search for: affirmation

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1680 Summary: Match User/Group with no affirmative match does not work as expected Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want

DTrace folks, I''m pleased to introduce a potential new DTrace-sponsored project: the Erlang DTrace provider. To be good OpenSolaris citizens, we want to put the formation of this officially sponsored project to a vote -- as outlined in the OpenSolaris Constitution -- so here are the details for the new Project, as prepared by the Project Team: Name : Erlang DTrace Integration

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1680 Sven <sven at timegate.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugzilla.mindrot.or | |g/show_bug.cgi?id=2262 -- You are receiving

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1680 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1680 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1680 ED Fochler <mindrot at liquidbinary.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|5.3p1 |6.6p1 Hardware|Other |amd64 OS|All

Hello all, I have an app mounted under /test via lighttpd fastcgi as indicated on [1]. Here I use R(Foo, bar) in views to link to controller foo, this correctly creates a /test/foo/bar link. However, when I use R() in some controller, for example: headers[''Refresh''] = "60; url=#{R(Foo, bar)}" The generated link is /foo/bar, which obviously links to something

On 12 August 2017 at 15:10, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote: | As the Python posts poitns out, it is possible to use alternate malloc | implementations, either rebuilding R to use them or using LD_PRELOAD. | On Ubuntu for example, you can have R use jemalloc with | | sudo apt-get install libjemalloc1 | env LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjemalloc.so.1 R | | This does not seem to hold

...Mathias Dufresne (CN)* # Referral .... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ So "name" seems to be a duplication of "CN". It seems not possible to have different values for for these both attributes name and CN. Q1: Is that last affirmation true? Q2: Is there others attributes like those ones? Is there a list somewhere? Best regards, mathias

Hi Everyboy ! I read that LVM2 is not cluster aware (specially with OCFS2) from different post on internet forum... If it's true, could someone could confirm this information and point me where i can find this affirmation in documentation ? I do some test with OCFS2 on LVM2 and it's seems to run correctly , so i have some interrogation about this fact ! If it's true that LVM2 are not cluster aware, does anybody know how could i run ocfs on technology who are offer similair fonctionnality of LVM2? Thank...

...cle. VI. Clause 3 of the constitution of the United States states: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > I think the best way that I can currently contribute to the project is > through technical writing. So I see myself as doing a serious, long-term > project of extending the FAQ. So, I can affirm that I want to really start > working :) Awesome. I was myself thinking of a number of FAQs: >

...the following code: char a[20]; char s; char *p, *q; // p == &a[0]; q == &s; void test() { register char reg; s = 0; reg = p[0] + p[1]; s = q[0] + reg; return; } When I ask the question whether "&s" and "&q[0]" may potentially alias, I got negative affirmation. In the full test (not presented) they indeed may and do in fact alias, resulting in incorrect VLIW schedule. My question - is it a feature or a bug :) Here is somewhat more info: Before lowering begins: *** IR Dump After Remove sign extends *** define void @test() nounwind { entry: store i...

Hi, my bank requires a java certifiate that won't run under linux (I know that most of the java applets are platform independent, but this one is not). I've managed to get java running under Firefox with wine, but it turns out that their java won't run properly under Firefox neither. (This was affirmed by a windows user friend as well.) So my only remaining option is IE with wine.

...t command. > > I got a lage amount of users (and groups). > > The admin of the S3 server deleted (userdel) 75 users and these are > > still listed by pdbedit. How do I get rid os them?? > > > > I think you may be mistaken (or I did not fully understood your > > affirmation). These "no such user" users were deleted from Linux with > > "userdel -r" and are ghosts in Samba. > > I just tried to remove them (smbpasswd -x) them but got "Failed to > > delete entry for user XXXX" > > How do I get rid of these ghosts? &...

...t; > been "other_user" obtained from "wbinfo -u" > > this is probably because 'wbinfo -u' shows windows users and these may > not be Unix users, they may be members of the '*' domain. I think you may be mistaken (or I did not fully understood your affirmation). These "no such user" users were deleted from Linux with "userdel -r" and are ghosts in Samba. I just tried to remove them (smbpasswd -x) them but got "Failed to delete entry for user XXXX" How do I get rid of these ghosts? > > > > > This would not b...

Hi, I need to run a .reg file. In windows, I think I'd just double click on it. If I try to run it in wine, it says it's not a valid executable. How do I run it?

...&a[0]; q == &s; > > void test() > { >  register char reg; > >  s = 0; >  reg = p[0] + p[1]; >  s = q[0] + reg; > >  return; > } > > When I ask the question whether "&s" and "&q[0]" may potentially alias, I > got negative affirmation. > In the full test (not presented) they indeed may and do in fact alias, > resulting in incorrect VLIW schedule. > > My question - is it a feature or a bug :) > > Here is somewhat more info: > > Before lowering begins: > *** IR Dump After Remove sign extends *** > def...

On 19 Jan 2016, at 13:34, Nikolaos Milas <nmilas at noa.gr> wrote: > > On 15/1/2016 8:02 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > > Having received no reply, I tried using the above info by configuring: > > protocol imap { > imap_client_workarounds = "delay-newmail" > mail_plugins = quota imap_quota notify replication > mail_max_userip_connections