search for: againe

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 212 matches for "againe".

Did you mean: again
2007 Apr 09
0
[Bug 557] New: Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=557 Summary: Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl Product: iptables Version: CVS (please indicate Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
2006 Jun 09
7
Active DIrectory
I am building a application for my university and I would like to make this application authenticate agains a Active Directory server. I would like to know if there is an already built solution for this somewhere online ? Thanks -- Nicolas Kassis -------------------- http://www.nickassis.net http://www.nickassis.net/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2015 Mar 27
4
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
I will install cyrus-sasl and see how it goes. Anyway, it would be nice to have same features (authentication agains imap) in dovecot. On 27 Mar 2015, at 16:27, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 14:58: > >> I don?t want to allow public network facing servers to be able to >> reach passwords database. And I want to
2005 Jan 25
0
ACLs agains :(
Hello, I am running Slackware 9.1. Kernel: linux-2.4.22 Samba 3.0.10 with acl Kernel supports ACL with XFS. My problem: On Windows XP e can't see the entire directory ACL. I can only see POSIX ACL(owner+group+world) And I cant modify any ACL from windows. Always get access denied. On Linux side everything works great(getfacl, setfacl, etc). How can I see the entire ACL list
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bug 557] Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=557 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Version|CVS (please indicate |1.1.2 -------
2014 Apr 08
2
OpenSSL Heartbeat exploit agains KVM guest systems
Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl, is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost itself? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James
2014 Apr 08
2
OpenSSL Heartbeat exploit agains KVM guest systems
Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl, is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost itself? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James
2015 Jun 23
3
is it safe to have two backed used for the same user?
hi everybody I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user databases for the same one user. I'm thinking, mail to me via pam mail to me at this.domain via ldap whole Maildir would be essentially the same one storage target, I see permissions have to be mangled, available to write for both vmail and actual uid. what do you think? Is it how it's done? regards
2007 Sep 01
4
OT: 4 dual cores agains 2 quad cores
Hi people, Do you have pointers to web documents that help me make comparisons between buying a server with two quad core 2.33 ghz or buying a 4 dual core 2ghz server? I am trying to answer a question of performance. It is not important the redundancy/failover or the price of the server. Just the performance. obviously all the hardware specs are the same, the question is the CPU. --
2015 Jun 23
1
is it safe to have two backed used for the same user?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: > >> I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user databases for the >> same one user. >> I'm thinking, >> mail to me via pam >> mail to me at this.domain via ldap > > the first passdb wins. No problem. >
2016 Oct 05
3
Failure gpupdate
Yes, I performed tests on both DC's. 2 DC's working normally. The sysvolreset works in both DC's after I disabled full_audit. The gpupdate / force works perfectly. And also through the RSAT, I do not get more permission error when I edit any GPO. If this is a bug, who can inform / report? What I find strange in DC's, is when I view the sysvol permissions. The DC2 appears the
2017 Oct 10
3
Domain member server: user access
Am 2017-10-10 um 16:43 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Here, a script you can use as start point. ;-) > > Run it and it shows the command to "edit" the sam.ldb. > Just replace ldbedit with ldbsearch and script agains it. looks promising already, thanks a lot
2008 Jan 03
3
[LLVMdev] Utilizing gperf for TableGen
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Chris Lattner wrote: >This should be fixed now, please verify, thanks! > >-Chris The newer code that TableGen produces is indeed lower however, MSVC still throws the same error messages (and moreover, I don't think they're fixing it anytime soon.. I'll try to re-open this issue to them). Also, it seems that the new code produces an extraneous "if
2006 Jan 18
1
Helps!!!!! Rails database connection guru needed!!!!!!!
Hi, I really need help to understand what is happening while Rails connect to a database, (we area actually using postgresql, so my example will be with postgresql) What I understand is Rails is able to connect to different DB. Actually, this is what we want, and we have made some tests, everything is juste fine. However, all these tests lead us to some important questions that we did find the
2016 Oct 05
3
Failure gpupdate
Dear James and Lingpanda Here I have 2 DC's running. Everything was running perfectly. The problem started after I started to rsync to synchronize the Sysvol folder between DC's. I believe it is a permission problem in the GPO's or Sysvol folder. Another detail. Even accessing the gpedit Group Polic Manager via RSAT using the Administrator User, I can no longer edit any GPO. I get
2007 Jul 18
3
still about winbind idmap customization
Hi, i've read the thread about idmap customization, i'm planning an integration between windows AD and MIT kerberos, and i was very interested on the subject. Now we are authenticating windows AD user against mit kerberos realm with a cross-domain trust, and with windows client everythings works. Ie. Authentication is done with kerberos mit and authorization is done with windows AD.
2007 Dec 25
2
Simple File I/O benchmark tool for NT clients
Hi, I need a simple tool for benchmarking my NT client against my Ubuntu Samba server. I get 20MB/s during a file copy but I think my limit is the client's hard disk. Dose anyone know a simple exe tool which simulate file I/O agains the Samba server. I like to avoid using my lokal disk during the test. Have looked around but can't find a simpe tool which dose the job without the need of
2012 Feb 07
2
predict.naiveBayes() bug in e1071 package
Hi, I'm currently using the R package e1071 to train naive bayes classifiers and came across a bug: When the posterior probabilities of all classes are small, the result from the predict.naiveBayes function become NaNs. This is an issue with the treatment of the log-transformed probabilities inside the predict.naiveBayes function. Here is an example to demonstrate the problem (you might need
2004 Sep 29
4
Scalability
Hello everyone, I want an opinion from people who tryed different matching modules to match diferent types of traffic, especially p2p ones. I would like to hear which scales better as CPU usage and latency : ipp2p, iptables-p2p or l7-filter with the p2p patterns. I want to use one of them to block most of p2p (except maybe dc++ and emule which i want to shape). I would use the matching rules in
2009 Jan 27
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: -fwritable-strings Change
Hello, Bill >> >> I don't see anything obvious wrong, but this is an easy area to >> break. >> I'd recommend running the gcc testsuite and checking for regressions. >> > Okay, that's a good plan. I'm strongly agains any target-specific and language-specific hacks in the generic tree-conversion code. What if we decide to support objc on