search for: amethod

Hi, I have this setup block: setup do session[:login] = ''jhughes'' @user = mock("user") User.stub!(:find).and_return(@user) @params = {:cn => "Bilbo Baggins", :telephoneNumber => "416-277-4418", :mail => "bilbo at baggins.com"} end And then this spec: specify "should update and save the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The lmer() function in the lme4 package has some code of the form mc <- match.call() mc[[1]] <- as.name("lFormula") lmod <- eval(mc, parent.frame(1L)) this is a fairly common idiom in R, found e.g. in lm(), used when one wants to pass all of the arguments of a function to a different function (in the case of lm() it's

i tried a method to implementa file uploader by using amethod below this is ma controlller method to upload def save_imports Contactslist.save(params[:list]) render :text => "File uploaded successfully" this is ma view file .remote - form_for(@list, :url=> save_imports_list_path(@list, :format => "js"), :htm...

...paces) > trimwhitespace(paste(x, "abc")) [1] "abc\0\0\002\0\002\0\001\0\001\004\0\0\0\a\003\0\0\004\002\0\0\0\001\0\0\024 \0\0\0\005class\0\0\006\020\0\0\0\001\0\0\004 \0\0\0\024groupGenericFunction\0\0\004\002\0\0\0\001\0\0\024 \0\0\0\apackage\0\0\004\020\0\0\0\001\0\0\004 \0\0\0\amethods\0\0\0?\0\0\004\002\0\0\0\001\0\0\024 \0\0\0\fgroupMembers\0\0\004\023\0\0\0\a\0\0\004\020\0\0\0\001\0\0\004 \0\0\0\001+\0\0\004\020\0\0\0\001\0\0\004 \0\0\0\001-\0\0\004\020\0\0\0\001\0\0\004 \0\0\0\001*\0\0\004\020\0\0\0\001\0\0\004 \0\0\0\001^\0\0\004\020\0\0\0\001\0\0\004 \0\0\0\002%%\0\0\004\0...

...ad your form) whereas error_message_on must be use with an instanciated object ... So, you always has to double check if anObject is not nil before using error_message_on ? I don''t understand why there is a difference, I mean why you cannot simply use <% error_message_on anObject, aMethod %> without evaluating anObject ? thanks arnaud

Hi all, previously I submitted this thread through Nabble which seems fail therefore sending it again.... suppose I have written following function :  > fn = function(x) return(x+x^2)  > fn  function(x) return(x+x^2)  Here you see, if I type only the function name all inside information of this function are visible. Is there any way to protect them i.e. make them invisible?  Thanks

...and-scope-chain.as @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +// makeswf -v 7 -s 200x150 -r 1 -o scope-chain-with-and-scope-chain.swf scope-chain-with-and-scope-chain.as +// taken with permission from http://www.timotheegroleau.com/Flash/articles/scope_chain.htm + +o1 = {a:5}; +o2 = {}; +with (o1) { + trace(a); // 5 + o2.aMethod = function() { + trace(a); + }; +}; +o2.aMethod(); // undefined + +loadMovie ("FSCommand:quit", ""); diff-tree 87e4fa70d0d8cb93ec124fe97e5781794a8a2d7e (from ef4b8c89c3e50cdd36402301e9aad38270accf24) Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Thu Sep 13 20:42:54...