search for: apsl2

...quot;unquestionable good”? If we don’t achieve this, then we run the heightened risk of someone being sued for using LLVM. This isn’t good for the community. > (3) Revocation of copyright and patent use permissions in case of > litigation. I think this is the part about a potential move to APSL2 > that is most highly contented. That isn’t my impression. Everyone that I have spoken to is in favor of the patent termination clauses (including the FSF: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#apache2). The only complexity I’ve heard is that it introduces is a potential compati...

Hello everyone, This email is a continuation of a discussion from almost a year ago, started back here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html As described in that email, this is a complicated topic and deals with sensitive legal issues. I am not a lawyer, and this email is not intended to be legal advice in the formal sense. That said, I have spoken with many

...GCC has source code going back to 1983), and most things that happen get published. All of which makes it not a great target for NPEs. > > >> (3) Revocation of copyright and patent use permissions in case of > >> litigation. I think this is the part about a potential move to APSL2 > >> that is most highly contented. > > > > That isn’t my impression. Everyone that I have spoken to is in favor of > the patent termination clauses (including the FSF: > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#apache2). > > > > The only complexity...