Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "afirmative".
Did you mean:
affirmative
2001 Dec 20
2
R for solaris
Dear members in the group. I am trying to start using R. The unix
systme we have in my university is solaris 7. Is there a version of R
for Solaris 7?. If afirmative where could I get it?
Thanks in advance.
Jose A. Farfan
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "b...
2006 Sep 19
5
VT 64bit kernel with >4Gb RAM
...understanding, if I had a 64bit kernel I''d see them (pae beeing
only for 32bit systems, right ?)
And I''m guessing if I want to VMise 64bit OSes, I''ll need it.
So :
Is there a debian prepackaged kernel that''d do the trick, or do I have
to compile my own ?
In the afirmative, what patch should I apply and where is that friendly
64bit option ?
Is there something else I''m missing ?
Thanks,
GdL.
references :
# uname -r
2.6.16-1-xen-686 (the one from "deb
http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main")
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 451...
2009 May 09
1
determination of where a call is placed from (physical location)
...ss such as one party notification vs 2 party notification
requirements which depend upon the physical endpoints of a call. If I
wish to discretely record all incoming calls except those calling from
a place requiring 2 party notification (thus avoiding the need for an
overt announcement) How can I afirmatively determine the physical
location of the party originating the call and thus the applicable
legal jurisdiction.
Eric Fort
2007 May 14
13
Multihome load balancing - kernel vs netfilter
Hi,
I have searched the archives on the topic, and it seems that the list
gurus favor load balancing to be done in the kernel as opposed to other
means. I have been using a home-grown approach, which splits traffic
based on `-m statistic --mode random --probability X`, then CONNMARKs
the individual connections and the kernel happily routes them. I
understand that for > 2 links it will become
2009 Jun 25
1
interaction terms formula error
Hi,
I'm trying to fit a binary logistic regression model, and would like to consider certain characteristics B and C only for people with variable A=1 and not for those with variable A=0, so I'm trying to do the following:
model<- lrm(formula= y ~ A: (B+C) + D + E +...)
I've had no problem with adding interaction terms using " * ", but every time I try to use