Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "ahx".
Did you mean:
ah
2018 Aug 03
0
BUG: --link-dest may follow symlinks and failure to hard link a non-regular file is fatal
...-x
if [ -d /tmp/rsync_bug ]; then
umount /tmp/rsync_bug/mnt
rm -rf /tmp/rsync_bug
fi
mkdir /tmp/rsync_bug
cd /tmp/rsync_bug
mkdir mnt
mount -t tmpfs tmpfs mnt
ln -s BLABLA mnt/test
mkdir src
ln -s /tmp/rsync_bug/mnt src/dir
rsync -aHx --delete --numeric-ids src/ dst1
rm src/dir
mkdir src/dir
cp -a mnt/test src/dir/
rsync -aHx --delete --numeric-ids --link-dest /tmp/rsync_bug/dst1 src/ dst2 || echo RSYNC FAIL
Output for me:
buczek at theinternet:~$ sudo ./rsync-bug.sh
+ '[' -d /tmp/rsyn...
2008 Jun 10
2
delete-delay vs. delete-after in 3.0.2 (and possible bug)
...iced today, that --delete-delay introduced in 3.0.2 is not
functionally equivalent of --delete-after (I was under impression it
should work this way).
Looking at following example:
/src
/src/testfile
/src/.rf
/dst
/dst/testfile
.rf consists of following lines:
S, .rf
H, *
P, testfile
rsync -aHx --delete-after --filter="dir-merge, .rf" /src/ /dst/
...will execute properly - which means that already existing testfile in
/dst will not be removed.
But if I execute:
rsync -aHx --delete-delay --filter="dir-merge, .rf" /src/ /dst/
...testfile will be removed, unless .rf...
2013 Sep 13
2
Cloning CentOS workstations
...uot; to do this, but it can take a
while since it blanks each partition before copying, and requires a system
shutdown.
Question 1: Would it be sufficient to simply use CloneZilla once to initialize
the backup drive (or do it manually, but CloneZilla makes it easy-peasy), and
then use "rsync -aHx --delete" (let me know if I missed an important rsync
option) to update the clone partitions from then on? I am assuming that the
MBR typically doesn't get rewritten during system updates, though
"/etc/grub.conf" obviously does get changed.
Suppose I want to store more than one...
2003 Sep 18
2
bad hardlinks with rsync
...rsync.samba.org/>
Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks,
batchfiles,
IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums
invocation:
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
rsync | -v | -aHx | --numeric-ids | --delete |
--exclude-from=Synchronisationsausnahmen | / | 192.168.1.1:/
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
tail of the logfile:
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&l...
2005 Apr 29
0
[Bug 2670] New: rsync does not support Solaris' doorfs
...Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: zosh@ife.ee.ethz.ch
QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org
rsync does not recognize the Solaris doorfs:
Copy c2t1d0s0 (mounted on /) using rsync -aHx --delete
skipping non-regular file "dev/.devfsadm_synch_door"
skipping non-regular file "etc/sysevent/devfsadm_event_channel/1"
...
ls -l /dev/.devfsadm_synch_door:
Drw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 22 20:29 /dev/.
devfsadm_synch_door>
This applied to all rsync...
2005 Apr 29
2
[Bug 2670] rsync does not support Solaris' doorfs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2670
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-04-29 12:42
2009 Feb 06
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6095] New: code 23 when files or directories disappear, instead of code 24.
...ode had changed - until a run earlier this week
gave me the previously expected code 24.
Google has a number of postings for rsync code 23, all but one were from
3.0.4, the other was from 3.0.2. Most of them are just logs.
Yesterday, I updated to 3.0.5 on x86 and tested. The command is rsync -aHx
--delete --numeric-ids /home /nfs/staging/ . By untarring a package, starting
the wrapper, then deleting the package 2 or 3 seconds later, I got:
Thu Feb 5 22:35:23 GMT 2009 rsyncing
rsync: link_stat "/home/ken/abiword-extras-2.6.6" failed: No such file or
directory (2)
IO error encount...
2008 Feb 25
0
Fwd: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes
...ith-
flags","com.apple.FinderInfo") failed: Unknown error: -5000 (-5000)
And error -5000 means:
afpAccessDenied
-5000
User does not have the correct access to the file
Directory cannot be shared
Available in Mac OS X v10.0 and later.
In another hand, if I run rsync with options:
-aHXN --fileflags -> error
-aHN --fileflags -> no error
-aHX -> no error
-aHXN -> no error
So it's seems that there is a conflict between fileflags and my patch.
I guess that both are trying to set things on the same file at the
(almost) same time and one is blocking the other to do...
2020 Feb 27
2
[PATCH] Update the 5 year logo to 10 year logo
...tEI`~p
z&cJ&Lg<_N_iiWLQx0XKqV4~2m)n$a@&q1t)wF9GJ{O8vYzW(}K>eO-O_mO!xlpcTd
z^8%s>X{nHqXhKqgh`EaoE^S|<G%tg!1B+<!oPITcq<FZP=ttXcVq{|%R?a|oat?vP
z6|Y5<6vLUbCZwh)a0-7O+u%-Rl~a;PNp>nZmyeQhb{8et$+)|h;^Cpe<l*G~%W*x+
zmEjvcMUn*a&8;}zviqZ-^nVxuk^h_tC*tK{_&l$_>aHX^h1?tG(3KWpQ8(!Jn#1*f
zmSXBySN8TAzwdW`TCtw#-g42xao5K)F2bGqecqLgZGN*2(~LeO+NP6itRjN4_b@AI
zG(CSjr(f#h>PZfN`xXhQS$yj@k7(;Vo!KVZ96Sn6<60PlSIK#NO3veyAA?bTJnuC=
z!X=9*s{^Lc>99>pz#-`dwrL3{bh6@>EJ<R$APB$P+pG4hS<~;Kt6!c4h^lb_rYIDO
zHzY|i?9rnKQ$Ku@u;9~B^cjfNyk2D3kN^DEim$)^mPQQ%`L)jpR7KaT...