On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote:> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe.> On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. > > > > I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and > > CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I > > just have the Appstream repos enabled. > > > > The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating the > > installation. The problem seems to be some installed rpms seem to > > depend on updates from the CentOS-Base repos and others seem to > > depend > > on similar updates from the CentOS-Base-Appstream repos and you > > can't > > install both. > > > > A typical error looks like this. > > > > cannot install both qt5-qttools-common-5.12.5-1.el8.0.1.noarch and > > qt5-qttools-common-5.11.1-9.el8.noarch > > > > qt5-qttools-common-5.11.1-9.el8.noarch is from CentOS-Base > > > > qt5-qttools-common-5.12.5-1.el8.0.1.noarch is from > > CentOS-Base-Appstream > > > > So updating some installed rpm depends on updating to the Appstream > > version of qt5-qttools and some other installed rpm depends on the > > original CentOS-Base version of qt5-qttools. > > > > I've played around with --allowerasing --best and --nobest but > > still > > can't get a clean update. > > We are working out Stream issues right now .. but no, it is not > necessary to have all the repos active. You only have to have one > set > of Base, Appstream, and Extras enabled (CentOS Stream or CentOS > Linux). > > Stream standup is very much a work in progress at this point , but it > is > what i am using as my personal workstation (for whatever that is > worth). > > You SHOULD be able to have both sets enabled though .. and will be > able > to once we have all the issues solved .. but i don't have them both > enabled on my workstation right now, just CentOS Stream. > > Thanks, > Johnny Hughes > >Thanks Johnny. I'll go with the Stream repos enabled and see how that works out. Regards, Tony> _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-- Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> Home
On 4/22/20 9:38 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:> On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University >> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you >> recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > > > >> On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. >>> >>> I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and >>> CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I >>> just have the Appstream repos enabled. >>> >>> The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating the >>> installation. The problem seems to be some installed rpms seem to >>> depend on updates from the CentOS-Base repos and others seem to >>> depend >>> on similar updates from the CentOS-Base-Appstream repos and you >>> can't >>> install both. >>> >>> A typical error looks like this. >>> >>> cannot install both qt5-qttools-common-5.12.5-1.el8.0.1.noarch and >>> qt5-qttools-common-5.11.1-9.el8.noarch >>> >>> qt5-qttools-common-5.11.1-9.el8.noarch is from CentOS-Base >>> >>> qt5-qttools-common-5.12.5-1.el8.0.1.noarch is from >>> CentOS-Base-Appstream >>> >>> So updating some installed rpm depends on updating to the Appstream >>> version of qt5-qttools and some other installed rpm depends on the >>> original CentOS-Base version of qt5-qttools. >>> >>> I've played around with --allowerasing --best and --nobest but >>> still >>> can't get a clean update. >> >> We are working out Stream issues right now .. but no, it is not >> necessary to have all the repos active. You only have to have one >> set >> of Base, Appstream, and Extras enabled (CentOS Stream or CentOS >> Linux). >> >> Stream standup is very much a work in progress at this point , but it >> is >> what i am using as my personal workstation (for whatever that is >> worth). >> >> You SHOULD be able to have both sets enabled though .. and will be >> able >> to once we have all the issues solved .. but i don't have them both >> enabled on my workstation right now, just CentOS Stream. >> >> Thanks, >> Johnny Hughes >> >> > > Thanks Johnny. I'll go with the Stream repos enabled and see how that > works out. >For the record .. i just updated to what we have in the QA stream and it worked OK .. I expect that out soon (next day or so i think) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20200423/a3fbd99a/attachment.sig>
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 09:29 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote:> > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Johnny. I'll go with the Stream repos enabled and see how > > that > > works out. > > > > For the record .. i just updated to what we have in the QA stream and > it > worked OK .. I expect that out soon (next day or so i think) > >Okay Thanks I'll form the weekend and do a new install. Regards, Tony> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.o--Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> Home