search for: apparentely

Dear group, I am nearly beside myself. After an entire night spent on a niggling little detail, I am no closer to to the truth. I loaded an Excel file in .csv form into R. It apparentely loads as a list, but not the kind of list you can use. Oh no, it converts into a list that cannot be converted into an integer, numeric, or vector, only a matrix, whihc is useless without integers. How can I get a list of the form [1] 1,2,3,4,5 into the form [1] 1 [2] 2 [3] 3 [4] 4 [5] 5...

...ng to install package Bhat on a Win machine, had a problem and figured out a fix, but would like to report the problem and make sure the fix is correct. This is what I do: 1. Download Bhat_0.9-07.tar.gz 2. Uncompress it and compress it back to Bhat_0.9-07.zip 3. Install from the R windows gui (that apparentely requires the zip compression and cannot deal with the tar.gz) But when I type library(Bhat) I get: Error in testRversion(descfirlds): This package has not been installed properly. See Note in ?library There it says that a "Built:" field should exist in DESCRIPTION. As it is not there...

....casalino93 at gmail.com> writes: > >>>>> - Should not impact compile time excessively (what is "excessive?") >>>> Probably, such estimation should be performed on >>> Did something get cut off here? >> Uops. Yep, I removed a paragraph, but, apparentely I forgot the first >> period. In any case, we should discuss about how to quantitatively >> determine an acceptable upper-bound on the overhead on the compilation >> time and give a motivation for it. For instance, max n% overhead on the >> compilation time must be guarantee...

...gt; writes: > > > >>>>> - Should not impact compile time excessively (what is "excessive?") > >>>> Probably, such estimation should be performed on > >>> Did something get cut off here? > >> Uops. Yep, I removed a paragraph, but, apparentely I forgot the first > >> period. In any case, we should discuss about how to quantitatively > >> determine an acceptable upper-bound on the overhead on the compilation > >> time and give a motivation for it. For instance, max n% overhead on the > >> compilation ti...

...e:/Rseg/test.def echo EXPORTS >> e:/Rseg/test.def nm e:/Rseg/test.a > Defs sed -n '/^........ [BCDRT] _/s/^........ [BCDRT] _/ /p' Defs >> e:/Rseg/test.def rm -f Defs gcc --shared -s -o e:/Rseg/test.dll e:/Rseg/test.def e:/Rseg/test.a -LE:/RW10 31/src/gnuwin32 -lg2c -lR Apparentely, all good. But, from R: > dyn.load("test.dll") > a <- segmentaF2001.new3(test5.stat,test5.ady) ITERACION: 1Error in .Call("printListElement", lista, t(stat), ncol(stat), nrow(stat)) : .Call function name not in load table Timing stopped at: NA NA 0.11 NA NA &...

Hello, it might be a very simple question but I cannot find the solution (I tried a || b, any(a,b)... but none works). My problem is: I have two vectors, a <- c(TRUE,FALSE,FALSE) b <- c(TRUE,FALSE,TRUE) and I would like to obtain a vector that indicates if it is TRUE in any of the two vectors. Hence, the desired output would be: TRUE, FALSE, TRUE Thank you in advance, Federico

Hello, Rather new to RoR, so I''m not sure about the terminology and such :-/ . My question is: how could I know the model which is associated to a controller? For example: - controller class is TestController, which is a subclass of ApplicationController - associated model class is Test How could I write some code in a method of ApplicationController to dermine the current

Hi Jack, Are you packaging all the static libraries that lld produces as part of the package ? PS : When I build on x86_64, I only get a 9M image for lld. Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 11/20/2013 9:15 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > When lld-3.4 is added to the tools directory of the llvm source tree > as lld, the resulting cmake build produces a huge number of static libs and > bloats

When lld-3.4 is added to the tools directory of the llvm source tree as lld, the resulting cmake build produces a huge number of static libs and bloats the overall package from... -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 86361440 Nov 19 21:09 llvm34_3.4-0_darwin-x86_64.deb to -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 495257452 Nov 19 20:49 llvm34_3.4-0_darwin-x86_64.deb Is this a known issue with the initial release of