search for: ar6

...t location [SP+8] <fi #3> is 4 bytes at location [SP+12] <fi #4> is 4 bytes at location [SP+16] <fi #5> is 4 bytes at location [SP+20] <fi #6> is 4 bytes at location [SP+24] <fi #7> is 4 bytes at location [SP+28] entry (0x8065970, LLVM BB @0x805fde8): push %ar6, %gr6 %ar6 = move %ar7 %ar7 = + %ar7, 2 %ar6 = + %ar6, 12 store %ar6, %gr0 %ar6 = - %ar6, 12 %ar6 = + %ar6, 13 store %ar6, %gr1 %ar6 = - %ar6, 13 %ar6 = + %ar6, 14 store %ar6, %gr2 %ar6 = - %ar6, 14 %ar6 = + %ar6, 15 store %ar6, %gr3 %ar6 = - %ar6, 15 %ar6 = + %ar6, 16 store %ar6, %...

...%reg1025, %reg1024 %gr7 = move %reg1026 return .... which looks ok, but after register allocation and prolog/epilogue insertion, I get this: entry (0x8681458): ..... setcc %gr0, %gr1 goto %disp(label then) goto %disp(label else) %ar6 = + %ar6, 1 store %ar6, %gr0 %ar6 = - %ar6, 1 %ar6 = + %ar6, 2 store %ar6, %gr1 %ar6 = - %ar6, 2 The code after "goto" is disturbing. It looks like spill code, but it's not going to be ever executed. Any ideas why it's generated? Is there...

...If not, the second one is dead. > which looks ok, but after register allocation and prolog/epilogue insertion, I > get this: > > entry (0x8681458): > ..... > setcc %gr0, %gr1 > goto %disp(label then) > goto %disp(label else) > %ar6 = + %ar6, 1 > store %ar6, %gr0 > %ar6 = - %ar6, 1 > %ar6 = + %ar6, 2 > store %ar6, %gr1 > %ar6 = - %ar6, 2 > > The code after "goto" is disturbing. It looks like spill code, but it's not > going to be ever executed. Any i...

I'm using the fixed argument in arima. Shouldn't ar4, ar5, and ar6 display as zero in the output? Call: arima(x = window(log(hhprice), start = c(1990, 1), end = c(2003, 3)), order = c(7, 1, 0), xreg = window(ts.union(exa1 = lag(exa, -1), exa12 = lag(exa, -12), exb1 = lag(exb, -1), exc1 = lag(exc, -1), exc12 = lag(exc, -12)), start = c(1990, 1), end...

Hello , I have estimated the following model, a sarima: p=9 d=1 q=2 P=0 D=1 Q=1 S=12 In R 2.12.2 Call: arima(x = xdata, order = c(p, d, q), seasonal = list(order = c(P, D, Q), period = S), optim.control = list(reltol = tol)) Coefficients: ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ar8 ar9 0.3152 0.8762 -0.4413 0.0152 0.1500 0.0001 -0.0413 -0.1811 0.0646 s.e. 0.0865 0.0885 0.1141 0.1181 0.1196 0.1220 0.1120 0.0908 0.0865 ma1 ma2 sma1 -0.0221 -0.9779 -0.7635 s.e. 0.0539 0.0534 0.0834 sigma^2 estimated as...

...arima and the fit of diff(x) with an arma (same coeff p & d) differ one from another here are the output of R: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > modelarma<-arma(diff(x),c(7,5)) > modelarma Call: arma(x = diff(x), order = c(7, 5)) Coefficient(s): ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ma1 ma2 0.06078 -0.44774 0.41881 0.47624 0.01406 0.06565 -0.06167 -0.01294 0.31313 ma3 ma4 ma5 intercept -0.49027 -0.55461 -0.11520 -0.10692 > modelarima<-arima(x,c(7,1,5)) > modelarima Call: arima(x = x, order = c(7, 1, 5)) Coefficients: ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ma1 ma2 ma3 ma4...

Dear all, I need to compute the ACF (autocorrel) of an AR6 process, given the values of its parameters (w1,w2,w3,w4,w5,w6). First, I notice that there is an error as soon as the sum of the wi equals 1 : "Error in drop(.Call("La_dgesv", a, as.matrix(b), tol, PACKAGE = "base")) : system is computationally singular: reciproc...

Hello , I have estimated the following model, a sarima: p=9 d=1 q=2 P=0 D=1 Q=1 S=12 In R 2.12.2 Call: arima(x = xdata, order = c(p, d, q), seasonal = list(order = c(P, D, Q), period = S), optim.control = list(reltol = tol)) Coefficients: ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ar8 ar9 0.3152 0.8762 -0.4413 0.0152 0.1500 0.0001 -0.0413 -0.1811 0.0646 s.e. 0.0865 0.0885 0.1141 0.1181 0.1196 0.1220 0.1120 0.0908 0.0865 ma1 ma2 sma1 -0.0221 -0.9779 -0.7635 s.e. 0.0539 0.0534 0.0834 sigma^2 estimated as...

...(7, 0, 7), xreg = isr) : possible convergence problem: optim gave code=1 In this case, when you print the results from the arima model, the error message appears again: > reg Call: arima(x = y, order = c(7, 0, 7), xreg = isr) Coefficients: ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ma1 ma2 -0.3356 0.0282 -0.0124 0.0604 0.1608 0.7949 0.2286 0.4461 0.0099 s.e. NaN 0.2140 0.1711 0.2545 0.1547 0.0725 NaN NaN 0.1842 ma3 ma4 ma5 ma6 ma7 intercept isr 0.0841 0.0773 -0.054 -0.7227 -0.1322 6.143...

...000e+00 Inf <2e-16 *** ar1 8.897e-01 0.000e+00 Inf <2e-16 *** ar2 -3.386e-01 0.000e+00 -Inf <2e-16 *** ar3 3.339e-01 2.044e-17 1.634e+16 <2e-16 *** ar4 -4.406e-01 0.000e+00 -Inf <2e-16 *** ar5 3.924e-02 6.349e-18 6.182e+15 <2e-16 *** ar6 -5.184e-01 2.558e-17 -2.026e+16 <2e-16 *** ar7 8.988e-01 0.000e+00 Inf <2e-16 *** ar8 -7.568e-01 3.112e-16 -2.432e+15 <2e-16 *** ar9 3.442e-01 2.175e-22 1.582e+21 <2e-16 *** ma1 -1.190e-01 1.470e-18 -8.097e+16 <2e-16 *** ma2 -9.343e-02 0.000e+00 -Inf...

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

...When I use "smbmount command" mount remote directory of a samba server, the owner and group of mounted files is the use who mount it. How can I solve the problem? Return-Path: <drjung@sprynet.com> Delivered-To: samba@us5.samba.org Received: from usgrant.trismegistus.net (crtntx1-ar6-033-095.crtntx1.dsl.gtei.net [4.41.33.95]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158E453E for <samba@us5.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sprynet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by usgrant.trismegistus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A93143; W...