search for: alfi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 25 matches for "alfi".

Did you mean: alfa
2009 Feb 26
1
T-test by groups
I would like to run a t-test within a "by" group function. My dataset, "error", is organized as the following (I have 133 Sites): Site week Dataset Region lat_map long_map mean_tsim diff20 diff40 diff80 ALFI 15 USACE UC 48.15625 -117.0938 8.87 1.34 1.90 2.98 ALFI 16 USACE UC 48.15625 -117.0938 10.28 0.57 1.08 2.27 ALFI 17 USACE UC 48.15625 -117.0938 11.08 0.74 1.30 2.52 ALFI 18 USACE UC 48.15625 -117.0938 12.23 0.42 1.11 2...
2004 Jul 09
5
RE: the "cisco vs. Linux" thread
FYI this topic has been covered on the Zebra and Quagga lists - hardware processors, memory, NICs, etc - software OS (Linux, *BSD), drivers, etc I''ve been running a couple of Linux routers for about 2 years now, I''m using them as core routers so I bought a couple of rackmount "server" boxes with redundant PSUs and h/w RAID (1) for hotswap disks. I''m using
2010 May 14
2
Local Filesystem Access
Is it possible for processes on a glusterfs server to read and write to files that are exported, like with NFS. And if so how does this affect replication? Thanks.
2004 Jul 08
15
Re: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1809 - 14 msgs
Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My
2004 May 15
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote: > if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then > - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report > + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \ > + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?" > fi > } > > @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@ > # Add a footer
2007 Dec 13
1
mod_proxy_balancer mod_rewrite permission issue
...write. My question is, could this "Allow from all" be a latent security problem? and is there anybody faced the same issue? Could I miss something through the configuration or did the mongrel-apache document miss something? I am sorry my English is not very good. Best wishes everyone, Alfie ZHU -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20071213/290993c1/attachment.html
2004 Jun 13
1
intermittent access this week
Hey team, I'll be at sea on and off this week, and as such my Internet access will depend on wifi availability while in port. 22a seems stable, but if any critical problems arise, feel free to prepare a release and bug Alfie to upload it. On the brighter side, I expect to be extremely bored while offline so I'll probably get some logcheck work done. <: Cheers, -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :...
2004 Nov 21
2
Bug#282378: logcheck-database: messages from USB joystick use
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.31 Severity: wishlist The following is reported by logcheck when inserting a USB joystick for the first time (workstation), none of which (I assume) I need to be informed of. Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.2: wakeup Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using address 2 Nov 21 17:50:10 localhost kernel:
2006 Mar 13
0
Call Parking Grandstream
...where the call is being parked to the person parking the call at the time the call is being parked. How ever in my setup I hear nothing but if I dial the default parked extension I get back the call. Am I missing something? Or should I be using something like ParkAndAnnounce? Thanks. -Alfie
2004 May 25
2
Bug#222240: Ask for frequency during install (logcheck)
hello, the debconf configuration of logcheck was removed since woody release: as logcheck's user base is targeting server admins, we don't see the need of a debconf based question regarding the frequency of logcheck. beside once per day is a good default. a note was added to documentation README.Debian that this value may be changed in /etc/cron.d/logcheck. so these bugreports will be
2004 Jul 12
0
[patch] logtail recheck permissions of offset files
...ore checking in that chown fix, i wanted you to take a look. tested on my workstation. basicaly the patch takes care that logtail saves the offset file with the correct permissions. when playing around lately with file tampering and those invoking logcheck as root. i got similar output to #253998 Alfie may point out that i should not invoke logcheck as root, but i better fix that before users complain. patch shameless copied from perlfunc(1) a++ maks ps if you know a better solution of dropping root privileges right from the start like if [ $UID = 0 ]; then become logcheck. i'd like to hea...
2001 Nov 12
4
2.4.14 ext3
i have patched the kernel and recompiled the kernel with the ext3 support, however, when i boot up, i get this error below, what have i missed ? request_module[block-major-3]: Root fs not mounted VFS: Cannot open root device "hda6" or 03:06 Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:06
2004 Jun 03
1
4 important bugs again <;
hello everyone, thanks to todd 1.2.21 is out :) every release getting better, i would like to get consensus on these "important" bugs: #252078 logtail: should depend on perl >= 5.8 sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x, it's even inside of its base. backports are under the peril of its author if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days.
2004 May 21
2
Bug#247360: logcheck: Where's NEWS.Debian?
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #247360 I can't find NEWS.Debian in the package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser
2004 May 28
2
Bug#251364: logcheck: preinst has bashism, fails with dash and LANG != C
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: serious Tags: patch On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this: # apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23% Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de
2004 Oct 21
3
Bug#277636: logcheck-database: support for dnsmasq
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: wishlist Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile? This is the standard dnsmasq output. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2005 Jan 16
1
Re: Bug#181699: #181699 Re: #181699 wine: vague error message: "dramatically effect" in what way?
...nstead let Wine create its own fake windows drive automatically, and you then supply some of the missing DLLs using Winetools. A link to Winetools can be found on the Wine downloads page, along with packages for the latest release of Wine. Thanks, Scott Ritchie On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 19:06 -0500, Alfie Costa wrote: > I was rereading old bugs and thought I'd have another go at this one. > The story so far: > > Current: > > Note that one change you can make that will dramatically > effect Wine's behaviour is to change whether or not > Wine uses a t...
2004 Aug 23
2
Bug#267587: logcheck-database: Additional rule needed for postfix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.25 Severity: normal postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: lost connection after (CONNECT|DATA|RCPT|RSET|EHLO|HELO|MAIL) from Please include the above line in the ignore.d/server/postfix file. That catches messages that occur very often on busy Postfix servers. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal Tags: patch The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM. -- System Information: Debian Release:
2004 Dec 25
2
Bug#287184: logcheck overwriting ownership/permissions of /etc/logcheck/* on upgrades
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.32 Severity: important In postinst logcheck "fixes" permissions of /etc/logcheck/* to 750. In my (and others on #d-d) opinion ownership and permissions should be preserved upon package upgrades. Logcheck must not screw with my decision to make them world readable every time it configures. -- Peter