search for: aj14889

Hi, In my llvm code I want to create some function calls. The function prototype is as follows: int memoize ( char *function_name, int *int_params, unsigned num_ints, double *double_params, unsigned num_doubles) In order to create these calls I do the following for example: %88 = alloca [7 x i8] store volatile [7 x i8] c"ORACLE\00", [7 x i8]*

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ali Javadi <aj14889 at yahoo.com> wrote: > I am keeping all the types of C, and adding my new types. I thought that, > for example, I can't map my new type to i32 because that's used for C > integers. That's what I meant by already used. Am I missing something? If the type behaves like an i32...

Stack colouring should be able to reuse the same stack space, if the live ranges of the pointers don't overlap. But I don't think anyone has built a general solution for alloca'd space. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Ali Javadi <aj14889 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In my llvm code I want to create some function calls. The function > prototype is as follows: > > int memoize ( char *function_name, > int *int_params, unsigned num_ints, > double *double_params, unsigned num_...

Hi Sean, >> Can I just utilize the i1 type? Is the >> i1 type already used for something, and thus might create a conflict? > > I think you are very confused. LLVM's types are meant to be used to > represent *your* program :) They can't be "already used". I am keeping all the types of C, and adding my new types. I thought that, for example, I can't map

Hi, I have some newly defined intrinsic functions in my llvm IR code, which I want to translate to X86 instruction set. As a first step, I want to be able to generate "nop" for these instructions, so the program at least compiles successfully. The call to my intrinsic function looks like this in the IR: call void @llvm.X(i16 %43) >From what I understand it may be possible to

Hi, In LLVM (using the opt tool), is it possible to force a nested loop be unrolled entirely? Something like a pass option? I have a nested loop with depth of 4, and all trip counts are known at compile time, but so far I've only been able to do this by 4 invocations of the -loop-simplify, -loop-rotate, -loop-unroll passes. Thanks, Ali

Hi there, I asked this a few days ago and Sean gave a useful answer. Going back to the second question below, I want to clarify something. On Feb 3, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ali Javadi <aj14889 at yahoo.com> wrote: >> I am keeping all the types of C, and adding my new types. I thought that, >> for example, I can't map my new type to i32 because that's used for C >> integers. That's what I meant by already used. Am I missing something? > > If the typ...

Hi, I'm writing a pass that collects some information from functions, but this requires constant propagation/constant folding to be done on those functions beforehand. However some of these functions have an integer argument that can take certain constant values, and the functions are always called with these constant values at their various call sites. What I'm trying to do is to look at

Hi, I have the C program below, which contains a mathematical expression. C code: ====== void ControlledRotationPiMinus(int target, int control, int j) { ControlledPhase(target,control,-PI/(2*pow(2,j))); } int main() { .. int b = 3; for (int j=1; j < b; j++) ControlledRotationPiMinus(target, control, j); .. } Here is what I am doing: The function ControlledRotationPiMinus is called

Hi, I have a project where I am creating a language which is very similar to C, but has some extensions. Among the most important are: 1) A new 1-bit data-type 2) Some gates: NOT, AND, etc.. that act on arrays of this 1-bit type. (Think like a hardware description language.) These are like external function calls, which don't have an implementation for now. I don't have a particular