search for: approved

On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 4 May 2015 at 21:55, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. > > There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from > > code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before > > the

Hello, I am working on some examples of GLMM for my students but I am afraid that my way of preparing a dataframe to pass to lmer will make them think that R is a very difficult and un-natural language. Here is for example a simple data set about approval ratings on two different surveys for a random sample of 1600 individuals. > ## Example: Ratings of prime minister (Agresti, Table 12.1,

...eally sure what is the process. The developer policy states: "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get approval, submit a patch <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you may commit it yourself." Do I have to send the patch to llvm-commits via email and wait for approval even when the patch has been accepted in the reviews (i.e. Phabricator) ? Best, Stefanos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists...

I have time-series data on approval ratings of British Prime Ministers. The prime ministers dating from MacMillan onward till today are coded as dummy variables and the approval ratings are entered for each month. I want to know the mean value of the approval rating of each Prime Minister in the dataset and the approval rating during his/her first month and last month as PM. What R code should

...n to cause message storm and this is taking way too much bandwidth on the list. As always, change is causing breakages until we all learn how to do it efficiently. I have now a way to identify the code owners. All I am asking is for the code owners to state clearly that the change they ask for is approved. Couple of examples from real e-mails: approved APPROVED *approved* Pawel P.S. I'll even take "I am the code owner and I approve this message!"

I just got back from Boston where we completed testing of the TE410P for FCC, Euro, and Australian approvals, and I'm happy to say we passed all our approvals (including Q.921 and Q.931 layers, i.e. libpri as well as surges) for both telco and leased line applications. Hopefully we'll have the official documents soon, but I know there are a lot of you out there that are happy to hear

nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on the APL, only RedHat and SuSE

Hi, I am considering installing several `servers' in a facility that needs to conform with the products listed at: DSD Approved Products http://www.dsd.gov.au/infosec/evaluation_services/epl/dap.html As far as i can see freebsd performs above and beyond, for all the required criteria in the act. Can we see freebsd listed as an approved product in the near future? Best Regards, Jason - RF & CO

..., 21 Dec 2015 22:25:53 -0800 From: syslinux-request at zytor.com Subject: confirm 6004e15a76ae57ee_scrambled_b718c9 If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact, Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line of the body of the reply. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven ------------- volgend deel ---------...

...is > taking way too much bandwidth on the list. As always, change is > causing breakages until we all learn how to do it efficiently. > I have now a way to identify the code owners. > > > All I am asking is for the code owners to state clearly that > the change they ask for is approved. Couple of examples > from real e-mails: > > > approved APPROVED *approved* what if there is no code owner? I sent you a reassociate patch. I may well be the person who knows reassociate best these days, but I'm not the code owner (there isn't one). Should Chris be asked to...

...ocess. > The developer policy states: > "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get > approval, submit a patch > <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits > <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you > may commit it yourself." > > Do I have to send the patch to llvm-commits via email and wait for > approval even when the patch has been accepted in the reviews (i.e. > Phabricator) ? > > > > Approval via Phabricator is fine. LLVM-commits (or the relevant sub...

I have started to read r-help on Gmane using Thunderbird as a reader. Before that I had messages sent to gmail account. The first post through Gmane needed moderator approval, but then I got a message from Your friendly autoauthorizer at Gmane.org saying You are now authorized to post to the gmane.comp.lang.r.general newsgroup. But my messages are still needing moderator approval, which I

Hi, I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before the start of 'official' testing. We had originally planed to start 'official' testing today, however a regression was found in the 3.6 branch, so I would like to

...to acheive approval for use in Australia within the next 2 months ? (when is the end of summer?). Once this is done, it will certainly suit larger installations, but it still leaves a number of 'gaps'. Anyone with analog phone lines will need either X101P or similar, or else an Australian approved channel bank. Since the X101P isn't approved, and doesn't appear to be approved soon, the chances of getting a Australian approved channel bank at a decent price is likely low. Again, with smaller offices (say 15 or less extensions) the price of a TE400P card is too expensive, will there b...

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 26 Nov 2014, at 16:50, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote: > ... > > I will try to look at the patches today. I'm going to delay the release a week > > or so, because of all the merge requests I've received,

...terpreting the answers. Some comments mentioned "if a review spawns a related change", which to me is a different review, and I've reviewed many of those cases. Most people use the Phab link to express relationship, but that's not a series. Others said "some patches may be approved before others" which only works in a series if they're from start to N, not N to M, nor M to the end, nor randomly approved. In this case, the series is split in two, with the latter having to be rebased on patches committed after the first part is, so essentially, creating a new series....

On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote: > nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on > the APL, only RedHat and SuSE DoD approval requires spending lots of money jumping through arbitrary hoops. Do you wish to pay for this? skimming the requirements, it also requires extensive documentation of said 'Product'. Do you wish to write thi...

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] Syslinux keyboard mappings > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you

Hello, I posted a question yesterday but I got no replies, so I'll try to reformulate it in a more concise way. I have the following data, summarizing approval ratings on two different surveys for a random sample of 1600 individuals: > ## Example: Ratings of prime minister (Agresti, Table 12.1, p.494) > rating <- matrix(c(794, 86, 150, 570), 2, 2) > dimnames(rating) <-

On 11/17/2012 6:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > >> I think that the code owner process is becoming complicated and I am not sure if it serves Chris's original intent. I don't think that we need to change every file nor do we need an automatic tool to find the owner. I think that a simple text