search for: analogg

I have a rails application that runs on multiple mongrels and I would like to make the log files non-interlacing. Are there any logging modifications/other loggers out there that I could use to create process safe logging? Thank you, Matt Margolis

Hello, I have been looking at the Ruby/EventMachine. First let me say it look very good. Reactor model with no threads makes for fast reliable server, and I have read about marvelous Twisted framework for Python and am glad to see something similar for Ruby. I am writing network app with Ruby threads now and it very slow, and I try new Ruby 1.9 with native threads that make it much slower.

Sorry this is going to be a bit vague, but I''ve noticed something rather odd going on with EventMachine on Linux. I''ve written something uses EventMachine to proxy HTTP to other processes. On OS X, it works great, adding only about 20% extra latency into the connection when proxying versus connecting to the original backend process directly, so a 5ms connection might now take

I heard about a new mongrel plugin or version that''s single threaded and uses non-blocking IO with events. It''s called something like "swifty fly". Anyone have a link for it? Thanks.

Hey, I''m working on a project, and mongrel may be part of the stack, but I''ve got some more general questions and ideas I''m hoping to run by this list. The people on this list have a broader knowledgebase and more experience than any place else I know - plus a general friendliness and willingness to help! I''m working with a company who has a really antique

Hello, I''m running mongrel behind apache via proxypass. Every now and then, a spammer tries to proxy traffic through apache, and for some reason, apache forwards the request to mongrel, even though it''s not a site being hosted by me. At times this seems to cause mongrel to become unresponsive, and all requests to the site then fail with a proxy error until mongrel is

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Sorry, for the re-post, but I''m new to the mailing list and wanted to bring back up and old topic I saw in the archives. http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2008-February/004991.html I think a patch to delay garbage collection and run it later is pretty important for high performance web applications. I do understand the trade-offs of having explicit vs. implicit garbage