search for: afield

In message <20050731135919.GA43753@afields.ca>, Allan Fields writes: >Yes, this is all very nice, but when is someone actually going to >commit it? ;) I'm (as always) short of time, and GBDE is not the top priority for me for the time being. So I am more than happy to see people band together and improve gbde. The main wor...

...to the managing recruitment partner, Hendron Wood Resource Solutions: http://www.hendronwood.com/vacancy.php?ref=1415AG Selected applicants will be contacted for initial consultation by telephone prior to interview in Bristol, UK (initial telephone/video interview may be possible for those further afield). Enquiries are welcomed, on +44 (0)7710 794225, or by email: andrew at hendronwood.co.uk. The employer is only able to consider applicants already holding full clearance for employment in the UK.

I''d like to see if we can use DTrace to as the kernel implementation of the BSD systrace security policy system (http://www.systrace.org). I don''t really want to port systrace to Solaris because I think with DTrace we already have all the necessary in kernel hooks to do this. With systrace you express things like: "httpd can bind to port 80 but not any other port, it

...to the managing recruitment partner, Hendron Wood Resource Solutions: http://www.hendronwood.com/vacancy.php?ref=1415AG Selected applicants will be contacted for initial consultation by telephone prior to interview in Bristol, UK (initial telephone/video interview may be possible for those further afield). Enquiries are welcomed, on +44 (0)7710 794225, or by email: andrew at hendronwood.co.uk. The employer is only able to consider applicants already holding full clearance for employment in the UK.

...the line number information and information about local variables. There would of course be various standard libraries for common tasks that are compatible with this runtime environment, but I'm going to declare those out of scope for the moment, to prevent the discussion from ranging too far afield. At the same time, you'd probably want a few core types (like String) to be standardized. This runtime environment would be mainly targeted at AOT (Ahead Of Time) compiled languages. That is the primary distinguishing feature compared to something like the JVM or CLR. Given that brief descrip...

...and use R's IQR function instead of yours. ... so I still don't get why you want to return a character string instead of a value for the IQR; and the mode of a sample defined as above is generally a bad estimator of the mode of the distribution. To say more than that would take me too far afield. Post on stats.stackexchange.com if you want to know why (if it's even relevant). Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip...

All, This is more of a theoretical question I suppose - I''m looking for what the consensus is for the "correct" approach in Rails/MVC. I have a standard security model where a User can have many Roles. There is a User model, a Role model, and in the db, a linking table, etc. Each role has a name as well as a category (say, name="waiter", category="restaurant

Dear all, I tried to port Transparent Cryptographic File System (http://www.tcfs.it) OpenBSD version to FreeBSD 4.8, but failed. Has any one tried this before? How much modification is needed? Any info is appreciated. Thanks, Yan

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build

...instead of yours. > > ... so I still don't get why you want to return a character string > instead of a value for the IQR; > and the mode of a sample defined as above is generally a bad estimator > of the mode of the distribution. To say more than that would take me > too far afield. Post on stats.stackexchange.com if you want to know > why (if it's even relevant). > > Cheers, > Bert > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." > -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed...

...gt; > ... so I still don't get why you want to return a character string > > instead of a value for the IQR; > > and the mode of a sample defined as above is generally a bad estimator > > of the mode of the distribution. To say more than that would take me > > too far afield. Post on stats.stackexchange.com if you want to know > > why (if it's even relevant). > > > > Cheers, > > Bert > > Bert Gunter > > > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > > and sticking things into it.&quo...

...I still don't get why you want to return a character string >> > instead of a value for the IQR; >> > and the mode of a sample defined as above is generally a bad estimator >> > of the mode of the distribution. To say more than that would take me >> > too far afield. Post on stats.stackexchange.com if you want to know >> > why (if it's even relevant). >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Bert >> > Bert Gunter >> > >> > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along >> >...

I have a client who wants a Meetme box with 12 FXO ports, to connect to Analogue lines coming from an Ericsson PBX. It looks like I could do this with four different hardware configurations: a) three TDM04B cards (based on TDM400P) b) one TDM04B and one TDM808B c) one TDM804B (or TDM854B?) and one TDP808B d) one TDM2403B (half filled TDM2400P) Apart from considerations of cost and PCI slot

From: Collins Richey > Sounds pretty religious-based to me. > IBM=bad > HP,Sun, RedHat, SCO=good. > OTOH, from some of your comments, Novell=better. Are you really that shallow? IBM is our partner, not our friend. Sun has its interests too, and has 5 different entities of focus, which vary. Red Hat is a tale of two companies, cut-throat business combined with GPL-analness (like

I have a problem that I think is probably fairly common but I haven''t seem to be able to come up with the magic combination of search terms to find a solution (or it really isn''t that common). Here''s the deal... Scenario: A system allows a user to enter in articles via a web-form. The system provides a preview function; not a live preview, but a preview on another

Hi, Here is what I am doing notGroupedAll <- ddply(data ,~groupColumn ,summarise ,col1_mean=mean(col1) ,col2_mode=Mode(col2) #Function I wrote for getting the mode shown below ,col3_Range=myIqr(col3) ) groupedAll <- ddply(data ,~groupColumn ,summarise

...m to play MPEG audio, and equally few people use xmms to play MPEG video, despite the fact that the underlying data format is fundamentally the same. And indeed, we see distinct mime types for audio/mpag and video/mpeg, and distinct file extensions. To draw another analogy that is somewhat further afield, XML is another data format that has many semantically different uses. For example, there is XHTML (a presentation-oriented web document markup language), SVG (a vector graphics format), DocBook/XML (a semantic markup language for documentation) and so on. While it might be logically correct to giv...

If you show us, not just tell us about, a self-contained example someone might show you a non-hacky way of getting the job done. (I don't see an argument to plyr::ddply called 'transform'.) Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Michael Artz <michaeleartz at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh thanks for that clarification Bert! Hope you enjoyed

Hi, because of the great editor "Writer" from Information Architects I've learned about Markdown and I love it. But it's very confusing, that there are so many standards with different features: classical Markdown, Markdown Extra, MultiMarkdown. I think for most users and the spreading of Markdown it would be nice, to have only one syntax. And this universal syntax should have

Hi Folks, I find myself trying to expand a 2-node high-availability cluster from to a 4-node cluster. I'm running Xen virtualization, and currently using DRBD to mirror data, and pacemaker to failover cleanly. The thing is, I'm trying to add 2 nodes to the cluster, and DRBD doesn't scale. Also, as a function of rackspace limits, and the hardware at hand, I can't separate