search for: aoyoume

aoTuV Beta5 (based on aoTuV Release 1) http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ Changes: aoTuV Beta5 2006/10/24 * The action of noise normalization has been improved. This has an effect in the sound roughness and tremor problem etc. in the low bitrate. * The threshold of a stereo mode change was calculated dynamically. Some of problems which originate in channel coup...

... and was wondering how it differs from the official libvorbis and why there is need for a fork. Could somebody shed some light on the past and background of the libvorbis/aoTuV story please? Both on- and offlist mails are welcome. Thanks in advance, Sebastian

Hi All, Are multi-channel (more than 2) formats fully supported in the OggVorbis specification ? I couldn't find any information about multi-channel support on xiph.org. I've used 'oggdropXPd' to encode a 5.1 wavefile and the Xiph OggVorbis libraries (vorbisfile.dll) to decode the file successfully, however the order of the channel interleaving is different to the original wave

Hi: I am a new user of icecast, and I was wondering, wich source software, gives the option of compressing to low bitrates an ogg stream (lower than 48 kbps). Thanks: CC

aoTuV pre-beta4 [20050412] http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/test.html

aoTuV beta4 is based on libVorbis1.1.1 now!! http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/

How can i install libvorbis on Windows xp? _________________________________________________________________ Consigue el nuevo Windows Live Messenger http://get.live.com/messenger/overview

Hi again, I was just looking at reviews on vorbis and reading some listening test results when I came across several web sites that were saying something about Vorbis quality -2. From what I read a few programs have Vorbis going down to quality -2 and I even think hydrogen audio forums mentions it in a speech compression topic. Does this quality really exist and has anyone even heard of it? I

...the Impulse block was expanded. This is effective with the outstanding sample of the pre-echo. # The pre-echo reduction code came to work at a lower bit rate. # Noise Normalization was reviewed. As a result, the bug is revised. # The detailed tuning was done again. http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ Aoyumi

...is problem does not influence the encode function. # Reduced distortion by clipping at low sampling frequency and/or low bitrate. # Fixed noise control part of impulse block added in the beta5.5. # Tuning of each part was redone according to above-mentioned changed part. http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ Aoyumi

I released "aoTuV" beta6 of OggVorbis encoder, library. ---------------------------------------- CHANGES (for general) from beta5.7 # Libvorbis aoTuV was unified with Xiph.Org's libvorbis1.3.2. # Pre(post)-echo of the specific pattern was improved. # The bit allotment when sound of the different type coexisted was improved. # The calculation method of dynamic thresholds

...ffer the album in ogg vorbis format for us free software (as in freedom) / open-source users? useful links follow http://www.vorbis.com/faq/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogg_vorbis http://www.xiph.org the current state of the art vorbis encoder is in the following link http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ kind regards,

I released "aoTuV" beta6.03 (2014) of OggVorbis encoder and library (based on libVorbis). Source code and reference binary (win32) is here. http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANGES (for general) from old beta6.03 # The latest aoTuV beta6.03 was unified with Xiph.Org's libvorbis1.3.4. The part related to sound quality is not changed from previous version. ------------------------...

Sorry for asking, but libogg and libvorbis especially are still developed? No updates from september 2004. I just need to know if I have to move to FLAC [which is actively maintained] to store my CDs.

Sorry for the crosspost but it's relevant to Vorbis and Icecast I believe. I'm seeing more and more streaming stations using AACplus, with many listeners being amazed at the sound quality. Most say that a 48kb/s sounds better than a 128kb/s MP3, which would put Ogg Vorbis at around 96kb/s IMO. That means only half the bitrate is required in AACplus compared to Ogg Vorbis for the same

Sorry for the crosspost but it's relevant to Vorbis and Icecast I believe. I'm seeing more and more streaming stations using AACplus, with many listeners being amazed at the sound quality. Most say that a 48kb/s sounds better than a 128kb/s MP3, which would put Ogg Vorbis at around 96kb/s IMO. That means only half the bitrate is required in AACplus compared to Ogg Vorbis for the same

Soon, Firefox 3.1 and other browsers will start to support vorbis and users will increase vorbis use on the net. Most users (as most Linux distributions) are however using the reference xiph.org vorbis library which generate worse files than the aoTuV library from http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ . According to latest discussion: https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1251 the aoTuV code should have been reviewed before merging it in the reference xiph.org library. So, is there some news on this? It would be nice to have that merged before the masses start putting vorbis file on the net for t...

I compared quicktime aac and vorbis,i think quicktime aac is better than vorbis at 80Kbps. please tell me if i'm wrong. using command: qtaacenc.exe --tvbr 31 --highest --samplerate keep test.wav qt.m4a oggenc2.exe --raw -q 1.6 test.wav -o vorbis.ogg the version: qtaacenc version 20100725 with QuickTime 7.6.7 OggEnc v2.87 (libvorbis 1.3.1) links: