search for: anthonly

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks > using ptrace. > > There is a mitigation described here > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344#c13 > > which doesn't fix the

Check out these MSKB articles. They describe how shortcuts are resolved. In particular, the last one describes the process required to "fix" this behaviour. I had a LOT of trouble when I first set up my LAN because people had a nasty habit of sharing drive C (even I used to do this until I discovered that this is a Bad Idea). The main problem is that the shortcut includes the UNC

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 >> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: >> >>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >>> officially patched? As far

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > attacks using ptrace. I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel (local build) using a rhel6 adaptation of the upstream fix. Ask

On 10/26/2016 05:56 AM, Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:21:54 -0700 > Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster >> <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: >>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi user

I am currently investigating using samba on a Linux box to provide file server services on our NT LAN (I'm a bit sick of NT doing dummy spits on me). I'm running RH5.1, and have just upgraded samba to samba-1.9.18p8-51.3 (using the rpm from http://samba.anu.edu.au/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/redhat/RPMS/5.1/samba- 1.9.18p8-51.3.i386.rpm) The setup includes several NT servers, one set up as

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:29:33 -0400 "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> > wrote: > > > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > > attacks using ptrace. > >

Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 > Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > >> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to >> attacks using ptrace. > > I can confirm that c6 is

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:21:54 -0700 Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster > <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: > >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 > >> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > >>

Dear Samba Team, There are three issues happening in my Samba 3.6.6 Issue 1: After upgrade, when upload file which is more 100mb to Samba, it shows error "File name too long cannot copy" in windows xp. Tried to use 3 different pc to upload different files more than 100mb, it also fail to transfer the file and show the error. Tested to upload file which is 25mb or 50mb, it is okay, no

I am trying to automate the install of the ati driver package. Basically all I do is hit return about 6 times and take all the defaults. I tried to do this in a file that I then made executable with 744: sh ati-driver-installer-10-8-x86.x86_64.run << EOF EOF but then it starts like its doing something but never does anything. How might I automate such an install script. Again

Hi, what is the right way to deal with the new cr repository for centos 5 when you are running your own mirror. In particular the following statement I don't fully understand: - Once 5.7 is released, the 5.6/cr/ repositories will be removed ( they will not be available on vault.centos.org ) Christian.

The redhat errata link leads to a 404 page. Anybody know what this is about? Cheers, Christian. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:3200 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:38:19 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Reply-To: centos at centos.org To: centos-announce at centos.org CentOS Errata and

remove

Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources are behaving fine. Instead I'm just seing Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01 postfix/smtpd[107746]: Anonymous TLS connection established from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.25.159]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits) Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01

Fixed, we had smtp_security_level=verify, which I forgot to remove when we removed the relay server we used. Now it should work. Aki On 28.3.2019 13.59, Christian Anthon via dovecot wrote: > Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving > mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources > are behaving fine. > > Instead I'm just

What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks using ptrace. There is a mitigation described here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344#c13 which doesn't fix the underlying problem, but at least protects against known attack vectors. However, I'm unsure if the script only

Hi, I wanted to update the bind package on our centos-6 servers, and the package is there for the mirrors I've checked, but the repodata dates back from January 18. May be I'm too fast and the repodata update comes later. If so how long can it take? Cheers, Christian.

After upgrading to openssh-2.5.2p2, my users were unable to login using ssh Protocol 1. Entries like this were showing up in syslog: Apr 5 19:29:45 maple sshd[16726]: Accepted password for anthonyu from ::ffff:192.168.0.2 port 1019 Apr 5 19:29:45 maple sshd[16726]: fatal: stat(/dev/pts/1 19:29:45 sshd[16726]: Accepted password for anthonyu) failed: No such file or directory Apr 5 19:29:45