search for: affected

Dear R-experts, I have got a dataframe: data ID disease V1 V2 1 p1 1 2 p1 3 3 p3 3 4 p3 5 5 p5 1 From which I extract a usefull table: affect affect 1 3 5 p1 1 1 0 p3 0 1 1 p5 1 0 0 I want to merge this with anotherdataframe: age p1 23 p2 24 p3 23 p4 11 p5 45 If have tried as.data.frame(affect) and other solutions to get the following comment going:

...==== FreeBSD-SN-02:05 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issues in ports Announced: 2002-08-28 I. Introduction Several ports in the FreeBSD Ports Collection are affected by security issues. These are listed below with references and affected versions. All versions given refer to the FreeBSD port/package version numbers. The listed vulnerabilities are not specific to FreeBSD unless otherwise noted. These ports are not installed by default, nor are they ``part of F...

Hello, We are currently running SAMBA 2.07 on our AIX 4.3.3 UNIX systems. We just received the following: OpenPKG Security Advisory OpenPKG-SA-2003.028: samba - remote root exploit Does this affect SAMBA 2.07? This is all that I see affected: OpenPKG Security Advisory The OpenPKG Project http://www.openpkg.org/security.html http://www.openpkg.org openpkg-security@openpkg.org openpkg@openpkg.org OpenPKG-SA-2003.028 07-Apr-2003 _____...

...name -r >> 2.6.32-042stab108.7 > > Not needed. This affects 3.6+ kernels. You don't have one of those. It affects RHEL6 which runs 2.6.32, they backported the features that it affects. If the above openvz kernel was based on a RHEL6 kernel (and I'd guess it was) then it's affected. Peter

Hello ML, are there information about the CVE-2020-1472 , whether this bug also infects samba Server without DC configuration (standalone smb Server) ? I'll did not find any information in the short time and can not decide if this systems are affected. Can you please help me, to clear my clouded brain. best regards Michael

I am using Xen 3.1.0 in centos 5.4 I have one VM consuming 100% cpu  and all other VM (linux) become very slow (no ssh and vnc access). I could access host via ssh but not VM. host cpu is about 95% idle using dstat. Pls advise how to avoid this. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...==== FreeBSD-SN-02:02 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issues in ports Announced: 2002-05-13 I. Introduction Several ports in the FreeBSD Ports Collection are affected by security issues. These are listed below with references and affected versions. All versions given refer to the FreeBSD port/package version numbers. The listed vulnerabilities are not specific to FreeBSD unless otherwise noted. These ports are not installed by default, nor are they ``part of F...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, since Icecast <=1.3.12 has been affected by a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the status display (s. <http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Aug/1011046.html> and <http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-541>) it appears to be unclear so far if Icecast 2.x is vulnerable too. Can anyone of you maybe confirm it is affected...

*How early sex affects teenagers ? Girls who have sex at an early age are at slightly greater risk than their peers for feeling <http://tomorrowsmedicinetoday.blogspot.com/2007/06/early-sex-affects-teenagers.html> * *depressed, a new study has found<http://tomorrowsmedicinetoday.blogspot.com/2007/06/early-sex-affects-teenagers.html> * *FOR MORE INFORMATION LOG

...Olivier, did it fix things for you? These are Debian squeeze installs so using packaged versions of xen and kernel: ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-45 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support ii xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 The Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 One of the hosts affected is: CPU: Xeon 5410 Motherboard: Supermicro X7DCL-i The other is: CPU: Xeon E5606 Motherboard: SUpermicro X8DTN+ but I do have other servers with same hardware as both of these that aren''t affected. Cheers, Andy

> Looking around, there appear to be a lot of small places needing some > whitespace cleanup/reconciliation. > Just to be clear, I am not criticizing, but actually asking... Are those white-space characters impacting the binaries being built? Would they affect common users? Are those characters affecting developers? For instance, do they affect some git command? Or, do they make

...james-p at moving-picture.com> wrote: >> Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote: >> > RedHat and Centos 4.x can be explored by this flaw? >> >> See: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-5195 > > In other words, no: RHEL 4 and CentOS4 are not affected by this flaw. My understanding is: RHEL is obsolete, hence it will not even be mentioned on that page, whether it is known to be affected or not. Valeri > > Tony > -- > Tony Mountifield > Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk > Play: tony at mountifield.org - h...

Thanks for the reply. Where can we get the info regarding whether its fixed in CentOS 5 or not? I did rpm -q --changelog <glibc> | grep <CVE> but I dont find any info on this. This might means 3 things. 1. The version is not affected so no fix 2. The version is affected, still no fix 3. Fix applied, but not shown in o/p Thanks On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:06 PM, John Tall <mjtallx at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku > <dvrao.584 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, &...

Hello, According to the docs, vcpupin will use either cgroups or sched_setaffinity to pin vcpu threads to cpus. How is this decision made? I observe differences even on different hosts featuring the same version of libvirtd (1.3.1): on one host vcpupin affects cpuset.cpus (cgroup), and on the other it affects vcpu threads affinity (observed through taskset). Thanks, Nikos -------------- next

...>>> Not needed. This affects 3.6+ kernels. You don't have one of those. >> >> It affects RHEL6 which runs 2.6.32, they backported the features that it >> affects. If the above openvz kernel was based on a RHEL6 kernel (and >> I'd guess it was) then it's affected. > > If this feature was backported, then it surely may be the case although > I've not seen any reference indicating that. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-5696 says CentOS 6 is affected.

...er, the issue will be fixed in | | | Asterisk Open Source version 1.4.12 when it is released. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Affected Versions | |------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Product | Release | | | | Series | | |-----------------------...

...er, the issue will be fixed in | | | Asterisk Open Source version 1.4.12 when it is released. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Affected Versions | |------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Product | Release | | | | Series | | |-----------------------...

...n when permissions should have denied access. Please note this security problem does not affect any platform that does not support capabilities and platforms where binaries were built without libcap support. Also note that 3.4.5 and prior 3.4.x versions and 3.3.10 and prior 3.3.x versions are NOT affected. How did this happen ? --------------------- Our testing procedures failed. Errors in code always happen, and we guard against them by writing tests which we run against the code continuously. As Samba runs as a root process, many of our test environments run under a build farm "shim"...

...n when permissions should have denied access. Please note this security problem does not affect any platform that does not support capabilities and platforms where binaries were built without libcap support. Also note that 3.4.5 and prior 3.4.x versions and 3.3.10 and prior 3.3.x versions are NOT affected. How did this happen ? --------------------- Our testing procedures failed. Errors in code always happen, and we guard against them by writing tests which we run against the code continuously. As Samba runs as a root process, many of our test environments run under a build farm "shim"...

...ude, so it doesn't affect the data that goes into the file-lists, and thus it doesn't affect deletions. It just limits the files that the receiver requests to be transferred. [...] The content of this newsgroup post, makes me think, that in earlier versions --max-size may have once AFFECTED --delete: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.rsync.general/12024 Regards, Stefan Nowak === MY PARTIAL BACKUP SCRIPT === rsync \ --protect-args \ \ --recursive \ --one-file-system \ --links \ --hard-links \ --times \ --crtimes \ --perms \ --owner \ --group \ --acls \ --devices \ --specials...