpu spinlock_t shadow_ldt_lock; }; +struct pending_msix_unmask_info +{ + unsigned long ctrl_address; +}; + struct arch_vcpu { /* @@ -439,6 +444,8 @@ struct arch_vcpu /* A secondary copy of the vcpu time info. */ XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_time_info_t) time_info_guest; + + struct pending_msix_unmask_info pending_msix_unmask; } __cacheline_aligned; /* Shorthands to improve code legibility. */ diff --git...

Hi all, this small patch series implement guest SMP support for ARM, using the ARM PSCI interface for secondary cpu bringup. Stefano Stabellini (4): xen/arm: basic PSCI support, implement cpu_on xen/arm: support for guest SGI xen/arm: support vcpu_op hypercalls xen: move VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info to common code xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++

...007-08-08/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h =================================================================== --- 2007-08-08.orig/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h 2007-08-07 15:00:27.000000000 +0200 +++ 2007-08-08/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h 2007-08-08 11:37:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -285,6 +285,16 @@ struct arch_vcpu #endif #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 struct trap_bounce int80_bounce; + unsigned long syscall32_callback_eip; + unsigned long sysenter_callback_eip; + unsigned long sysexit_eip; + unsigned short syscall32_callback_cs; + unsigned short sysenter_callback_cs; + u...

...FINE(OFFSET_LOCAL_IRQ_COUNT, offsetof(struct irq_cpustat, __local_irq_count)); + DEFINE(OFFSET_NMI_COUNT, offsetof(struct irq_cpustat, __nmi_count)); + DEFINE(SIZE_IRQ_CPU_STAT, sizeof(struct irq_cpustat)); + BLANK(); + DEFINE(OFFSET_VCPU_INFO, offsetof(struct vcpu, vcpu_info)); + DEFINE(OFFSET_ARCH_VCPU, offsetof(struct vcpu, arch)); + BLANK(); + DEFINE(OFFSET_EVTCHN_UPCALL_MASK, offsetof(struct vcpu_info, evtchn_upcall_mask)); + DEFINE(OFFSET_EVTCHN_UPCALL_PENDING, offsetof(struct vcpu_info, evtchn_upcall_pending)); + DEFINE(OFFSET_ARCH_VCPU_INFO, offsetof(struct vcpu_info, arch)); + DEFINE(OFF...

Hello, This is the second version of this patch series. I only implement the VPF context switch support for arm32 and add dummy function to avoid compilation on arm64. I have switched the order of the patch because the old second one can be applied alone and the patch are cleaner :). For all the changes see each patch. Cheers, Julien Grall (2): xen/arm: don''t enable VFP on XEN

I''ve addressed all (I think/hope) of the review comments. The main change is to expose the guest virtual platform (e.g. memory layout and interrupt usage etc) to the toolstack via the public interface. This is then used during FDT generation. I have just codified the current defacto standard layout, it''s probably not the best layout but any change can be a separate patch/series.

Hello everyone, this is the fourth version of the patch series that introduces ARMv7 with virtualization extensions support in Xen. The series allows Xen and Dom0 to boot on a Cortex-A15 based Versatile Express simulator. See the following announce email for more informations about what we are trying to achieve, as well as the original git history: See

Hello everyone, this is the very first version of the patch series that introduces ARMv7 with virtualization extensions support in Xen. The series allows Xen and Dom0 to boot on a Cortex-A15 based Versatile Express simulator. See the following announce email for more informations about what we are trying to achieve, as well as the original git history: See

This round implements all of the review comments from V2 and all patches are now acked. Unless there are any objections I intend to apply later this morning. Ian.

Biggest change is to switch the new DTB node to /xen-core-devices instead of /xen at Stefano''s request. I also dropped the few patches title HACK etc which weren''t supposed to be there and fixed up some bits and pieces which folks commented on. George, WRT the freeze I think this is functionality which we cannot ship Xen 4.4 without. The impact is entirely constrained to the

Hi Keir: These two patches remove the need for netloop by performing the copying in netback and only if it is necessary. The rationale is that most packets will be processed without delay allowing them to be freed without copying at all. So instead of copying every packet destined to dom0 we''ll only copy those that linger longer than a specified amount of time (currently 0.5s). As it

This patch series is a reworking of a series developed by Mukesh Rathor at Oracle. The entirety of the design and development was done by him; I have only reworked, reorganized, and simplified things in a way that I think makes more sense. The vast majority of the credit for this effort therefore goes to him. This version is labelled v13 because it is based on his most recent series, v11.

First off, Apologies for the massive patch series... This series boots a 32-bit dom0 kernel to a command prompt on an ARMv8 (AArch64) model. The kernel is the same one as I am currently using with the 32 bit hypervisor I haven''t yet tried starting a guest or anything super advanced like that ;-). Also there is not real support for 64-bit domains at all, although in one or two places I