search for: ambiquities

I''m getting this very weird error and I can''t figure out what the problem is. I''m using acts_as_commentable. Basically, I have a partial with this code in it: <div id="<%= ''#{comment.commentable_type}_comment_# {comment.commentable_id}'' %>" class="comment"> <dl> <dt><%= link_to comment.user.login,

>> >Could we please have a clarification on the semantics of >> >PAM_CRED_ESTABLISH vs. the semantics of PAM_REINITIALIZE_CREDS? >> >> My interpretation is: >> >> You call PAM_ESTABLISH_CRED to create them >> You call PAM_REINITIALIZE_CRED to update creds that can expire over time, >> for example a kerberos ticket. Oops. I meant

Hi All, I have read the links from Joel. It seems one of its main focus is vectorization of loop with vector predicate register. I am not sure we need the scalable vector type for it. Let's see a simple example from the white paper. 1 void example01(int *restrict a, const int *b, const int *c, long N) 2 { 3 long i; 4 for (i = 0; i < N; ++i) 5 a[i] = b[i] + c[i]; 6 }

Hi Graham, Thanks for your kind explanation. There was internal discussion about it. If possible, can you let me know the Clang/LLVM CodeGen patches for the vector type on phabricator please? I would like to check what kinds of the restrictions the type causes on Clang/LLVM. Thanks, JinGu Kang ________________________________ From: Graham Hunter <Graham.Hunter at arm.com> Sent: 28 May

JinGu: I’m not Graham, but you might find the following link a good starting point. https://community.arm.com/developer/tools-software/hpc/b/hpc-blog/posts/technology-update-the-scalable-vector-extension-sve-for-the-armv8-a-architecture The question you ask doesn’t have a short answer. The compiler and the instruction set design work together to allow programs to be compiled without knowing