search for: anthon

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks > using ptrace. > > There is a mitigation described here > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi...

...proposed in the last article work (although they seem to be more complete than the 95 fixes) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q128/9/32.asp http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q150/2/15.asp http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q158/6/82.asp Cheers Michael Anthon TAMS Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Perrin - Demography [mailto:aperrin@demog.Berkeley.EDU] > Sent: Wednesday, 29 July 1998 1:41 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: Re: Strange problem with icons! > > > I've got similar behavior here --...

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 >> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: >> >>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >>> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to >>> attacks using ptrace. >> >> I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're...

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > attacks using ptrace. I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel (local build) using a...

...com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster >> <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: >>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 >>>> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >>>>> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to >>>>> attacks using ptrace. >>>> >>>...

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi user

...doing this and smbd seems to start off using around 8% of CPU time, but at the point things seem to start slowing down, the usage jumps up to 75-80%. I'm wondering if this is a known problem and if it's not, perhaps a few pointers on where to start looking might help me a bit. TIA Michael Anthon TAMS Systems PS. I have done a bit more checking. It seems that when I start to copy a large file, smbd starts using about 5% CPU time. This slowly increases to a point where it is using about 80% or so. At the same time, the system seems to start thrashing the hard drive. I did look in to...

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:29:33 -0400 "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> > wrote: > > > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > > attacks using ptrace. > > > > There is a mitigation described here > > >...

Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 > Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > >> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to >> attacks using ptrace. > > I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched ke...

...i <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster > <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: > >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 > >> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > >> > >>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > >>> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > >>> attacks using ptrace. > >> > >> I can confirm...

...3.6, I am using samba 3.0.28. Issue 2: Users could logon to the pc within the domain, but the network drive could not be mapped from 15-7-16 after 18:00 around (e.g. \\dc01\netlogon). And the network drive could not be mapped through net use command in windows xp. Also, the trust relationship with anthoner domain chb lost. Attached the samba log and error screen capture for reference Issue 3. When enter the command "service smb status", it show many process id, is it normal? Thanks for your help. There my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = HB server string = DC01 netbios name = DC01 inter...

I am trying to automate the install of the ati driver package. Basically all I do is hit return about 6 times and take all the defaults. I tried to do this in a file that I then made executable with 744: sh ati-driver-installer-10-8-x86.x86_64.run << EOF EOF but then it starts like its doing something but never does anything. How might I automate such an install script. Again

Hi, what is the right way to deal with the new cr repository for centos 5 when you are running your own mirror. In particular the following statement I don't fully understand: - Once 5.7 is released, the 5.6/cr/ repositories will be removed ( they will not be available on vault.centos.org ) Christian.

The redhat errata link leads to a 404 page. Anybody know what this is about? Cheers, Christian. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:3200 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:38:19 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Reply-To: centos at centos.org To: centos-announce at centos.org CentOS Errata and

remove

...na01 postfix/smtpd[66648]: free milter inet:localhost:11332 Mar 28 10:57:55 dna01 postfix/smtpd[66648]: master_notify: status 1 Mar 28 10:57:55 dna01 postfix/smtpd[66648]: connection closed Mar 28 10:58:00 dna01 postfix/smtpd[66648]: auto_clnt_close: disconnect private/tlsmgr stream -- Christian Anthon

Fixed, we had smtp_security_level=verify, which I forgot to remove when we removed the relay server we used. Now it should work. Aki On 28.3.2019 13.59, Christian Anthon via dovecot wrote: > Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving > mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources > are behaving fine. > > Instead I'm just seing > > Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01 postfix/smtpd[107746]: Anonymous TLS...

What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks using ptrace. There is a mitigation described here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344#c13 which doesn't fix the underlying problem, but at least protects against known attack vectors. However, I'm unsure if the script only

Hi, I wanted to update the bind package on our centos-6 servers, and the package is there for the mirrors I've checked, but the repodata dates back from January 18. May be I'm too fast and the repodata update comes later. If so how long can it take? Cheers, Christian.

After upgrading to openssh-2.5.2p2, my users were unable to login using ssh Protocol 1. Entries like this were showing up in syslog: Apr 5 19:29:45 maple sshd[16726]: Accepted password for anthonyu from ::ffff:192.168.0.2 port 1019 Apr 5 19:29:45 maple sshd[16726]: fatal: stat(/dev/pts/1 19:29:45 sshd[16726]: Accepted password for anthonyu) failed: No such file or directory Apr 5 19:29:45 maple sshd[16726]: error: chown /dev/pts/1 19:29:45 sshd[16726]: Accepted password for anthonyu 0 0 f...