search for: appallingly

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 62 matches for "appallingly".

2004 May 18
5
AArgh, * and the 7960
I've just had the most appalling performance from * ever. Dialling: Cisco 7960 => asterisk => IAX produces sound drop outs so extreme that the call is useless. I noted this in an earlier post. Dialling: Cisco ATA186 => asterisk => IAX is fine. Frankly, I think this is such a bad problem that it should be sorted in advance of any of the new features that seem to be
2008 Jun 12
2
Need a quick, safe method to empty /home/user/Maildir/{.Junk, .Trash}
I have some (Thunderbird client, dovecot-1.0.13, Maildir) users who get an appalling amount of spam-with-attachment, and it's causing backups to take an inordinate amount of time. I'll implement some quota and server-side spam management when I go to dovecot-1.1, but in the meantime: What is the safest way to empty all messages within, but not delete, the following folders from the
2017 Oct 04
3
how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?
On Wednesday 04 October 2017 13:39:30 Mark Haney wrote: > I'll end this by saying, I hope the production servers you have don't > provide critical services that could jeopardize the lives of people.? > I'd ask who you work for, to make sure I avoid them at all costs, but > I'm not sure I'd be told. The company I work for, and the livelihood of the hundreds of
2020 Aug 07
2
Rsync 3.2.3 released
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:46 PM Rupert Gallagher wrote: > I noted that rsync writes a gmon file on the source path and leaves it > there when it terminates. Nope, it doesn't. You'll need to figure out what's going on with your setup. Also, I have 12GB of cache in ecc ram that rsync is not using. > It uses whatever memory it needs plus whatever filesystem caching your OS
2020 Aug 08
2
Rsync 3.2.3 released
Rupert Gallagher via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 7 Aug 2020, 23:44, Wayne Davison < wayne at opencoder.net> wrote: > > >> Also, I have 12GB of cache in ecc ram that rsync is not using. > > >It uses whatever memory it needs plus whatever filesystem caching > >your OS provides. > > Hmmm... bad day today... > > No, it is not
2006 Nov 03
2
tasks need --rakelibdir
Hey, quick question: what am I missing that I always need to pass the ''--rakelibdir vendor/plugins/backgroundrb/tasks'' option to rake? thanks, James
2011 Feb 06
1
Drive id confusion
Solaris and/or ZFS are badly confused about drive IDs. The "c5t0d0" names are very far removed from the real world, and possibly they''ve gotten screwed up somehow. Is devfsadm supposed to fix those, or does it only delete excess? Reason I believe it''s confused: zpool status shows mirror-0 on c9t3d0, c9t2d0, and c9t5d0. But format shows the one remaining Seagate
2004 Apr 17
2
Network Magazine 04/04/04 Article pg 19 (Free IP Telephony PBXs?)
* Brethren, It's a sad day in our community. Please join me in a moment of silence for the death of responsible journalism. Silence.....................good enough. This article goes on to tell about Pingtel's announcement of forming the "first open source community aimed at creating SIP based servers".
2008 Jan 09
1
Newbie: confusion with the new FXO/FXS card
Hello everyone, I'm trying to set up a Asterisk server. I have two cards - one is an BeroNet BN2S0 with two ISDN lines (4 channels): http://www.adcomtec.com/webstore/beronet_bn2s0.php?cat=90 and a Rhino R8FXX with one FXO module and two FXS: http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=2940 I would like to set up an Asterisk server with 8 phones, which will share the phone
2007 Oct 18
1
Vista performance (uggh)
Issue: Vista reads slowly from a samba server. This appears to pop up periodically here and elsewhere. My samba.conf file has: [homes] ... vfs objects = readahead As suggested elsewhere. Writes are approximately 17-18MB/s which is acceptable. Reads are in the 8MB/s range which is appalingly slow. Using linux smbclient and windows XP clients I can read at 25+MB/s. I've enabled vfs
2012 Mar 22
1
R-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 22
>>> strongly disagree. I'm appalled to see that sentence here. >> > >> > Come on! >> > >>> >> The overhead is significant for any large vector and it is in particular unnecessary since in .C you have to allocate*and copy* space even for results (twice!). Also it is very error-prone, because you have no information about the length of
2010 Jul 09
10
Torchlight Performance
Hey all, finally got rid of windows, though we'll see how long that lasts... I really do enjoy my video games and am not looking forward to not having any of them work (can't seem to get any that I expected to work). Anyway... Wine: wine-1.2-rc6-44-gcd72aef Program: Torchlight v1.15 Computer: AMD Athlon X2 2.2Ghz 3GB DDR2 RAM Nvidia GeForce 9600M Fedora 13 Linux Kernel
2005 Oct 06
14
www.openpbx.org
Hello, What do you think of this project www.openpbx.org ? Something like ser and openser ! Kinds Regards Harry ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger T?l?chargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
2009 Jan 27
20
Xen SAN Questions
Hello Everyone, I recently had a question that got no responses about GFS+DRBD clusters for Xen VM storage, but after some consideration (and a lot of Googling) I have a couple of new questions. Basically what we have here are two servers that will each have a RAID-5 array filled up with 5 x 320GB SATA drives, I want to have these as useable file systems on both servers (as they will both be
2020 Jan 31
2
[cfe-dev] Phabricator -> GitHub PRs?
...update the contributing instructions to > > reflect reality. > > > > John > > I expect 99+% of the messages on cfe-commits are automatically generated, > but that doesn't mean nobody reads the list. I'm not the only one who > finds the Phabricator UI to be appallingly bad or even impenetrable, for > anything more sophisticated than posting comments. (I also have a recipe > for posting new patches, learned through trial and many errors.) > I certainly don't use the web UI for figuring out which patches to read > and/or comment on; I use the maili...
2010 Sep 10
11
Large directory performance
We have been struggling with our Lustre performance for some time now especially with large directories. I recently did some informal benchmarking (on a live system so I know results are not scientifically valid) and noticed a huge drop in performance of reads(stat operations) past 20k files in a single directory. I''m using bonnie++, disabling IO testing (-s 0) and just creating, reading,
2015 Feb 02
0
Another Fedora decision
...not going to be any back-off by the developers. Why would there be? The trend in security is clear: keep up or get run over. The only question is how quickly forward we proceed, not which direction ?forward? is. RHEL has been moving forward pretty darn slowly. The current system in EL7 allows *appallingly* bad passwords. Passwords that can be cracked in reasonable time scales even with SSH?s existing rate-limiting. > 4. There is absolutely no rational argument that can be made to anyone > alter any of this. That could be because there is no rational reason. Got one? Lay it on me. Please...
2017 Oct 04
0
how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?
On 10/04/2017 08:46 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 13:39:30 Mark Haney wrote: >> I'll end this by saying, I hope the production servers you have don't >> provide critical services that could jeopardize the lives of people. >> I'd ask who you work for, to make sure I avoid them at all costs, but >> I'm not sure I'd be told.
2020 Aug 09
0
Rsync 3.2.3 released
Beach ball play is fun, but I see this ball bounched betwen rsync, openbsd and supermicro, and I am not enjoying it. I see a large cache delivered by the OS on server hardware and a program unable to use it. -------- Original Message -------- On 8 Aug 2020, 20:14, < pluto at agora.rdrop.com> wrote: Rupert Gallagher via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 7 Aug 2020, 23:44,
2012 Mar 16
1
rJava call performance
Hello, I am getting pretty poor rJava call performance > system.time(for (i in 1:1000) J("java.lang.Double")$parseDouble(as.character(i))) user system elapsed 4.884 0.000 4.900 i.e. 5 milliseconds per very simple call on a very fast cpu. JNI calls themselves are said to be pretty fast nowadays (10...40ns). It probably goes accross reflection but still doing pretty much