search for: alsi

Hello, I use SAMBA under OpenBSD 2.8. When the clients log in some times they have a reject : Authentificate Failure... And in the log we can observe the same time : getpeername failed. Error was Socket is not connected ? Can somebody help me please ? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

...d (or any file in the llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ folder). Am I missing something or could this instruction be implemented elsewhere within llvm? I've also done cursory searching, here's a random selection of 12 (out of 525) more instructions that I've confirmed aren't implemented: - ALSI Add Logical with Signed Immediate - BAKR Branch and Stack - BAL Branch and Link - BALR Branch and Link - CEGR Convert from Fixed (SH <- 64) - LFPC Load FPC - MDR Multiply (LH) - STCMY Store Characters under Mask (low) - STMY Store Multiple (32) - TAR Test Access - VACCC Vector Add With Carry Com...

...n the > tcpdump I see that when the original problem happened, in SMB2/create > response, samba returned allocation-size=1MB whereas in my test, this is > not returned. I am not sure how this can happen as SMB2 create request in > tcpdump has > ExtraInfo DHnQ MxAc QFid > (i.e. no ALSI specified in it). Any thoughts? > > Thanks for your inputs! No, sorry, not really. If I had a reproducer I'd probably very quickly be able to see what's going on. The things I'd look at are the debug level 10 log together with the strace. With best regards, Volker -- SerNet...

...e/smb2 test that I wrote is, in the tcpdump I see that when the original problem happened, in SMB2/create response, samba returned allocation-size=1MB whereas in my test, this is not returned. I am not sure how this can happen as SMB2 create request in tcpdump has ExtraInfo DHnQ MxAc QFid (i.e. no ALSI specified in it). Any thoughts? Thanks for your inputs! --Shyam -----Original Message----- From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 12:51 PM To: Shyam Kaushik Cc: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Constant error messages about failure...

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:39:58AM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote: > Hi All, > > Need your help/inputs on what could be the probable cause/how to debug > this further. > > We are using samba-4.0.25 & expose a share that has oplocks enabled & no > kernel-oplocks set. We constantly see these messages in samba logs > > [2015/06/25 03:05:30.593150, 0, pid=1581,

...n the > tcpdump I see that when the original problem happened, in SMB2/create > response, samba returned allocation-size=1MB whereas in my test, this is > not returned. I am not sure how this can happen as SMB2 create request in > tcpdump has > ExtraInfo DHnQ MxAc QFid > (i.e. no ALSI specified in it). Any thoughts? > > Thanks for your inputs! No, sorry, not really. If I had a reproducer I'd probably very quickly be able to see what's going on. The things I'd look at are the debug level 10 log together with the strace. With best regards, Volker -- SerNet G...

Hi All, Need your help/inputs on what could be the probable cause/how to debug this further. We are using samba-4.0.25 & expose a share that has oplocks enabled & no kernel-oplocks set. We constantly see these messages in samba logs [2015/06/25 03:05:30.593150, 0, pid=1581, class=locking] ../source3/smbd/oplock_linux.c:184(linux_release_kernel_oplock) linux_release_kernel_oplock:

...7 Sep 2001 12:36:20 -0400 Reply-To: <tony@mail.applog.com> From: "Tony Nichols" <tony@mail.applog.com> To: "'W. Wilson Ho'" <ho@routefree.com> Cc: "Samba" <samba@lists.samba.org> Subject: RE: how to turn off authentication? Organization: alsi Message-ID: <00ae01c137bb$393b1570$8401a8c0@applog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <3B980627.277BA2FB@routefree.com> X-SLUIDL: 065842D2-F7CE4165-B9396D...

...NOT N 7240: 52 44 59 20 00 40 1e 53 43 49 45 01 47 45 46 43 RDY . at .SCIE.GEFC 7250: 04 47 58 46 43 03 47 45 53 46 08 00 10 50 41 52 .GXFC.GESF...PAR 7260: 4d 20 44 53 4c 50 20 00 40 7a 41 52 44 59 20 41 M DSLP . at zARDY A 7270: 53 4c 43 20 54 43 48 45 20 41 4c 53 49 20 42 43 SLC TCHE ALSI BC 7280: 4c 50 20 50 46 49 54 20 43 42 4c 56 20 42 43 4c LP PFIT CBLV BCL 7290: 4d 40 14 43 50 46 4d 20 45 50 46 4d 20 50 4c 55 M at .CPFM EPFM PLU 72a0: 54 40 25 50 46 4d 42 20 43 43 44 56 20 50 43 46 T@%PFMB CCDV PCF 72b0: 54 20 00 40 2f 47 56 44 31 80 00 0c 50 48 45 44 T .@/GVD1...PH...

...2C for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:45:33 -0400 Reply-To: <tony@mail.applog.com> From: "Tony Nichols" <tony@mail.applog.com> To: "Samba" <samba@lists.samba.org> Subject: MS Access v 2.0 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:45:33 -0400 Organization: alsi Message-ID: <007d01c12b29$dc429890$8401a8c0@applog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-SLUIDL: C672A7D2-B877483B-A11D3AF7-D0F5B2E9 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/related by demime 0.98b X-Conve...

Hi, There seems to be a problem with the power-operation of the form c(..., -a, ...)^x.yyy Four code examples for the same calculation, which perform differently: -3^3.2 Result: [1] -33.63474 c(-3,6)^3.2 Result: [1] NaN 309.0893 But: c(-3.62,3)^3 Result: [1] -47.43793 27.00000 I can reproduce NaN even in the following calculation: c(-3,6)[1]^3.2 Result: [1] NaN but c(-3,6)[2]^3.2 Result: