search for: allowerasing

...m CentOS-Base qt5-qttools-common-5.12.5-1.el8.0.1.noarch is from CentOS-Base-Appstream So updating some installed rpm depends on updating to the Appstream version of qt5-qttools and some other installed rpm depends on the original CentOS-Base version of qt5-qttools. I've played around with --allowerasing --best and --nobest but still can't get a clean update. Thanks, Tony -- Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> Home

...= 9.13.1, but none of the providers can be installed ? - problem with installed package drbd-pacemaker-9.11.0-1.el8.x86_64 ? - cannot install the best update candidate for package drbd-9.11.0-1.el8.x86_64 ? - nothing provides pacemaker needed by drbd-pacemaker-9.13.1-1.el8.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) with --nobest yum update runs through without doing anything and I sill have kernel 4.18.0-80.11.2.el8_0.x86_64 Any ideas...

...> CentOS-Base-Appstream > > > > So updating some installed rpm depends on updating to the Appstream > > version of qt5-qttools and some other installed rpm depends on the > > original CentOS-Base version of qt5-qttools. > > > > I've played around with --allowerasing --best and --nobest but > > still > > can't get a clean update. > > We are working out Stream issues right now .. but no, it is not > necessary to have all the repos active. You only have to have one > set > of Base, Appstream, and Extras enabled (CentOS Stream or C...

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 09:48, Philippe Piot <piot at nicadd.niu.edu> wrote: > > No it did not work; see: > [piot at paris ~]$ sudo dnf install --nobest --allowerasing gcc-c++ > Last metadata expiration check: 0:18:24 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 08:28:51 AM CST. > Error: > Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed > - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-hea...

I am doing a dnf install package_without_version for instance for g++: [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf install gcc-c++ Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:06 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 06:45:59 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-headers, but

Just as a followup even g++ is broken: [piot at paris ~]$ g++ bash: g++: command not found... Install package 'gcc-c++' to provide command 'g++'? [N/y] y * Waiting in queue... The following packages have to be downgraded: cpp-8.2.1-3.5.el8.x86_64 The C Preprocessor glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.i686 The GNU libc libraries glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.x86_64 The GNU libc libraries

....12.5-1.el8.0.1.noarch is from > CentOS-Base-Appstream > > So updating some installed rpm depends on updating to the Appstream > version of qt5-qttools and some other installed rpm depends on the > original CentOS-Base version of qt5-qttools. > > I've played around with --allowerasing --best and --nobest but still > can't get a clean update. We are working out Stream issues right now .. but no, it is not necessary to have all the repos active. You only have to have one set of Base, Appstream, and Extras enabled (CentOS Stream or CentOS Linux). Stream standup is very mu...

...e-Appstream >>> >>> So updating some installed rpm depends on updating to the Appstream >>> version of qt5-qttools and some other installed rpm depends on the >>> original CentOS-Base version of qt5-qttools. >>> >>> I've played around with --allowerasing --best and --nobest but >>> still >>> can't get a clean update. >> >> We are working out Stream issues right now .. but no, it is not >> necessary to have all the repos active. You only have to have one >> set >> of Base, Appstream, and Extras en...

when I try: # dnf update grub2-common Last metadata expiration check: 0:50:01 ago on Thu 27 Aug 2020 02:27:52 PM CDT. Error: ?Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: kernel (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) ...so how should I proceed? TIA, Frank

Philippe, What's the output with '--allowerasing' switch? We are experiencing a similar issue, dnf update: ... Problem 53: problem with installed package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 - package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 requires perl-Encode(x86-64) = 4:2.97-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package...

...h libvirt-libs-9.9.0-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and libvirt-libs-9.5.0-1.el9s.x86_64 from @System - cannot install the best update candidate for package python3-libvirt-9.3.0-1.el9.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libvirt-libs-9.5.0-1.el9s.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) # Currently I have python3-libvirt-9.3.0-1.el9.x86_64 installed. Thanks for any advise Gianluca

...d ? - conflicting requests ? - problem with installed package libreport-plugin-mantisbt-2.1.11-53.el7.centos.x86_64 ? - package ipa-client-4.8.0-11.module_el8.1.0+253+3b90c921.x86_64 is excluded ? - package ipa-client-4.8.0-13.module_el8.1.0+265+e1e65be4.x86_64 is excluded (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Ideas? -Frank

...MBA4)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package samba-4.17.2-2.el8.x86_64 requires libutil-tdb-samba4.so(SAMBA_4.17.2_SAMBA4)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package samba-4.16.4-2.el8.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)