search for: apelant

Hi Martin, > thanks for the quick reply. I understand, that the generated code is different > between the two approaches. > But I would still expect IEEE rules to be respected in any case. I do not see > any reason why -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer > and the like should have any impact on the results computed by the generated code. probably in the direct case you are using the x86

Hi Duncan, thanks for the quick reply. I understand, that the generated code is different between the two approaches. But I would still expect IEEE rules to be respected in any case. I do not see any reason why -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer and the like should have any impact on the results computed by the generated code. Are there any options I can set on the command line of llc to force the

On Jun 5, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Martin Apel <martin.apel at SIMPACK.de> wrote: > I am trying to implement loop unrolling in a context, where lots of constant propagation has taken place. > Unrolling an outer loop might make an inner loop have constant bounds, therefore I want to process the loops > outside in, i.e. from parent loops to nested loops. > Unfortunately the standard loop

I am trying to implement loop unrolling in a context, where lots of constant propagation has taken place. Unrolling an outer loop might make an inner loop have constant bounds, therefore I want to process the loops outside in, i.e. from parent loops to nested loops. Unfortunately the standard loop pass manager performs loop passes inside out, i.e. from nested loops to parent loops, thereby missing

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Martin Apel <martin.apel at simpack.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I stumbled across a peculiarity regarding constant propagation that I don't understand. I'm not sure, if I oversee anything or if it's a missing feature. > > I have created the following simple test function in C: > > int times_zero(int a) > { >  return (a *

Hello... I have a big problem with asterisk. Every time i make a call asterisk does not bridge the zap channels. The zap channel from which i'm calling remains in state:ring and applicaton:dial and the zap channel with the external line configured remains in state:dialling an Application:AppDial. Zap/20-1 agentie s 1 Dialing AppDial (Outgoing Line) 09399 (None) Zap/9-1 int_omg 09399 5 Ring

Hi all, I stumbled across a peculiarity regarding constant propagation that I don't understand. I'm not sure, if I oversee anything or if it's a missing feature. I have created the following simple test function in C: int times_zero(int a) { return (a * 0); } Compiling this with GCC using dragonegg generates the following code: %int = type i32 define i32 @times_zero(i32 %a)

...r comment that might be helpful. thanx in Advance pleaes reply here or to me mughrabi@hotmail.com Thanx in Advance Ali Mughrabi -- Accepting call from '065639815' to '9009170' on channel 20, span 3 -- Executing AGI("Zap/82-1", "../album_show/album_show.agi|--apelant=065639815") in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/../album_show/album_show.agi -- B-channel 14 successfully restarted on span 3 -- B-channel 15 successfully restarted on span 3 == Spawn extension (inbound, 9009170, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/82-1'...

Martin Apel wrote: > static LLVMContext context; That's your bug. Here's the situation that contexts help with. Suppose you write a library that uses LLVM under the hood (graphics, let's say), and I write another one that uses LLVM and does audio processing. Someone then decides to write a video game that uses both of our libraries. As long as we each use a separate context,

Hello everybody, I have written a shell script that makes the building of a Solaris package of rsync easier. Because I think it is useful for other Solaris user, I wold be very happy, if somebody would include it to the source tree. There is one little things to do: - include it in the auto-configuration process, so that the version number will be set correctly. So far, Jens ----- Script

Hi Martin, > I tried using dragonegg to compile some numerical software of ours. I > tried out two different approaches expecting both would yield the same > results: > 1. gfortran-4.6 -fplugin=dragonegg-3.0 -o test.o test.f (I ommitted a > bunch of additional arguments for brevity) > 2. gfortran-4.6 -fplugin=dragonegg-3.0 -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir -S > -o test.ll

Hi all, I tried using dragonegg to compile some numerical software of ours. I tried out two different approaches expecting both would yield the same results: 1. gfortran-4.6 -fplugin=dragonegg-3.0 -o test.o test.f (I ommitted a bunch of additional arguments for brevity) 2. gfortran-4.6 -fplugin=dragonegg-3.0 -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir -S -o test.ll test.f llc -O0 -o test.s test.ll as

Hi all, I'm rather new to LLVM and intend to dive into partial evaluation with LLVM. I tried to run the example from http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08-23/llvm_partial.pdf, which worked after some adaptations, which were necessary, because LLVM evolved since the slides were made. However, I also tried to get the same example running as an optimization pass following the instructions in

Hi all, I need to look at the CFG of a loop during debugging. However the containing function is very large, so it is rather difficult to use the CFG of the complete function. I tried using the ViewGraph method, but the compiler kept complaining about undefined symbols related to GraphTraits or DOTGraphTraits. Is there any example that I could look at to find out, what exactly I need to call

Dragi compatrioti, Numele meu este Constantin Timoc. Candidez la postul de presedinte al Romaniei pentru a asigura tuturor cetatenilor locuri de munca cat mai bine platite, pentru a distruge coruptia care paralizeaza intreaga societate si pentru a accelera aderarea tarii noastre la Uniunea Europeana. Fac apel catre toti cetatenii sa aleaga presedinte al Romaniei un candidat care e cinstit,

I would like to hear from some one who has ecb, multiple modes with ruby mode + html mode, rails mode all working together and playing well. I had ecb working with Ruby syntax highlighting. That was a no-brainer since I just had to apt-get them on my Debian Sarge box. It got a bit more comlex after I got most of the .el files in the articles http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs/RubyOnRails

Duncan - (but sent to R-devel, for any other thoughts?) How do you envision RSPerl being used? Without having seen the details, I can think of playing with strings; is there a preferred incantation for stringification of R objects (serialization)? (actually, the main problem I'm having is that I know how I want to code something like: Robject <-

Has anyone succeeded in compiling R-1.1.0 on a Digital (Compaq) Alpha running OSF4.0F (or E)? Everything seems to compile OK (except the frequent "Warning: Unresolved:" at link time - this threw me off the scent for a while!), but then at run time I get: Fatal error: The X11 shared library could not be loaded. The error was dlopen: cannot load

Error: mount.ocfs2: Transport endpoint is not connected while mounting /dev/sdc1 on /u02, could not mount /dev/sdc1. The installation step is: 1. install all rpms on int-rac1, int-rac2 2. interconnect int-rac1, int-rac2, ping each other using private ip and public ip ok. Add EMC SAN as shared disk and visable for two nodes. 3. configure int-rac1 using ocfs2console, add two nodes 4. according

Hi Anton, yes the first command line contained -O0 as well. I also tried omitting -O0 from the llc command line, but this made no difference. Martin On 17/04/12 17:14, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Martin, > >> Are there any options I can set on the command line of llc to force the >> identical behaviour with respect to numerical stability? >> I tried the some of the llc