search for: anythi

Am 27.09.18 um 10:04 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:46:40 +0200 > Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: > > >> Hello  Andrew and Rowland, >> >> here's the ldbsearch output from both domain controllers: >> >> >> dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb >> '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID

I had a small peak at your patch. This also applies to samba 4.8.5? Now, basicly, i dont know anythis what that patch is doing, im not a coder, i can read it a bit. But if did read it correct, its about rID pool alloctions where rID = 0 ? Like this: (dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC2,OU=Domain Controllers,) rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 rIDPreviousAllocationPool: 0-0 rIDUsedPool: 0 rIDNextRID: 0 And on DC1...

...ing. i have to log out of game and come back in then have 6 hours till it happens again.exactly 6 hours almost to the second. i have a friend who has the same problem. it's only a minor problem i can live with but was wondering if anybody else has this issue and has a fix for it? can't find anythiing in the logs that seems relevant.

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:33:01 -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > >> 3 netdev model breaks this configuration starting with the creation > >> and naming of the 2 devices to udev needing to be aware of master and > >> slave virtio-net devices. > > I don't understand this comment. There is one virtio-net device and > > one "virtio-bond" netdev.

Where can I learn the syntax for DBput and DBget? is it working with MySQL? do I need to set up tables? URiel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030508/a2598dc8/attachment.htm

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici at wp.pl> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:33:01 -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: >> >> 3 netdev model breaks this configuration starting with the creation >> >> and naming of the 2 devices to udev needing to be aware of master and >> >> slave virtio-net devices. >> > I don't

On 1/28/2018 9:35 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici at wp.pl> wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:33:01 -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: >>>>> 3 netdev model breaks this configuration starting with the creation >>>>> and naming of the 2 devices to udev needing to be aware of master and

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Samudrala, Sridhar <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > On 1/28/2018 9:35 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici at wp.pl> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:33:01 -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 3 netdev model

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8