search for: affectted

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 18857 matches for "affectted".

Did you mean: affected
2008 Feb 04
2
make dataframe from table
Dear R-experts, I have got a dataframe: data ID disease V1 V2 1 p1 1 2 p1 3 3 p3 3 4 p3 5 5 p5 1 From which I extract a usefull table: affect affect 1 3 5 p1 1 1 0 p3 0 1 1 p5 1 0 0 I want to merge this with anotherdataframe: age p1 23 p2 24 p3 23 p4 11 p5 45 If have tried as.data.frame(affect) and other solutions to get the following comment going:
2002 Aug 28
0
FreeBSD Security Notice FreeBSD-SN-02:05
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SN-02:05 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issues in ports Announced: 2002-08-28 I. Introduction Several ports in the FreeBSD Ports
2003 Apr 08
3
SAMBA 2.07 Question
Hello, We are currently running SAMBA 2.07 on our AIX 4.3.3 UNIX systems. We just received the following: OpenPKG Security Advisory OpenPKG-SA-2003.028: samba - remote root exploit Does this affect SAMBA 2.07? This is all that I see affected: OpenPKG Security Advisory The OpenPKG Project http://www.openpkg.org/security.html http://www.openpkg.org
2016 Aug 12
2
Linux TCP flaw
On 12/08/16 17:56, Barry Brimer wrote: >> [root at vps ~]# uname -r >> 2.6.32-042stab108.7 > > Not needed. This affects 3.6+ kernels. You don't have one of those. It affects RHEL6 which runs 2.6.32, they backported the features that it affects. If the above openvz kernel was based on a RHEL6 kernel (and I'd guess it was) then it's affected. Peter
2020 Sep 19
3
zerologon affect standalone smb server or not
Hello ML, are there information about the CVE-2020-1472 , whether this bug also infects samba Server without DC configuration (standalone smb Server) ? I'll did not find any information in the short time and can not decide if this systems are affected. Can you please help me, to clear my clouded brain. best regards Michael
2010 Aug 04
3
one busy vm affects other vm
I am using Xen 3.1.0 in centos 5.4 I have one VM consuming 100% cpu  and all other VM (linux) become very slow (no ssh and vnc access). I could access host via ssh but not VM. host cpu is about 95% idle using dstat. Pls advise how to avoid this. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2002 May 13
0
FreeBSD Security Notice FreeBSD-SN-02:02
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SN-02:02 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issues in ports Announced: 2002-05-13 I. Introduction Several ports in the FreeBSD Ports
2004 Sep 02
2
Icecast 2 affected by cross-site scripting vulnerability in status-display?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, since Icecast <=1.3.12 has been affected by a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the status display (s. <http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Aug/1011046.html> and <http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-541>) it appears to be unclear so far if Icecast 2.x is vulnerable too. Can anyone of you maybe confirm it is affected/not
2007 Jun 22
0
How early sex affects teenagers ?
*How early sex affects teenagers ? Girls who have sex at an early age are at slightly greater risk than their peers for feeling <http://tomorrowsmedicinetoday.blogspot.com/2007/06/early-sex-affects-teenagers.html> * *depressed, a new study has found<http://tomorrowsmedicinetoday.blogspot.com/2007/06/early-sex-affects-teenagers.html> * *FOR MORE INFORMATION LOG
2012 Jun 08
2
Xen 4.0.x 3,000 second time skew problem
Hi, I have two installs of Xen 4.0.1 on Debian squeeze dom0s that occasionally skew the time by 3000 seconds. It is always 3000 seconds and it always affects all guests. Depending on the kernels in the guests they will say: tp0 kernel: [9339489.266542] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -2999660317697 ns) or perhaps the kernel doesn''t notice but ntpd does: ls0 ntpd[15009]:
2015 Oct 14
2
Remove trailing spaces
> Looking around, there appear to be a lot of small places needing some > whitespace cleanup/reconciliation. > Just to be clear, I am not criticizing, but actually asking... Are those white-space characters impacting the binaries being built? Would they affect common users? Are those characters affecting developers? For instance, do they affect some git command? Or, do they make
2016 Nov 01
3
CVE-2016-5195 DirtyCOW: Critical Linux Kernel Flaw
On Tue, November 1, 2016 6:25 pm, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <5818CD31.4050008 at moving-picture.com>, > James Pearson <james-p at moving-picture.com> wrote: >> Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote: >> > RedHat and Centos 4.x can be explored by this flaw? >> >> See: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-5195 > > In
2015 Jun 05
4
Regarding CVE-2015-1781 vulnerability in Glibc
Thanks for the reply. Where can we get the info regarding whether its fixed in CentOS 5 or not? I did rpm -q --changelog <glibc> | grep <CVE> but I dont find any info on this. This might means 3 things. 1. The version is not affected so no fix 2. The version is affected, still no fix 3. Fix applied, but not shown in o/p Thanks On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:06 PM, John Tall <mjtallx
2018 Sep 05
2
Domain vCPU threads affinity
Hello, According to the docs, vcpupin will use either cgroups or sched_setaffinity to pin vcpu threads to cpus. How is this decision made? I observe differences even on different hosts featuring the same version of libvirtd (1.3.1): on one host vcpupin affects cpuset.cpus (cgroup), and on the other it affects vcpu threads affinity (observed through taskset). Thanks, Nikos -------------- next
2016 Aug 12
1
Linux TCP flaw
On 08/11/2016 11:07 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Peter wrote: > >> On 12/08/16 17:56, Barry Brimer wrote: >>>> [root at vps ~]# uname -r >>>> 2.6.32-042stab108.7 >>> >>> Not needed. This affects 3.6+ kernels. You don't have one of those. >> >> It affects RHEL6 which runs 2.6.32, they backported the
2007 Aug 24
0
AST-2007-021: Crash from invalid/corrupted MIME bodies when using voicemail with IMAP storage
...--------| | Asterisk Appliance Developer | 0.x.x | Not Affected | | Kit | | | |--------------------------------+-------------+-------------------------| | s800i (Asterisk Appliance) | 1.0.x | Not Affectted | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Corrected In | |-----------------------------------...
2007 Aug 24
0
AST-2007-021: Crash from invalid/corrupted MIME bodies when using voicemail with IMAP storage
...--------| | Asterisk Appliance Developer | 0.x.x | Not Affected | | Kit | | | |--------------------------------+-------------+-------------------------| | s800i (Asterisk Appliance) | 1.0.x | Not Affectted | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Corrected In | |-----------------------------------...
2010 Mar 08
3
Security problem with Samba on Linux - affects 3.5.0, 3.4.6 and 3.3.11
Security problem with Samba on Linux ------------------------------------ In Samba releases 3.5.0, 3.4.6 and 3.3.11 new code was added to fix a problem with Linux asynchronous IO handling. This code introduced a severe security flaw which was undetected until now. We are releasing new binaries and fixed source code as release numbers: 3.5.1, 3.4.7 and 3.3.12 with this fix included. This will be
2010 Mar 08
3
Security problem with Samba on Linux - affects 3.5.0, 3.4.6 and 3.3.11
Security problem with Samba on Linux ------------------------------------ In Samba releases 3.5.0, 3.4.6 and 3.3.11 new code was added to fix a problem with Linux asynchronous IO handling. This code introduced a severe security flaw which was undetected until now. We are releasing new binaries and fixed source code as release numbers: 3.5.1, 3.4.7 and 3.3.12 with this fix included. This will be
2009 Nov 27
1
Possibility so that --max-size AFFECTS --delete ?
Hello rsyncers! PRACTICAL CIRCUMSTANCES: Backup1 shall be identical to Original. My traditional custom. NO HELP NEEDED for this. Backup2 shall only be a subset of the original, only files with a certain maximum size and filename/suffix pattern get included. For this I use rsync's filename filters and size limitations! HELP NEEDED here! Thanks! QUESTION: Is there a possibility, so