search for: alchemyx

...filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 flowid 10:2 Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "10:2" is unparsable It is from example in LARTC Howto. My question is then - how to make a filter matching all without eating too much CPU cycles? Thanks -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

...faramir(config)# ip route 1.2.3.0/24 80.245.176.13 faramir(config)# ip route 1.2.3.0/24 80.245.176.11 Then: # ip r s [...] 1.2.3.0/24 nexthop via 80.245.176.11 dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0 weight 1 Please help, I am out of ideas. -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

Hi I''m setting up shaping using HTB and hashkey. It seems like there is a limit on the number of classid''s at 10000? How can I go higher than 10000? This is what my output say when I reach classid number 10000: ... ... /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:6 classid 2:9998 htb prio 5 rate 768kbit ceil 768kbit burst 0 cburst 0 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:9998 handle

...ent value by IPMARK module. On eth1 it is not necessary so I use dst hash. I have more values than 2^13 so I can''t use direct hash. Any ideas? Is it possible to use bigger divisor or algorithm is not designed to deal with bigger hash? Any ideas will be appreciated! -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

Refering to pppoe i have next problem : I asked my isp if i can buy a class of real ip`s to be routed by them. They said elegantly it can`t be done . I want opinions . I am using an ADSL connection through a Speedtouch 510 configured in bridge. About Bgp : i asked someone if i can peer 2 different locations on 2 different ip`s using private asn number and he said yes , and what i don`t

...0a handle 100a:0 sfq perturb 10 6: filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 pref 30 u32 match ip dst 10.100.0.10 flowid 1:100a Tried to remove line 3 and just putting one line instead: filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip pref 30 fw But it does not work. Any ideas? -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

Hello! I think 36th line of ipt_MARK which is (*pskb)->nfcache |= NFC_ALTERED; Should be removed. At least looking at that patch: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-July/020382.html -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

Hi I have read various info, and mailing list archives, but have not found an answer to the following. I have a few servers with configurations similar to the following: They each have multiple uplinks to the Internet, and a sample config is as follows: eth1 is 192.168.0.1, connected to 192.168.0.2 eth2 is 192.168.1.1, connected to 192.168.1.2 My default route looks like: ip route add scope