search for: altix

What is the current state of Xen ia64 on SGI Altix? I see some Altix patches from sgi.com, I assume this means it is tested. Is it stable? Are there more appropriate mailing lists or documentation to query? Thankyou, Tim _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensou...

Hi All, I have been able to successfully CentOS 4.5 on a SGI Altix 450 with 8P and 12GB of RAM. When at the EFI prompt I had to boot with the following parameters elilo linux text console=ttySG0,38400n8 The installation is still going so I'll let you know if it boots after install

...t x86 (32 & 64) and IA64 it would be nice to do this all at once. I know that CentOS 4.5 supports all the platforms listed, but if it's going to come out soon I'll just wait as it offers my users a lot more in terms of packages and support. BTW: Anyone out there have CentOS on SGI Altix? -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 604-291-3610 Fax : 604-291-3045 Mobile : 778-840-6434 E-Mail : jpeltier at cs.sfu.ca Website : http://gruvi.cs.sfu.ca | http://scirf.cs.sfu.ca MSN : subatomic_spam at hotmail...

I have a SGI Altix 350 (ia64) that came with RHAS 4, but without any paid support. I would like to migrate the server over to CentOS. Here is what I've pieced together from some older posts by Johnny, can someone confirm this should work? I know this is somewhat covered in the FAQ, although both entrie...

On 5/19/2015 10:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 19 May 2015 11:40, <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: >> >> >> Or if you want a bigger hammer: >> >> systemctl disable NetworkManager.service >> systemctl enable network.service >> systemctl stop NetworkManager.service >> systemctl start network.service >> >> The above will disable

...t continues for the ~40 seconds until 3ds max becomes responsive again. We are running 3ds max 6.0 SP1 on Win2k and running the script by choosing 'Run Script...' from the MAXScript pulldown menu. Samba version: 3.0.5 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = theorphanage netbios name = altix server string = Altix log level = 1 max disk size = 512000 max xmit = 65535 oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no kernel oplocks = no strict locking = no guest account = orphan log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = share getwd c...

...ally speak for anyone else, but for me, a lot depends on the use > of the systems. I typically treat RHEL and CentOS the same way as far as > updating to the latest point release. It's never bit me in the past that I > am aware of. > > The only exception to that is with the SGI Altix 4300/4400s I used to > manage. We migrated from SLES to RHEL and in those cases, barring a serious > enough bug, those boxes were left alone until time came to refresh them, > such as the move from RHEL5 to RHEL6. > > Note that RHEL is a special case as there's some situations...

..., m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > And that one drives me nuts. It breaks PXE boot kickstart builds. Maybe > *you* have all same model systems from the same manufacturer; we've got > boxen from...<thinking> at least five or six manufacturers, of varying > ages, from the 10+ yr old Altix 3000 from SGI, to the current one from > SGI, to my 5 yr old Dell workstation, to some old Penguins and several > Suns (soon to set, the sooner the better...). How do you deal with > everything from em1 to ens3f0, which comes up *only* after you start to > install.... In what conceivabl...

Unfortunately, I've ran into a second issue where addpd is being performed on memory that isn't 16 byte aligned. Again, this only happens if the createJIT OptLevel is set to Default (vs None). According to http://www.jaist.ac.jp/iscenter-new/mpc/altix/altixdata/opt/intel/vtune/doc/users_guide/mergedProjects/analyzer_ec/mergedProjects/reference_olh/mergedProjects/instructions/instruct32_hh/vc8a.htm that will cause a GPF. I've attached the LLVM IR and a copy of the Disassembly this results in. The crash occurs at 00370872 At the time of the...

.../usr/bin/ld: open.o: @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol f__buflen /usr/bin/ld: open.o: @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol f__buflen collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I just run the "configure" and then "make". The system information is as follows: Hardware: SGI Altix 3700 Supercluster 28 1.3G Itanium dual processors (ia64) OS: Redhat Linux AS2.1 (ia64) I re-run the compling process on my own PC (AMD XP 2000+ with redhat linux 9) and got no problem at all ... almost hang my neck on that as I need to move all my work to that supercluster Thanks, Tao Chen

I am trying to install R onto an Altix system running SuSE Enterprise Linux 9 SP3 with SGI ProPack 4 SP3. I end up with this error no matter what I try. Any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated! ----- gcc -shared -L/opt/local/lib -o methods.so do_substitute_direct.o init.o methods_list_dispatch.o slot.o class_support.o...

...missing in our understanding of the interaction between R and C via SEXP objects, memory allocation, persistency, and any potential garbage collection that may be occurring. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Our environment is as follows, though we have seen the same behaviour on an SGI Altix system, a Mac OS X (Intel) system, and with R 2.3.0: platform powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0 arch powerpc os darwin8.8.0 system powerpc, darwin8.8.0 status major 2 minor 4.1 year 2006 month 12 day 18 svn rev 4022...

...a lot depends on the use >>> of the systems. I typically treat RHEL and CentOS the same way as far as >>> updating to the latest point release. It's never bit me in the past that I >>> am aware of. >>> >>> The only exception to that is with the SGI Altix 4300/4400s I used to >>> manage. We migrated from SLES to RHEL and in those cases, barring a serious >>> enough bug, those boxes were left alone until time came to refresh them, >>> such as the move from RHEL5 to RHEL6. >>> >>> >> >> >&gt...

Hi there. I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to repurpose with CentOS. The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade Manual http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are hard to find and hella expensive if you find em (and of reduced capacity). Any of you know: 1. If there's any

...ub-version numbers is wrong; and ... That is a matter of opinion. In my opinion, assigning sub-version numbers to what was originally intended to be, by Red Hat, quarterly updates (almost Service Packs, if you will, much like SGI's numbering of their Foundation and ProPack products for the Altix server line) is what is illogical. Of course, the updates aren't quarterly any more, and other aspects of the versioning have morphed and changed over the years since the RHAS days (well, even back in certain branches of RHL 6.2, for that matter). So you could read '7.1' as 'v...

...consumer area. > > We are dinosaurs. People do not hate us. They just do not understand > why we are still around. > ... > Sometimes I just cannot bear to think about this stuff anymore. > Hey, James, go get a cookie, a cup of hot tea, and relax a spell....maybe fire up the old Altix box for a space heater and get nice and toasty warm or something.... Sysadmins are still around; the areas in which sysadmins are needed and the skills sysadmins need to have are just changing, that's all. TV repairmen still exist; their skillset just is very different today than what it...

...there is no reason for the change, is there ? > In my opinion, assigning sub-version numbers to what was originally > intended to be, by Red Hat, quarterly updates (almost Service Packs, > if you will, much like SGI's numbering of their Foundation and ProPack > products for the Altix server line) is what is illogical. Of course, > the updates aren't quarterly any more, and other aspects of the > versioning have morphed and changed over the years since the RHAS days > (well, even back in certain branches of RHL 6.2, for that matter). Whatever the original cause...

...my simple eth0 and eth1 but tech moves > on. And that one drives me nuts. It breaks PXE boot kickstart builds. Maybe *you* have all same model systems from the same manufacturer; we've got boxen from...<thinking> at least five or six manufacturers, of varying ages, from the 10+ yr old Altix 3000 from SGI, to the current one from SGI, to my 5 yr old Dell workstation, to some old Penguins and several Suns (soon to set, the sooner the better...). How do you deal with everything from em1 to ens3f0, which comes up *only* after you start to install.... In what conceivable way is this better...

...but tech moves >> on. > And that one drives me nuts. It breaks PXE boot kickstart builds. Maybe > *you* have all same model systems from the same manufacturer; we've got > boxen from...<thinking> at least five or six manufacturers, of varying > ages, from the 10+ yr old Altix 3000 from SGI, to the current one from > SGI, to my 5 yr old Dell workstation, to some old Penguins and several > Suns (soon to set, the sooner the better...). How do you deal with > everything from em1 to ens3f0, which comes up *only* after you start to > install.... In what conceivabl...

...both? I can't really speak for anyone else, but for me, a lot depends on the use of the systems. I typically treat RHEL and CentOS the same way as far as updating to the latest point release. It's never bit me in the past that I am aware of. The only exception to that is with the SGI Altix 4300/4400s I used to manage. We migrated from SLES to RHEL and in those cases, barring a serious enough bug, those boxes were left alone until time came to refresh them, such as the move from RHEL5 to RHEL6. -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at NeoNova 919-460-3330 option 1 mark.haney at neonov...