search for: all_load

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "all_load".

2010 Apr 28
2
[LLVMdev] Is the option --enable-shared discontinued in 2.7?
Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > We currently use two different techniques to get whole libraries > included into the .so. On Linux (gnu ld and gold), we pass > --whole-archive, while on OSX we pass -all_load. Which ld does FreeBSD > use? If you can rearrange tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile until it works for > you and send us a patch, we can probably get it working for llvm-2.8. > ld on FreeBSD is from binutils. It takes --whole-archive option. But command line needs to be changed: actual arch...
2010 Apr 28
0
[LLVMdev] Is the option --enable-shared discontinued in 2.7?
...ve unknown imports, > not to be just included into .so library. > > All .o files should be listed in the command line instead. We currently use two different techniques to get whole libraries included into the .so. On Linux (gnu ld and gold), we pass --whole-archive, while on OSX we pass -all_load. Which ld does FreeBSD use? If you can rearrange tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile until it works for you and send us a patch, we can probably get it working for llvm-2.8.
2010 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Is the option --enable-shared discontinued in 2.7?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >> >> We currently use two different techniques to get whole libraries >> included into the .so. On Linux (gnu ld and gold), we pass >> --whole-archive, while on OSX we pass -all_load. Which ld does FreeBSD >> use? If you can rearrange tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile until it works for >> you and send us a patch, we can probably get it working for llvm-2.8. >> > > > ld on FreeBSD is from binutils. It takes --whole-archive option. Would you try the patch at...
2010 Apr 28
4
[LLVMdev] Is the option --enable-shared discontinued in 2.7?
Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > I just tried it again on trunk (not 2.7) on OSX 10.5, and it works. > What platform are you on? Does it work with another version of gcc? > Looks like this is platform dependent. libLLVM-2.7.so created has size only 4145 bytes and all llvm symbols are missing. It's empty because there are no .o modules included into it, only libraries through -l options
2009 Jun 17
1
[LLVMdev] Configure problem of llvm2.5 in Mac OS X 10.4.11
...ac_cv_env_build_alias_set= ac_cv_env_build_alias_value= ac_cv_env_host_alias_set= ac_cv_env_host_alias_value= ac_cv_env_target_alias_set= ac_cv_env_target_alias_value= ac_cv_host=powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC=gcc ac_cv_target=powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 llvm_cv_link_all_option=-Wl,-all_load llvm_cv_no_link_all_option=-Wl,-noall_load llvm_cv_os_type=Darwin llvm_cv_platform_type=Unix llvm_cv_target_arch=PowerPC ## ----------------- ## ## Output variables. ## ## ----------------- ## ALLOCA='' ALL_BINDINGS='' AR='' ARCH='PowerPC' BINDINGS_TO_BUILD='...
2009 Jun 18
0
[LLVMdev] Configure problem of llvm2.5 in Mac OS X 10.4.11
...ld_alias_value= > ac_cv_env_host_alias_set= > ac_cv_env_host_alias_value= > ac_cv_env_target_alias_set= > ac_cv_env_target_alias_value= > ac_cv_host=powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 > ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC =gcc > ac_cv_target=powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 > llvm_cv_link_all_option=-Wl,-all_load > llvm_cv_no_link_all_option=-Wl,-noall_load > llvm_cv_os_type=Darwin > llvm_cv_platform_type=Unix > llvm_cv_target_arch=PowerPC > > ## ----------------- ## > ## Output variables. ## > ## ----------------- ## > > ALLOCA='' > ALL_BINDINGS='' > AR=&...
2016 Oct 11
0
PKG_LIBS in make child processes
...ive sub-directory, then these static libraries are copied to src/, and finally the static libraries are integrated into msa.so. The Makevars file looks as follows: PKG_LIBS=`${R_HOME}/bin${R_ARCH_BIN}/Rscript -e "if (Sys.info()['sysname'] == 'Darwin') cat('-Wl,-all_load ./libgc.a ./libClustalW.a ./libClustalOmega.a ./libMuscle.a') else cat('-Wl,--whole-archive ./libgc.a ./libClustalW.a ./libClustalOmega.a ./libMuscle.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive')"` PKG_CXXFLAGS=-I"./gc-7.2/include" -I"./Muscle/" -I"./Clus...
2007 Jan 30
1
Error message when building a package
...ile [...] [-filelist listfile[,dirname]] [-arch_only arch] [-o output] [-install_name name] [-compatibility_version #] [-current_version #] [-seg1addr 0x#] [-segs_read_only_addr 0x#] [-segs_read_write_addr 0x#] [-seg_addr_table <filename>] [-seg_addr_table_filename <file_system_path>] [-all_load] [-noall_load] make: *** [roots.so] Error 1 chmod: /../myrlibrary/roots/libs/ppc/*: No such file or directory ERROR: compilation failed for package 'roots' ** Removing '/../myrlibrary/roots' ============================================================================ One thing I ca...
2007 Apr 05
1
Problem installing rgdal on Mac OS X
...[...] [-filelist listfile[,dirname]] [-arch_only arch] [-o output] [-install_name name] [-compatibility_version #] [-current_version #] [-seg1addr 0x#] [-segs_read_only_addr 0x#] [-segs_read_write_addr 0x#] [-seg_addr_table <filename>] [-seg_addr_table_filename <file_system_path>] [-all_load] [-noall_load] make: *** [rgdal.so] Error 1 chmod: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.4/Resources/library/rgdal/libs/ppc/*: No such file or directory ERROR: compilation failed for package 'rgdal' ** Removing '/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.4/Resources/library/rgd...
2010 May 04
3
[LLVMdev] Is the option --enable-shared discontinued in 2.7?
...0 at 10:48 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: >> Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >>> >>> We currently use two different techniques to get whole libraries >>> included into the .so. On Linux (gnu ld and gold), we pass >>> --whole-archive, while on OSX we pass -all_load. Which ld does FreeBSD >>> use? If you can rearrange tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile until it works for >>> you and send us a patch, we can probably get it working for llvm-2.8. >>> >> >> >> ld on FreeBSD is from binutils. It takes --whole-archive option. >...
2017 Jun 07
3
LLD support for ld64 mach-o linker synthesised symbols
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > OK. I see that the Mach-O linker is not even built when LLD is enabled in > Release_40, only the PE/COFF and ELF linkers are built. > > From looking at reviews it appears that Clang was able to be linked with > LLD on Darwin about 2 years ago, so Mach-O support seems to have