search for: apl2

..... and need the ungrouped equivalent, where each input observation appears the number of times represented by its frequency. In SAS this would be data galton2; set galton; do i=1 to frequency; output; end; I can replicate this in R, but surely there must be an easier way. (In APL2 it would be frequency\[1]galton) thanks, -Michael -- Michael Friendly Email: friendly at yorku.ca Professor, Psychology Dept. York University Voice: 416 736-5115 x66249 Fax: 416 736-5814 4700 Keele Street http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/friendly.html Toronto, ONT M3J 1P3 CANADA

> On Oct 19, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:25:16AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> 1) We could introduce a novel legal solution. > > Please, no. > >> 2) We could require new contributors to sign the Apache CLA. > > To me, this is the most acceptable

...cularly the corporate one. Keep in mind that the majority of LLVM patches are from corporate contributors. > Second part is the mentioned issue of patents. Let's say a > non practicing entity submits a uboot patch to LLVM and later starts to > sue LLVM users. I'm not clear on the APL2 by itself would help resolve > this case. I am not going to argue about legal issues on a mailing list, and I am not a lawyer. However, the belief of the lawyers I have spoken with is that this is covered. > Third part is the re-licensing question. This might be in some cases the > most...

...d the ungrouped equivalent, where each input observation appears the number of times represented by its frequency. In SAS this would be data galton2; set galton; do i=1 to frequency; output; end; I can replicate this in R, but surely there must be an easier way. (In APL2 it would be frequency\[1]galton) thanks, -Michael -- Michael Friendly Email: friendly at yorku.ca Professor, Psychology Dept. York University Voice: 416 736-5115 x66249 Fax: 416 736-5814 4700 Keele Street http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/friendly.html Toronto, ONT M3J 1P3 CANAD...

...f one of the copyright holders doesn't agree? b. What audit procedure do you plan to use c. Legal costs??? Is Apple or Google going to pay the bill or is some poor non-profit going to get stuck with it d. What's the project downside i. Fragmentation from people who feel strongly against the APL2 license... ii. Lost cycles because people who could be writing code are pandering on about licensing

On 29 October 2015 at 10:25, Jonas Maebe via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the previously voiced concerns of incompatibilities between the > Apache and GPLv2 license, I'd like to add one more thing. > > I work on a, at this time mostly LLVM-unrelated [1], "GPLv2 or later" > licensed compiler: the Free Pascal Compiler. Some

Hi Everyone, I’d like to start a discussion about how to improve some important issues we have in the LLVM community, regarding our license and patent policy. Before we get started, I’d like to emphasize that *this is an RFC*, intended for discussion. There is no time pressure to do something fast here -- we want to do the right long-term thing for the community (though we also don’t want