search for: ag4ve

This got me thinking, shouldn't this go through PAM so that password strength restrictions can be set as well? Obviously most ssh keys are created locally. But, if this were implemented, I think most distros would adopt the same strength criteria on this as they do with passwd and the like. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net>

Hi there, I'm in a situation where some of my clients have all these obscurity things with ssh, like putting it on a different port, or a different user to login for this specific host not mention several don't have proper DNS names and and and. Life is to short to debate it with the client so rather get in line, use ssh_config, and continue to serve the client. However, now I have the

...setup samba4 from cvs; how stable is it currently, what changes might be made that would effect a current configuration, or what might a future release break in current cvs. 5. how far is current cvs from being samba4-stable? (estimated date and feature set) thanx darkhaven (aka - shawn wilson / ag4ve) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Variables such as %u, %r, etc are only interpreted sometimes. Is there any reason they shouldn't always be expanded? Ie, if I want a config that I could send to many users, I might want to do: User %u123 Thinking that I can derrive a the username from what they are using to login with. However, this doesn't work. So, I started wondering, It's probably harder to limit where these

% cat ext_rsa.pub| sed -r 's/.*(AAAA[^ ]+).*/\1/' | sha256sum ~/.ssh swlap1 d4bf8b06f2d9d9af7a11583a5367205ed310a84f0dee68d062e2ddca1e85c3ff - % ssh-keygen -lf ext_rsa.pub ~/.ssh swlap1 8192 SHA256:FgrfxmdjTM/j4wwRa7nVdPSUaJdqHYMJtJ6aciPl9ug swilson at swlap1 (RSA) Why do those differ and how would i generate the equivalent (mainly just curious)? I've also tried base64 and a