search for: alphax

I am a volunteer developer for the text editor AlphaX <http://alphatcl.sourceforge.net/wikit/> and the author/maintainer of its "S+/R" mode. We recently received this note from a user: >>>>>>>> I am trying to process files written and edited in AlphaXb16 through R v2.0.1. This has worked previously under t...

...matter what the code is. If the same exact text is typed into the console directly, I get no errors. I tried quitting the R session and restarting. The problem did not go away. I tried using a different editor, instead of the built-in editor. After opening the file with my R code in it in AlphaX instead of the built-in editor, I could see that the text typed most recently ( ie, since the problem started) had a character that looked like an open square or box at the start of most lines. I deleted these and can't see any other extraneous symbols in AlphaX. However, I still get syn...

Hi, I'm using Dovecot 1.0-alpha5 as POP3 server with MySQL DB of users. Sometimes clients get an authentication errors. In this time dovecot writes to log file next lines: Feb 7 11:14:30 orion dovecot: auth-worker(default): sql(user at mydomain.com.ua,192.168.3.36): Password query failed: MySQL client run out of memory Feb 7 11:14:30 orion dovecot: auth-worker(default): sql(user at

Hi to all does someone knows why Samba 3.0 isn?t possible to mount any Shares from a Server ? i used Domain Authentication and the Share Listing works fine. but when i try to mount the share no Error is logged. the Share is listed in mount but isn?t accessible, just the underlayed Folder. umounting brings up the Error //../.. not mounted ... any suggestions and help would be nice 8) using

...ain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I'm sure some of my customers would also freak if they knew I was using > "Alpha" code. Besides, who expects a 1.0 version to be perfect? > > Jeff A. Earickson wrote: > >> For political reasons, I would like to see alphaX promoted to "1.0". >> My boss had a cow the other day when I told her we are running alpha >> code in production. My defense was "you hadn't noticed because it >> works." Or at least call alpha6 something like "beta1" instead. >> >>...

I'd like to make a suggestion. Let's drop the Alpha and come out with an official version 1.0. Here's my reasons. The 0.9x version are obsolete and people should be using the 1.0 Alpha versions which seem to me to do everything the previous versions did and more. It's as full featured and stable as all other IMAP servers and in my opinion is ready to be called 1.0. The