search for: adventer

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:07 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > > We should certainly document what I have summaries here properly at a > > central palce! > > Please review the three edits I've submitted to the wiki: > https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Special:Contributions/Fghaas >

Dear List, the advent of multicore machines in the consumer segment makes me wonder whether it would, at least in principle, be possible to divide a computational task into more slave R processes running on the different cores of the same processor, more or less in the way package SNOW would do on a cluster. I am thinking of simple 'embarassingly parallel' problems, just like inverting

Hi- Because a majority of my customers are in Europe, I've gotten quite used to working with ISDN (PRI) and BRI on a regular basis. Recently one of my customers asked me if I could terminate a few lines locally here in the USA (California), so I called up SBC to enquire as to how much it would cost to install a BRI here. Although the rates were reasonable (except the installation), I got

Hi everyone, I've been installing software on my Mac using Wine for quite some time Mac OS X 10.6.8 2GB RAM ATI X1600 128 MB Not the best specs but you'd be surprised at what will run on such an old rig. My main inquiry for this post is concerning the Stalker series and the patch that fixed the mouse issues present in Clear Sky and Call of Pripyat pre 1.4 stable. Since around the 1.3.24

On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 28.05.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >> >> >> >> On 05/28/2017 04:24 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> In article <792718e8-f403-1dea-367d-977b157af82c at htt-consult.com>, >>> Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >>>> On 05/26/2017

> Am 29.05.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: > > > > On 05/29/2017 06:46 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 29.05.2017 um 05:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >>>> On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote:

> Am 29.05.2017 um 05:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: > > > > On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote: >>>> Am 28.05.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 05/28/2017 04:24 AM, Tony

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:07 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: >> > We should certainly document what I have summaries here properly at a >> > central palce! >> >> Please review the three

Hi All! Is it possible to populate a form (or certain elements) with the shipped AJAX library? When using link_to_remote it seems that only innerHTML of a DOM element can be updated, but I would like to set the value of a text field (or perhaps multiple). Greetings, Wouter -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I'd note that the mkisofs man page listed about a dozen different formats used in various contexts to store Mac resource forks and finder metadata in various contexts. I'd imagine the advent of MacOSX (with UFS support) has narrowed the field of what options are common somewhat, but it's an area where a lot of ad-hoc solutions made it out to the real world. On the other hand, the

Yes, lots of packages do use C/Fortran code ... it would be great if there were more packages that are "pure R" especially since the advent of S4 classes and namespaces. Is it worth suggesting that we create a designation "pure R" for packages that have no external source code and encourage more of these? Indeed, now the number of packages is so big could they be classified to

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 12:02:25PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote: [...] > > I've made some minor edits to clarify a bunch of bits, and a link to the > > Kernel doc about Intel nVMX. (Hope that looks fine.) > > I'm sure they it does, but just so you know I currently don't see any

Hi, As the "new Sieve implementation" is using a "gratefully stolen copy of deliver.c from dovecot" (i.e. a dirty code in mail-raw.c), would it be possible for the Sieve piece 1 - to be using files from dovecot directly rather than copying&changing it (which is very bad for maintenance) 2 - to be incorporated in the hg/mercurial tree of dovecot ? Thanks a lot

On 8/11/2017 1:29 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 11.08.2017 11:36, Michael Felt wrote: > >> This is what Ralph means when he says "have been running a CA for >> 15+ years" - not that he is (though he could!) sell certificates >> commercially - rather, he is using an initial certificate to sign >> later certificates with. > Actually, I do sell certificates

Still in the process of migrating from an old CentOS5 server to a brand new CentOS7. After finally getting Virtualbox-5.0 installed and a new Wondoze10 Pro installed it became time to shift the data from the old server to the new. The old server is headless and I installed the old WindozeXP into the Virtualbox4.x via the command line. To do some of the admin I needed to attach to the windoze

I think it would be nice to be able to rate limit an action, too.. suppose I have an action named Accept_good_source : ACCEPT - - tcp - 1024:65535 ACCEPT - - udp - 1024:65535 and that i want to use it in an action called AllowCVS, i can''t limit the cvs usage, but only the general use of Accept_good_source... same goes for userset... as each rule will give one iptables command, I

I just created something very similar for one of my own projects. I have a disk image that you can "dd" onto a hard drive or USB drive and a bash script demonstrating how it was done here: https://www.syslinux.org/archives/2019-July/026476.html You don't actually need the patch for the dual BIOS/UEFI support. The patch in the above link is just to enable the reading of config

I have looked at let's encrypt. Key issue for me is having to add a lot python stuff that would otherwise not be on any server. Again, All CA's like "Let's Encrypt" - and others that are accepted by the "majors", e.g., Windows, Mozilla make it much easier for the "random" user to use anything you protect with SSL (better TLS) without them having to

The biggest problem with Vorbis comments are too loose specifications and too little standardisation. Another problem is attribution of involved parties. Currently only the ARTIST field name is supported in software. More standardised field names need to be worked out for organisations and persons involved in the production of the recording. See:

Hi, Hope you can help. Grateful for your time. I was in touch recently requesting the drop opportunity below be shared with your distribution list (it was originally declined as hadn't provided sufficient context about LLVM. I provided the edited version, below, on 27th of January). Please can you confirm, has this been sent out to your distribution list? We have not had much response, so