search for: advfs

...ays DFS is a later version of something called AFS, from Carnegie Mellon University. This is confusing for a couple reasons. 1) It hasn't been called OSF/1 for quite some time. 2) I don't think Digital UNIX (now Compaq Tru64 UNIX) has a DFS (or AFS) file system. It has a file system called AdvFS, but I don't know if that is what the samba documentation is referring to.... which leads to my question? Does anyone know whether I need to use the --with-dfs option? (and under what circumstances?) Any other useful advice? Thanks, John

...t; data (rather than you having to put some filesystems on SSD and some on hard drive). Now, if btrfs ever gets all the kinks worked out (and has a stable "fsck" for the corner cases), it integrates volume management into the filesystem, which makes some of the management easier. I used AdvFS on DEC/Compaq/HP Tru64 Unix, which had some of that, and it made some of this easier/faster/smoother. Btrfs may eventually obsolete a lot of uses of LVM, but that's down the road. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

I run Samba 2.2.2 on any of there vendors/osversions/filesystems: o Solaris 8 / ufs o Tru64 Unix V5.0A / advfs o RedHat 7.1 / Kernel 2.4.2 / ext2fs all these are capable of handling large files (files with a 64-bit-offset larger than 4GB). At configure time, samba selects the proper compile flags (-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE, -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64) for use with large files. The problem: When I back up a Win200...

...has occurred". It deletes the file OK, but when I write to the Samba server it creates the file with 0 bytes size. An "ls -l" from the OS confirms this size. When doing a directory listing on this server it is slow and tells me that I have 0 bytes free on the disk. We are using Advfs to create the filesystem on both Alpha's and the filesystem sizes range anywhere from ~260 MB (root) to ~80 GB (database). These errors occur no matter where my directory that is mapped to the samba share is located. What really bugs me is that the two servers are nearly identical. The differ...

SEND: Teoman TURHAN Hi teams. I installed samba 2.0.9 on Alpha server TRU64 unix 4.0F. But I cannot configure --with-dfs because this Tru64 unix was installing chosed filesystem type UFS filesystem. but I used ./configure command and make and make install. I installed ADVFS file system 2 days ago samba 2.2.2 on TRU64 unix. but I don't live a problem. all services were running. UFS BUG #smbclient -U% -L localhost add ip (slip configuration browseable) add ip (ethernet configuration browsable) session request to LOCALHOST failed (code 0) read_socket_with_timeout:...

...has occurred". It deletes the file OK, but when I write to the Samba server it creates the file with 0 bytes size. An "ls -l" from the OS confirms this size. When doing a directory listing on this server it is slow and tells me that I have 0 bytes free on the disk. We are using Advfs to create the filesystem on both Alpha's and the filesystem sizes range anywhere from ~260 MB (root) to ~80 GB (database). These errors occur no matter where my directory that is mapped to the samba share is located. What really bugs me is that the two servers are nearly identical. The differ...

Hi all, I am running a samba server (2.0.3) in a small eth-based home network. There is only one win client (NT workstation, Sp4). The samba box ist set up with wins support enabled and the NT box? wins server entry points to samba server. Everything works fine: no error messages neither server nor client. The server shows up immediately in the NT?s network neigborhood. Browsing is fast. !!But

On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm > sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the > hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of > LVM. What am I missing? Well, there's best and worst case scenarios. Best case for file-backed VMs is

Not sure if it''s been posted yet, my email is currently down... http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/10/suns_zfs_is_clo.html Interesting piece. This is the second post from Yager that shows solaris in a pretty good light. I particularly like his closing comment: "If you haven''t checked out ZFS yet, do, because it will eventually become ubiquitously implemented